This doesn't mean we're stuck at all. We're right where we would be anyway, with Miller locked up long term, instead of taking a crap proposal and using cap space which....we still aren't hurting for yet (next year we have 15+ million, more with Poolman on LTIR).
I'd rather have had news of a trade for a defender, but this isn't bad news.
Also, is this 7 years at 8 million, or 8 years at 7 million, different sources are saying different things.
1 year in and it's already looking like bad news lol
Wow, we sign our arguably best player, heart and soul guy, sandpaper carries guys into the fight, the young guys look up to him to a good AAV ok a little long and all the bitter bros. Can't handle it.
Lmao you mean doesn't fit YOUR timeline. You "expert" fans are too much
Lmao you mean doesn't fit YOUR timeline. You "expert" fans are too much
Well, you my good friend deserve this timeline. You deserve the product that is being put out on the ice today.
I don't get this "it doesn't fit our timeline" nonsense.........seriously............our window is now. Really puzzling to think otherwise unless we are going to rebuild. Disagree completely.
Our window is now? If icing a below .500 team is our window...yeesh. You deserve the product that is being put out on the ice today.
Vancouver's cap situation doesn't make this contract a disaster. The SITUATION is close to a disaster, yes, but this is a good contract.
Situation is a disaster, yes, but this is a BAD contract.
An extended Miller at below market value is arguably a more valuable trade asset today than he was yesterday.
Not saying he’s going to be dealt but any word on a NT/NM clause?
12th in nhl scoring over the past 3 seasons.
50th in cap hit.
Well done Allvin
Well done Allvin! Who could've thought that the contract wouldn't take 4 years to start aging badly, but under 4 months.
Things don't happen in a vacuum in the NHL. It's more like slow dominoes. Sometimes what you need just isn't there. When you try to force those things, that's when you end up being a Jim Benning.
If I am to speculate, the Canucks understand the imbalance of the current roster. Allvin said they didn't like the UFA market for RHD and from all we can tell and speculate, the offers for Miller weren't near enticing enough to meet his value. In my mind, they have done the right thing here and kicked the can (a top 4 RHD) down the road because they didn't like the solutions they could find this off-season. It doesn't mean they are stuck.
Canucks have an excess of forwards and especially wingers on paper. However, there are some unknowns in that group. They now have the chance to evaluate those players to see if someone makes someone else expendable and therefore very tradeable. I think Hoglander is already in the very tradeable group and either Mikheyev or Kuzmenko could prove to make Garland very tradeable as well.
If the Canucks had traded Miller for help on D now, they would have fixed a problem by creating a new one. That usually doesn't move you very far ahead and if anything would make your team "stuck".
When you try to force these things? The direction of the team mattered back then as much as it does today. Having a 1st + Lundkvist (Who recently got dealt for a 1st) + Chytil would have served this team far, far better than JT Miller has.
Do you think they would be closer trading Miller for futures?
There's some amazing comedy in the people saying this is a bad deal. It's pretty obvious there was no good deal on the table, and in the current market, I doubt they were even mediocre deals on the table.
With that said, all these ppl complaining "iT's NoT tHeIr tImE"...
Would you rather lose JT Miller for nothing next year, or have him sign this contract ?
I would've rather have taken the best deal available for JT, than sign him to the albatross of a deal he is now on that we've heard journalists come on local radio saying he has essentially JT Miller.