Luigi Lemieux
Registered User
I like their defense but it looks like they need two top 6 forwards to move back into contender status.This is supposed to be a contending roster?
I like their defense but it looks like they need two top 6 forwards to move back into contender status.This is supposed to be a contending roster?
Myers is a good defender who is getting based on 3+ years ago, his game since Foote and Gonchar is night and day.
Forbort is fine, Soucy needs to be rocketed too the moon.
Hughes is a franchise player
Hronek is strong, but not necessarily excellent yet.
Myers is not a good defender lmao, he's a strong skater, and a solid puckmover, who has good size, but lacks hockey IQ.
Soucy might be a good defender, but he's awful everywhere else.
Forbort is baaaaaddd.
Pettersson is a great defender, good skater, solid puckmover, and underrated offensively, actually pretty productive 5on5.
I'm not sure if the Canucks....
- Have a plan, but don't know how to execute it.
- Don't have a plan, and are just winging it.
...But their moves are all over the place and they seem to lose every single trade. Bottom line...There's been a lot of talent on the roster over the past few years and they've had 2 playoff appearances in the past decade. I'm sitting way out in the cheap seats on the east coast, but even from here I can see no Canuck fan should have confidence in their management.
I am bullish on that 1st round pick. I think Pittsburgh did really well here. Knowing their luck with getting franchise players just as one is leaving, that pick will end up being McKenna..
Assuming they dont get it this year...
Watching the Rangers v the Bruins right now and if they continue to play defensively this soft that pick will be unprotected in 2026.Assuming they dont get it this year...
San Jose says helloSo, this is how Pittsburgh gets McKenna hey?
Vancouver has never been considered a contender.This is supposed to be a contending roster?
The defence is the glaring issue. Look at the offense without Miller, it was fine yesterday against Dallas. The glaring hole is defence which they are hoping to fill with Pettersson, Willander, Pettersson and Mancini.I like their defense but it looks like they need two top 6 forwards to move back into contender status.
Not a Stanley Cup contender, a wild card contender.This is supposed to be a contending roster?
Pending UFA for Pittsburgh on a downward trending team. Good offensive upside with average defensive abilities.I've seen Marcus Pettersson in trade rumours a lot, and now it happened. Can someone tell me what's the big deal about him? Haven't seen many games but stats say he's a big boy who scores 20-30p a season. Probably pretty good defesively as well for all the noise?
We are now talking about "upside" with a dude who is 28 and has 500 games in the NHL?Pending UFA for Pittsburgh on a downward trending team. Good offensive upside with average defensive abilities.
Comparable to what the Canucks were icing with Forbort, Juulsen, Desharnais and Myers. YesWe are now talking about "upside" with a dude who is 28 and has 500 games in the NHL?
His offensive “metrics” are all his transition ability. Nothing to do with offensive skill, of which he has little. When he’s playing well it’s his defense that is valuable.Pending UFA for Pittsburgh on a downward trending team. Good offensive upside with average defensive abilities.
Reliable top four D are always in demand. When a club that is needing to retool/rebuild has one of these top four D, especially a coming UFA, then other clubs will try and pry him loose. Legit top four D are hard to get.I've seen Marcus Pettersson in trade rumours a lot, and now it happened. Can someone tell me what's the big deal about him? Haven't seen many games but stats say he's a big boy who scores 20-30p a season. Probably pretty good defesively as well for all the noise?
Transition plays generate offensive plays. Which in term makes him an offensive playerHis offensive “metrics” are all his transition ability. Nothing to do with offensive skill, of which he has little. When he’s playing well it’s his defense that is valuable.
Yep, never said they weren't.Reliable top four D are always in demand. When a club that is needing to retool/rebuild has one of these top four D, especially a coming UFA, then other clubs will try and pry him loose. Legit top four D are hard to get.
Ah ok, misunderstood, i thought you meant by "upside" that he's going to get better in that department (which u did). Upside in that way is true.Comparable to what the Canucks were icing with Forbort, Juulsen, Desharnais and Myers. Yes
Upside is always going to be what a player can bring that is currently lacking.
His shot is mediocre, his offensive zone instincts are extremely simple and he’s not got the hands to carry the puck or open up space on the blueline. He’s a defensive defenseman (except this year) who isn’t incompetent offensively.Transition plays generate offensive plays. Which in term makes him an offensive player
All I'm saying is don't think trading assets for MP will be the reason he stays lol.Sure, but if there's any way to keep him it isn't by rebuilding.
Pending UFA for Pittsburgh on a downward trending team. Good offensive upside with average defensive abilities.
All I'm saying is don't think trading assets for MP will be the reason he stays lol.
But your entitled to go down this route.
Even if they retool and become a playoff team, if Hughes wants to go, Hughes is going to go. And I have no issues with that personally. Hockey players don’t owe anything to teams they play for.Yes, I understand what you're saying, but whatever chance the Canucks have at keeping Hughes long term is contingent on the team being good. If the team doesn't add and bottoms out, Hughes leaves no matter what. If Hughes still wants to leave later, even if the team is competitive, then he can be traded later.
Would you rather try and contend hoping that it makes the best defenseman in the league want to sign long-term? Or just give up, add nothing, hope for the best, and let him walk in two years.
Even if they retool and become a playoff team, if Hughes wants to go, Hughes is going to go. And I have no issues with that personally. Hockey players don’t owe anything to teams they play for.