-
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Proposal: VAN-LA-CHI
- Thread starter MicronMega
- Start date
Peter Griffin
Registered User
Vancouver says no too.
unicornpig
Registered User
Lol
Two ver good prospects and 1st for demko lol. No wonder Vancouver is in the shits
Lt Dan
F*** your ice cream!
Peter Griffin
Registered User
Vancouver really doesn’t need more small wingers. They do however need an NHL starting goaltender.
Steve Zissou
I'll order you a red cap and a Speedo.
Empoleon8771
Registered User
Okay, let's break this down for each team:
Vancouver trades Demko and Martin for Fagemo, Mrazek, TB's 1st, Harding and Cromiak
Los Angeles trades Petersen, Byfield, Fagemo and Chromiak for Demko, McCabe and Johnson
Chicago trades McCabe, Mrazek, TB's 1st and Harding for Petersen, Byfield and Martin
To me, Vancouver is clearly coming out like bandits. LA and Chicago are hard to gauge because it really depends on how you value Byfield. If you don't value Byfield that highly, Chicago is getting destroyed in this deal by trading McCabe and a 1st for him while also having to take Petersen's contract. If you value Byfield highly, LA is trading an extremely valuable piece for a quantity return.
Vancouver trades Demko and Martin for Fagemo, Mrazek, TB's 1st, Harding and Cromiak
Los Angeles trades Petersen, Byfield, Fagemo and Chromiak for Demko, McCabe and Johnson
Chicago trades McCabe, Mrazek, TB's 1st and Harding for Petersen, Byfield and Martin
To me, Vancouver is clearly coming out like bandits. LA and Chicago are hard to gauge because it really depends on how you value Byfield. If you don't value Byfield that highly, Chicago is getting destroyed in this deal by trading McCabe and a 1st for him while also having to take Petersen's contract. If you value Byfield highly, LA is trading an extremely valuable piece for a quantity return.
MicronMega
Registered User
You are only allowed to like things, love them, and smile all the time. That's an order.
To the OP: What are you smoking?
RocketKing
Registered User
What a ridiculous trade from LAs POV.
EddieTheEagle
Registered User
This ain't it.
mriswith
Registered User
Van easily says no. Chi would be laughing if they could swing it.
And LA isn't trading Byfield. I don't know why people think he's on the block, he's pretty much developing exactly as expected when drafted and is having a good year.
Sorry LA fans
JoeSakic13
Registered User
That’s a lot to land Stanley Cup Champion Jack Johnson, but I guess that’s the going rate.
McJedi
Registered User
Don’t like this for LA. Petersen needs to be dumped or bought out another way.
Cogburn
Pretend they're yachts.
Two small winger prospects aren't something we covet, no matter how "very good" they are. We're swamped with wingers, winger prospects, and are actively trying to move NHL level wingers, apparently. You have center and right handed defense prospects, those are what we want and need, which is clearly established at this point. A goaltender prospect I can best describe as "mild" doesn't sway us either.
A late first (very late first according to the OP) is of some interest, but not enough for Demko.
Oh, and we take on Mrazek and his cap hit for next year too. He's statistically worse then Martin, for more than 5 times his cap hit, and it's not that Martin has been a world beater this year. Martin just got waived, and after being lit up behind our junkyard fire of a defense, Mrazek will still have cap hit we need to work around when he is sent down to back up Silovs.
I don't want to comment on behalf of Blackhawks fans, but I don't like it for them either.
A late first (very late first according to the OP) is of some interest, but not enough for Demko.
Oh, and we take on Mrazek and his cap hit for next year too. He's statistically worse then Martin, for more than 5 times his cap hit, and it's not that Martin has been a world beater this year. Martin just got waived, and after being lit up behind our junkyard fire of a defense, Mrazek will still have cap hit we need to work around when he is sent down to back up Silovs.
I don't want to comment on behalf of Blackhawks fans, but I don't like it for them either.
