Empoleon8771
Registered User
What exactly are we meant to paying for a depth forward on pace for 11 goals and 34 points?
More than a decent prospect and a waive wire throw-in guy.
What exactly are we meant to paying for a depth forward on pace for 11 goals and 34 points?
Why? Does Roy fetch a 1st if he was traded for a pick straight up?More than a decent prospect and a waive wire throw-in guy.
What exactly are we meant to paying for a depth forward on pace for 11 goals and 34 points?
More than a decent prospect and a waive wire throw-in guy.
Raks has term, jake didn't. Raks should get more.Bunting was a cap dump in that deal. He was having a bad year for the Canes and had 2 years left of term. He wasnt a positive asset but a cap balance piece
Rakell wont get back Guentzel level package because at his best hes worst 10-15% than normal Guentzel.
They arent comparable players.