TomasHertlsRooster
Don’t say eye test when you mean points
Byron has three more years at $3.4M.
Mete has one year at $735K.
I wonder, packaged together, do these two have positive value?
Byron has three more years at $3.4M.
Mete has one year at $735K.
I wonder, packaged together, do these two have positive value?
Not even close IMO...
I doubt that at this point Killorn has positive value and he is >>>>> Byron IMO...
Mete does not really move the needle for anyone I would assume either...
Killorn also makes 1.05 million more and has a 16 teams no trade list.
Byron has three more years at $3.4M.
Mete has one year at $735K.
I wonder, packaged together, do these two have positive value?
The number of teams that need to shed cap keeps rising, while the number of teams that can accept it keeps dropping.
Mete is signed for peanuts so I doubt he would be moved, plus he can play both the right and left side.
Byron and Kulak would be the likely guys to be traded.
Armia + Mete for what? They both clearly have positive value.Lol.... Mete + Byron + what of value to take these 2 off the Habs hands?
I’d take Armia back to WPG, but not with these 2 attached.
Armia + Mete might work
I think we will see a ton of buyouts the moment the second window opens..
Really almost not other way out for a few teams...
Why would they need to move Mete, literally can't make less for a bottom pairing D with some upside.
Only explanation is Byron probably has negative value.
Lol I bet it would Dream onLol.... Mete + Byron + what of value to take these 2 off the Habs hands?
I’d take Armia back to WPG, but not with these 2 attached.
Armia + Mete might work
Byron to Ottawa maybe?
He's from Ottawa and has a salary of 2.8M this season while his cap hit is 3.4M.
So Byron and Mete for 2 AHLer (for contract purposes)