Just went through his articles on the athletic regarding the most notable moves made 2019 summer onwards.
Ferland: He basically pointed out every concern about aging powerforwards, his concussion issues, his scoring being inflated by luck and his role offensively as a passenger on the lines he played on and how that may not necessarily translate. Oh, and he acknowledged the cap issues.
However, he still felt that it
was a worthwhile gamble just to be clear.
Micheal Ferland is a great add for Canucks at a fair cost but the signing's not without cap questions
--
Myers: Not a fan. Short term upgrade as a 4-5 that will regress into a clear cut bottom pair guy by the time the team EP/QH are on their second deals.
What to make of the Tyler Myers contract and the Canucks' blue line overhaul
--
Toffoli: his thoughts on this trade summarized by this conclusion ->
There's no doubt Tyler Toffoli will make the Canucks' top six better, but was the hefty price worth it?
--
Miller: Probably the best of all to read because he provides pretty much every point regarding leverage in the trade, Miller being an elite player, the window to contend, opportunity cost, EVERYTHING we discussed last year. I can try and summarize his thoughts. He loved the player as a fit and projected he'd easily bounce back into a 55+ point player but thought we paid a high price to make the playoffs and everything.
JT Miller is everything the Canucks need in a top-six winger -- but was the price worth it?
I provided a small snippet from each article as I'm not quite sure what the sites rules are on posting PPV content in full.
Boy genius.