Proposal: Vegas and Minnesota

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
40,563
18,902
Exactly, we gave a 1st for Hanzal to be a 3rd line center as a rental. What a waste.

So your point is that we should make other awful deals like this one to...make up for it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikeyp24

elnewby

Registered User
Feb 21, 2012
2,054
43
MT
The two things that Minnesota definitely doesn’t need are:

Left handed defenseman
Slow, bottom 6 wingers on the wrong side of 30

/thread
 

nt3005

Registered User
Jan 12, 2015
707
160
Dakota Territory
Not a chance in hell Vegas gives up their #1D for that package, not to mention giving Reaves as a throw in.

Thats good that Vegas wouldn't do it, because this is atrocious for MN.

Schmidt is not a #1D on the Wild, and Reaves also brings minimal value. A team that has one of the highest scoring Defenses doesn't need to add another Scoring D Man. Also we struggle to score goals, how would Reaves help this team?
 

CupInSIX

My cap runneth over
Jul 1, 2012
26,314
18,268
Alphaville
Thats good that Vegas wouldn't do it, because this is atrocious for MN.

Schmidt is not a #1D on the Wild, and Reaves also brings minimal value. A team that has one of the highest scoring Defenses doesn't need to add another Scoring D Man. Also we struggle to score goals, how would Reaves help this team?
that-is-why-you-fail.jpg


Imagine thinking a package of your #4 and a glorified 3rd liner would be enough to get a legit #1...
 

Bazeek

Registered Lurker
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2011
17,928
11,285
Exiled in Madison
If Schmidt's Vegas' best defender it doesn't make sense to trade him for Brodin and Coyle.

Likewise, it doesn't make sense for Minnesota to give up Brodin and Coyle when they've got 3 defensemen better than Schmidt.

Not sure why this needed to get bumped.
 

CupInSIX

My cap runneth over
Jul 1, 2012
26,314
18,268
Alphaville
I can't tell if your actually being serious or not. But your talking about the 27 year old, left shot D, with a career high of 5 Goals and 36 pts?

Let me guess you wouldn't move Brodin for Ellis either :laugh:.

Ellis never broke 40 points he must not be very good.
 

gwh

Registered User
Mar 4, 2013
3,688
622
Let me guess you wouldn't move Brodin for Ellis either :laugh:.

Ellis never broke 40 points he must not be very good.

5/5 for internet discussion ability.

I think nobody would trade Ellis to get Schmidt, if that was the question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikeyp24

llp

Registered User
Jun 2, 2008
273
47
And Brodin being our "number four" defenceman because he plays behind Suter means that he isn't very good either?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timj5304

nt3005

Registered User
Jan 12, 2015
707
160
Dakota Territory
Let me guess you wouldn't move Brodin for Ellis either :laugh:.

Ellis never broke 40 points he must not be very good.

I'm guessing our GM might make the trade of Brodin for Ellis because he loves his Nashville boys. But if we did make that trade it would be a setup for a trade of Dumba or Spurgeon because Ellis Would be to expensive with his new contract.

Schmidt also doesn't get you Ellis.
 

mikeyp24

Registered User
Jun 28, 2014
5,959
1,231
Reading through this thread only to realize on page 2 it was a necro made my day. Hilariously bad to start but to retread was even better. As the neutral fan in this situation and if I had to pick 1 or the other team I like more I 100% choose vegas but man this is bad for MIN.


I also love the idea that people think Reeves is worth stuff these days. Curse you Pens for that whole 1st rounder garbage you created.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad