Claimed off Waivers: [VGK] Golden Knights claim F Cole Schwindt off waivers from the Flames

Figgy44

A toast of purple gato for the memories
Dec 15, 2014
13,947
9,280
VGK needs centre depth that badly?

I hope Schwindt does well. Not sure why he couldn't figure it out with us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morrison

Bond

Registered User
May 10, 2012
4,408
3,337
VGK needs centre depth that badly?

I hope Schwindt does well. Not sure why he couldn't figure it out with us.
If the Flames were good then I bet they would have kept Schwindt as a low cost 4th line center. They don't really need one right now though and Schwindt will be passed over multiple times by the time they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Figgy44

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
36,968
59,502
Weegartown
I mean he's nothing special but that's a hit to an already shitty natural center depth chart. Big, moves well, good shot when he can get it off, solid both positionally and defensively. Isn't physical or aggressive enough. Really only has bottom 6 upside and more 4th line than 3rd but you could do worse for a prospective 4C.

Could see the Flames claiming him back if he is waived again this season. He was a fairly important player for the Wranglers.
 

DJJones

Registered User
Nov 18, 2014
10,787
4,120
Calgary
If the Flames were good then I bet they would have kept Schwindt as a low cost 4th line center. They don't really need one right now though and Schwindt will be passed over multiple times by the time they do.

Seems like even Morton was ahead of schwindt on most peoples rankings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nanuuk

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,541
20,618
Team without prospect claiming a couple of sorta prospects. We'll see if they can survive 30 days now.
 

Figgy44

A toast of purple gato for the memories
Dec 15, 2014
13,947
9,280
If the Flames were good then I bet they would have kept Schwindt as a low cost 4th line center. They don't really need one right now though and Schwindt will be passed over multiple times by the time they do.

I think Rooney upping his game and extending is why Schwindt is in this scenario. Rooney is doing what we were hoping Schwindt would be doing for us now. Flames also have a few guys who will share bottom 6 C responsibilities.

I think the Oilers are more upset about the VGK claims than us. I think they needed a bonafide 4C more than we did, especially after the McLeod trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ace Rimmer

Bond

Registered User
May 10, 2012
4,408
3,337
I think Rooney upping his game and extending is why Schwindt is in this scenario. Rooney is doing what we were hoping Schwindt would be doing for us now. Flames also have a few guys who will share bottom 6 C responsibilities.

I think the Oilers are more upset about the VGK claims than us. I think they needed a bonafide 4C more than we did, especially after the McLeod trade.
Yeah, the Flames don't need to worry about plugging the 4th line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Figgy44

Zirakzigil

Global Moderator
Jul 5, 2010
30,645
26,630
Canada
The question is would the Flames take him back
Yes, they would put him in the AHL if/when Vegas waives him.

Has had a lot of oppertunity to take the the 4th line center spot on the Flames. Never seemed to be able to put it together for more than a handful of games though.
 

Figgy44

A toast of purple gato for the memories
Dec 15, 2014
13,947
9,280
I think this was a tit for tat move by Vegas. They're still pissed at losing Pachal last season.

Doubt it. Unless Oilers claimed someone from them too.

Vegas needs/wants an inexpensive bottom 6 C (perhaps RHS is an attribute they want too). That's why Lavoie was also claimed, then put back on waivers. They were covering their bases, got both, kept Schwindt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RogerRogerr

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,734
7,538
Does anybody actually care that he's gone? I think most saw his ceiling as being a 4th line plug. Probably the easiest decision Conroy had when deciding who to waive.
That describes half the team in Calgary this season. How did they decide who to cut?
 

Rubi

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 9, 2009
16,422
10,891
Overlooking the Sheep River
That describes half the team in Calgary this season. How did they decide who to cut?
I onow you're trolling in fun but honestly our fwd group, for the most part, is fairly respectable. No superstars or even stars but but most of them would be desirable acquisitions by other teams.. forgetting about contract length or size for some.
Ou r big problem this year is our defence. Outside of Weagar and Andersson it sucks donkey balls. Also our goaltending could be a problem. Vladar is meh and definitely not a #1 and Wolf is a rookie being thrown to the wolves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nanuuk

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,734
7,538
I onow you're trolling in fun but honestly our fwd group, for the most part, is fairly respectable. No superstars or even stars but but most of them would be desirable acquisitions by other teams.. forgetting about contract length or size for some.
Ou r big problem this year is our defence. Outside of Weagar and Andersson it sucks donkey balls. Also our goaltending could be a problem. Vladar is meh and definitely not a #1 and Wolf is a rookie being thrown to the wolves.
The issue with Calgary forwards is with the exception of Coleman and Backlund all the other older top nine players, are one way guys that don't bring enough offence to justify the one way play.

You've got some bottom line guys that are offensive black holes and not really defensive stalwarts either. Then you've got another 5 or so guys that don't even have a full NHL season.

I don't see that as a top half of the league forward core, and the issue is that the forward core is the team's strength.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad