Hodgy
Registered User
- Feb 23, 2012
- 5,218
- 5,739
I think it’s clear Miller can expect too much from his teammates, and I think it’s clear that Miller was hard on Pettersson. What you are glossing over is that, at least initially, there appears to be good reason for this. Allvin has already confirmed Pettersson was not preparing well enough and putting in the kind of effort required to succeed, and Pettersson has basically agreed. And this accords with the Halford and Brough rumour that Pettersson came into camp out of shape.And yet people keep apportioning said blame 50/50? Which is supported with... nothing. His on ice play has been poor. He's an introvert. Management states that the rift is between him and Miller, but what has he actually instigated behind the scenes? Nothing (pre rumour).
Miller was the one sent home for blowing up. Miller is known to have mistreated Pettersson (current rumour and Brad Richardson). Miller is the aggressor.
So, Pettersson isn’t this totally innocent party as you make him out to be. Players hold other players accountable. This is reasonable. And it appears that a lot of the friction came from Miller trying to hold Pettersson accountable for his lack of preparation and resulting poor play. And that in and of itself isn’t unreasonable.
Personally, I think Miller kept on being hard on Pettersson and their relationship continued to degrade, coaching staff stepped in and told him to knock it off, he didn’t, and that led to the benching and LOA.
If that’s what happened, who is more to blame? Personally, I blame both. I still like Pettersson’s personality more, but I don’t really blame Miller in that context, at least initially. Pettersson sort of started the problem, and Miler certainly ended it. Lots of blame to go around.
Cam Robinson specifically cites Demko and Hughes as being tired with Miller's antics. Is there any such player specific report for Pettersson?
I think it’s clear Miller expects a lot of his teammates and is hard on them. And he’s a strong personality. It seems also clear that he’s popular in the room.
We know that management loved Miller's preparation, drive and production. But they knew his personality too. They still prioritized his offseason re-signing over Horvat (fact).
That’s actually not a fact. The only fact is that they signed Miller and traded Horvat. And I have already given reasons for why that may have been. You don’t need to read in prioritization, although that may have been the case.
They may have wanted both, but thought more of Miller. They then let his personality loose on Pettersson. This is with the Horvat vs Miller rumour as the backdrop. Few have questioned management's judgement here. And yet, they're the proper litmus test to Pettersson's preparation? Don't make me laugh.
I mean, that’s just a rumour. And if it’s true, it’s more likely that it was coaching vs. management. But I agree it would be a dumb thing to do in the context if true. Personally, I doubt it, given how long this issue has been going on for.
Nobody dared talk about Pettersson's preparation when he put up 102 points as a twig. Unprepared.
I mean, he easily could have become complacent after that season or signing his big contract. Just because your are mentally dialed in and preparing at one point doesn’t mean you always will.
This just seems like a conspiracy theory that’s not really worth addressing on its merits.This is just about management controlling for the minor injury impacts he may be suffering. It's his play they want back. It's not about converting Pettersson from a bad teammate to a good one.