You can thank Tocchet for that. Samemas for Kuzy. Tocchet completely laid an egg this year then he quit and left once he talked to Hughes about his departure.A very dumb trade by the Canucks, from the moment it was made.
Not only did we trade away a potential top 6 utility player, signed for two years at 1mil, for a lowly 4th. We also traded him to what was at the time, barring this disaster of a season, our biggest competition within the division.
There was no reason to move on this trade as quickly as we did. I figured it would sting us at some point, I just hope it won't be that badly. If he ends up a 20g-20a line driver, that will be painful.
You can thank Tocchet for that. Samemas for Kuzy. Tocchet completely laid an egg this year then he quit and left once he talked to Hughes about his departure.
Yep, he’s not an NHLer but the Nucks can keep him cheap if a warm body is needed.He is worth more for Canucks than other teams in the league imo, don’t see Canucks getting anything worth moving him for.
Yeah , Toch is the issue about Quinn being lazy… go figure….You can thank Tocchet for that. Samemas for Kuzy. Tocchet completely laid an egg this year then he quit and left once he talked to Hughes about his departure.
Quinn Hughes playing 40 minutes per game and playing with injury, putting his team on his back is called being lazy....what a logicYeah , Toch is the issue about Quinn being lazy… go figure….
We lost Kuzmenko, Podkolzin and many more because of Toch. Then Tocchet packs up and leavesI agree. We shaped a team around a coach who didn’t want to be here. I think Kuz could have been successful too, we just didn’t coach him right. THAT isn’t a slight on Toc, he’s allowed to have his own preferences. It just annoying that he projects them then quits when the team is shaped how he wants.
This makes no sense. Podkolzin has fit in very nicely for the oilers as a role player. Can’t say the same for puljujarviHe's the NHL version of Puljujarvi. Almost never hurts to have him on the ice. Probably won't score but he'll make things hard for the other team.
I think he’s developing really nicely. Probably not what you hoped at 10OA, but man is he going to be a big part of the oilers for a while
This makes no sense. Podkolzin has fit in very nicely for the oilers as a role player. Can’t say the same for puljujarvi
He played 82 games, most of them with Draisaitl, and still only managed 8 goals. I like who he is now and I hope for a little more, but I don't expect much more.
It was easy to miss because it was sandwiched in between hip-injury ruined seasons, but Puljujarvi was at one point a terrific role player for the Oilers. He got ridiculous on ice results. If Podkolzin can do that, and more consistently this time, the Oilers would be thrilled.
He played 82 games, most of them with Draisaitl, and still only managed 8 goals. I like who he is now and I hope for a little more, but I don't expect much more.
It was easy to miss because it was sandwiched in between hip-injury ruined seasons, but Puljujarvi was at one point a terrific role player for the Oilers. He got ridiculous on ice results. If Podkolzin can do that, and more consistently this time, the Oilers would be thrilled.
Don't think this is true. Tocchet was asked about him and he said that by the time he got to coach him he was too deep in the dog house and needed a fresh start elsewhere.Rick Tocchet
A very dumb trade by the Canucks, from the moment it was made.
Not only did we trade away a potential top 6 utility player, signed for two years at 1mil, for a lowly 4th. We also traded him to what was at the time, barring this disaster of a season, our biggest competition within the division.
There was no reason to move on this trade as quickly as we did. I figured it would sting us at some point, I just hope it won't be that badly. If he ends up a 20g-20a line driver, that will be painful.
He's the NHL version of Puljujarvi. Almost never hurts to have him on the ice. Probably won't score but he'll make things hard for the other team.
Don't think this is true. Tocchet was asked about him and he said that by the time he got to coach him he was too deep in the dog house and needed a fresh start elsewhere.
Puljujarvi for Pods would've been a good swap for both sides back when Pulju was an Oiler and still had some potential.
Sometimes a situation is beyond repair that no coach can fix and itscjust best to move on.I think the difference between a good coach and a bad coach is that they make the most of the players they have and help them be successful with the team.
This sounds like the opposite of that.