Seravalli: Vegas shopping Dadonov to other teams
- Thread starter MMC
- Start date
Turin
Erik Karlsson is good
- Feb 27, 2018
- 24,026
- 28,456
I feel bad that Dadanov is just being sent out to Azazel to atone for Vegas’ financial sins. Always liked the player.
does it have to be dadonov ?
maybe its easier to move Smith who's on an expiring contract
I'm not fully aware of how desperate the situation is though .
maybe its easier to move Smith who's on an expiring contract
I'm not fully aware of how desperate the situation is though .
Cootsfanclub
For Oskar!
- Mar 29, 2013
- 7,801
- 4,478
Are teams no longer able to make post deadline trades? They used to be able to with the caveat that dealt players would not be eligible for the playoffs.
ElPrimeTime
Registered User
They still can. A team like Chicago makes sense with Vegas getting Johnson and Shaw.
The Mighty Duck Man
R-E-L-A-X
If Dadonov is traded he can't play at all. Which makes this extra shitty for him but it is what it is.
Pavelski2112
Bold as Boognish
Traded players can't play for the rest of the regular season either. UFAs signed post-deadline are allowed to play the rest of the regular season but not the playoffs.
Empoleon8771
Registered User
I actually think allowing Vegas to trade Dadonov and allowing him to play for the rest of the year is a completely reasonable call by the NHL.
I think the NHL scolding Ottawa for causing the confusion at the beginning and telling Vegas "your trade is voided, make another one now or you're out of luck" is a pretty reasonable outcome here.
I think the NHL scolding Ottawa for causing the confusion at the beginning and telling Vegas "your trade is voided, make another one now or you're out of luck" is a pretty reasonable outcome here.
joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 54,039
- 17,171
I agree that Dadonov shouldn't be punished, but they need to figure out for sure what happened in the Ottawa trade.
If there is evidence of a NTC then I don't think Dadonov should get special treatment and Vegas should be punished.
However, if they really didn't have it at the time of the trade than I can see an exception done so that Dadonov can play elsewhere.
If there is evidence of a NTC then I don't think Dadonov should get special treatment and Vegas should be punished.
However, if they really didn't have it at the time of the trade than I can see an exception done so that Dadonov can play elsewhere.
MMC
Global Moderator
Lmao, if Vegas and Dadonov are getting these perks then Anaheim better damn well be getting something
Empoleon8771
Registered User
Fine Ottawa a 3rd round pick and send it to Anaheim then.
joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 54,039
- 17,171
Vegas isn't getting any perk. They are free to trade him at any given time. Dadonov would be the only guy getting a perk.
KrisLetAngry
MrJukeBoy
Bingo.
Vegas can trade him regardless to any of 10 teams.
Him being able to play would be a benefit to him.
Vegas doesn't care if he plays.
MMC
Global Moderator
If they're allowed to move them to another team that he can play for the rest of the year, they're giving them an extended market to make a move that legally they aren't support to be able to make now
Kevin Musto
Hard for Bedard
- Feb 16, 2018
- 22,519
- 29,216
BB88
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2015
- 41,466
- 21,852
Why would any team want to help Vegas out of their cap hell by acquiring a player that can't even play for the rest of the year ? Vegas would need to give up significant assets
Why not just do the rest of the trade (2nd round pick for Kesler+Moore) and waive Dad? If someone before the Ducks takes him, oh well, if he falls to the Ducks, then Vegas is guaranteed that someone will take him. It would be a scummy move by Vegas, but not like that would stop them. Even if he can't play for Anaheim this season, Ducks can eat half his salary next year and move him out in the summer.
joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 54,039
- 17,171
Personally I think if they did get him they'd be better off holding onto him. See if he can build his stock back up and move him at next year's deadline.
joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 54,039
- 17,171
Honestly what playoff team would want him with an extra year? It's probably going to be a non-playoff team. So why not take at the very least a free 2nd rounder?
rt
Clean Hits on Substack
Dadonov and a 2nd to AZ.
Then AZ retains 50% and trades him to a playoff team at the draft for another 2nd.
Two free 2nds for AZ.
Then AZ retains 50% and trades him to a playoff team at the draft for another 2nd.
Two free 2nds for AZ.
The NHL and the NHLPA has to go back and collective bargain that rule change to where players can play regular season but not playoffs in a post deadline trade.
This was under the assumption he wouldn't report to Anaheim or be sulking the whole time, sorry forgot to mention that. If he wants to play and is told he'll be moved by the deadline, that's great. But having a bad attitude in a young locker room would be less than ideal. It seems like he's more interested in money, so I doubt he'd sit out. The bad attitude thing is probably more likely.
Arthuros
Registered Snoozer
I'm sure AZ would charge more than a 2nd for the privilege.
Ad
Latest posts
-
TV: Favorite Simpsons Moments - Part XI | Isolated and Weird Wasps- Latest: Fixed to Ruin
