Proposal: Vancouver - New Jersey

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,741
11,607
Van says no

You are probably right and that's part of the reason they are a stuck in the middle team.

Miller isn't in their long term plans anyways but getting a 2nd overall this year and a 23 first along with our first in 23 (which could be very high without Demko in net along with Holtz would be an overall net gain for the Canucks and it's not even really debatable.

Also the Canucks goaltending coach seems to do very well with their goalies.
 

Takumi3000

Registered User
Oct 3, 2005
362
120
Vancouver
Judging by the fact that neither franchises want to do this trade probably means the value is quite on par. My personal opinion is that this major shakeup would be beneficial for both franchises but neither would have the balls to do something like this
 

NJDsince90

Registered User
Jun 29, 2016
51
42
Judging by the fact that neither franchises want to do this trade probably means the value is quite on par. My personal opinion is that this major shakeup would be beneficial for both franchises but neither would have the balls to do something like this
People like to say this, but it could also mean the offer just isn't good either...
 

TBF1972

Registered User
May 19, 2018
8,351
6,831
Judging by the fact that neither franchises want to do this trade probably means the value is quite on par. My personal opinion is that this major shakeup would be beneficial for both franchises but neither would have the balls to do something like this
Trade proposal

Vancouver fan base for the New Jersey fan base

Both will hate it. Must be fair.

At the end of the day, it's three championship banner less for ex-New Jersey fans. Not fair at all.
 

HugeInTheShire

You may not like me but, I'm Huge in the Shire
Mar 8, 2021
4,420
5,842
Alberta
Zero reason for either team to accept this trade, both francizes are likely worse for making it
 

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,387
2,377
Vancouver trades:
-Miller
-Demko

New Jersey trades:
-2OV
-Holtz
-2023 1st

Why Vancouver does this:
Giving up Demko is super tough but this team is unfortunately nowhere near contention. Main fear is during Demko’s best years with his best cap hit, the team is completely neutered by all of Bennings previous mistakes. He’s too good a goalie to give us a shot at any high draft picks but the team is not good enough to challenge for the cup for the duration of his amazing contract.

Why New Jersey does this:
They get their franchise goalie and the single biggest organizational need. They also get the veteran presence in Miller to guide all their young players. You give up a lot of potential and futures but you can’t keep tanking forever either. With Demko and Miller, a NYR type turnaround is possible for the upcoming season.

These are just the core pieces going in and out but other smaller parts could be added.

No from the Canucks, also guessing it's a no from Jersey too.

Either way, no chance we give up Demko.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hisch13r and gianni

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,387
2,377
You are probably right and that's part of the reason they are a stuck in the middle team.

Miller isn't in their long term plans anyways but getting a 2nd overall this year and a 23 first along with our first in 23 (which could be very high without Demko in net along with Holtz would be an overall net gain for the Canucks and it's not even really debatable.

Also the Canucks goaltending coach seems to do very well with their goalies.
Your whole point is moot, because there is ZERO chance the Devils make this trade, also ZERO chance we get the 2nd OA or anything of that value for one year of Miller, our fanbase really needs to understand this.

Demko is the present and future in Vancouver, he is so good because of not only how he was developed but the player he was when we drafted him. These types of players don't grow on trees and can't just be developed at will by our goalie guru, it's incredibly shortsighted to think we can just find another Demko at will.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,103
10,812
I think NJD would say "Hey, what deal can we make for Demko, only". (And I'm pretty sure Vancouver isn't interested), but I don't think they want to add in Miller who will be a UFA and most likely not a guy they're signing. If they were closing to thinking "We're going to make a major run here", then maybe it's different. But I would imagine NJD to be interested in Demko without Miller attached.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyhee and Hisch13r

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
35,134
35,821
NJ
I think NJD would say "Hey, what deal can we make for Demko, only". (And I'm pretty sure Vancouver isn't interested), but I don't think they want to add in Miller who will be a UFA and most likely not a guy they're signing. If they were closing to thinking "We're going to make a major run here", then maybe it's different. But I would imagine NJD to be interested in Demko without Miller attached.

I think if we added Demko and Miller we’d actually be pretty damn good next year. We’d go from the worst goaltending in the league to having a top tier goaltender. That makes a world of a difference. Also add another top end offensive talent. At the end of the day though yeah I’d still rather just do Demko and not take the risk attached with Miller or give up the necessary assets. Demko is a part of the core 3 untouchables though so he’s going nowhere
 

hidek91

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
1,823
1,471
Warsaw, PL
Judging by the fact that neither franchises want to do this trade probably means the value is quite on par. My personal opinion is that this major shakeup would be beneficial for both franchises but neither would have the balls to do something like this

While I agree that NJ needs to fix their goaltending, the cost is insanely high here and it would be weird to make a sexy and flashy move like this before making some boring depth moves to fix their bottom six and replace Subban/upgrade Smith.
 

Eggtimer

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
15,066
12,132
Calgary Alberta
No chance Demko is traded and Demko is the only one I want to pay whats needed to get a Canucks player. No thanks to Miller unless it’s a bargain and that’s not happening .
Id overpay for Demko but once again , Canucks will not move him and I don’t blame them.
 

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
Sponsor
May 25, 2014
46,378
32,177
Vancouver trades:
-Miller
-Demko

New Jersey trades:
-2OV
-Holtz
-2023 1st

Why Vancouver does this:
Giving up Demko is super tough but this team is unfortunately nowhere near contention. Main fear is during Demko’s best years with his best cap hit, the team is completely neutered by all of Bennings previous mistakes. He’s too good a goalie to give us a shot at any high draft picks but the team is not good enough to challenge for the cup for the duration of his amazing contract.

Why New Jersey does this:
They get their franchise goalie and the single biggest organizational need. They also get the veteran presence in Miller to guide all their young players. You give up a lot of potential and futures but you can’t keep tanking forever either. With Demko and Miller, a NYR type turnaround is possible for the upcoming season.

These are just the core pieces going in and out but other smaller parts could be added.
Take Demko out of this deal and have Brock Boeser and Dermott going the other way and Id do this then. Not sure the Devils would, but could be close
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
35,134
35,821
NJ
Take Demko out of this deal and have Brock Boeser and Dermott going the other way and Id do this then. Not sure the Devils would, but could be close

No. Much rather just toss whatever money would've been used on Boeser and a Miller extension towards like Burakovsky and Gaudreau/Forsberg if that's the type of route we're taking. Still get comparable players and keep the assets.
 

Hockey 4 Life

Registered User
Feb 10, 2012
6,272
3,260
If Demko were to be made availible id hope the leafs would throw a major package at Vancouver for him.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
35,134
35,821
NJ
If Demko were to be made availible id hope the leafs would throw a major package at Vancouver for him.

If he was available that to me signals they would really be leaning into a rebuild and that'd mean we'd probably be the team with the assets they'd want most and also we'd have one of the highest needs for him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nucklehead Supreme

Hockey 4 Life

Registered User
Feb 10, 2012
6,272
3,260
If he was available that to me signals they would really be leaning into a rebuild and that'd mean we'd probably be the team with the assets they'd want most and also we'd have one of the highest needs for him
Guess it just depends on whats offered from each team.
 

zcaptain

Registered User
Apr 4, 2012
1,559
530
Zero reason for either team to accept this trade, both francizes are likely worse for making it
So adding a league top 15 scorer and a league top 5 goalie makes you worse.................LOL

Really? Give your head a shake!

Vancouver says no!
 

HugeInTheShire

You may not like me but, I'm Huge in the Shire
Mar 8, 2021
4,420
5,842
Alberta
So adding a league top 15 scorer and a league top 5 goalie makes you worse.................LOL

Really? Give your head a shake!

Vancouver says no!

Make the Devils organization worse, yes it absolutely does.

It is possible to have a trade that isn't right for either team, it may be hard to understand but trading your 3 best tradeable assets and just getting a goalie isn't good asset management.

It would make the next season better for NJ but overall is going to end up bad for them. This offer doesn't even come with an extension for Miller, so they could conceivably walk away from trading their best 3 tradeable assets for Demko and 1 year of Miller.

You do realize there is a massive difference between the NHL team and the Organization right?
 

Cogburn

Pretend they're yachts.
May 28, 2010
15,132
4,507
Vancouver
Let's move Dickinson and Pearson to Arizona for mid picks, Garland and Myers to Ottawa for a pick upgrade, and use the savings to sign Miller and Boeser. Easy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TBF1972

mlse2kk

Registered User
Apr 8, 2022
60
133
Hard pass.

Demko is untouchable (easily in the Saros/Sorokin/Hellebuyck tier of goalies) and would completely gut our G depth, rebuilding or not. After him, we have Martin/DiPietro with a combined 12 games of NHL experience. If this were to happen, we'd be right in the mix for Bedard/Michkov... not something Aquillini and co would allow to happen.
 

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,956
17,316
Ocean County
Vancouver trades:
-Miller
-Demko

New Jersey trades:
-2OV
-Holtz
-2023 1st

Why Vancouver does this:
Giving up Demko is super tough but this team is unfortunately nowhere near contention. Main fear is during Demko’s best years with his best cap hit, the team is completely neutered by all of Bennings previous mistakes. He’s too good a goalie to give us a shot at any high draft picks but the team is not good enough to challenge for the cup for the duration of his amazing contract.

Why New Jersey does this:
They get their franchise goalie and the single biggest organizational need. They also get the veteran presence in Miller to guide all their young players. You give up a lot of potential and futures but you can’t keep tanking forever either. With Demko and Miller, a NYR type turnaround is possible for the upcoming season.

These are just the core pieces going in and out but other smaller parts could be added.
God no.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad