archangel2
Registered User
- May 19, 2019
- 2,996
- 1,853
Like the fact people suddenly realized it was a deal done for the playoffs.
It was just such a bad trade for us. The only one I really blame Conroy for. Hanifin trade was bad too, but we were in a tough spot there with how his agent handled things. Zadorov is a unique player. He does have some blunders, but he makes some good plays too. You just don't find that combo of skating ability, size and physicality too often. I felt we should have gotten a 2nd and 3rd for him, but we rushed it because of the trade request and locker room dynamic.Z seems like he really wanted to stay in Van, his favorite team growing up, and turned into a locker room leader on top of providing on ice presence, top 4 level D and clutch scoring. Tocchet knows how to utilize his big men.
He had his pouty pants on in Calgary since the start of last season. It cost him 30M+. He's still a guy who can do everything you need him to though. I don't think he ever scores 40 again, but he can get 30 with the right linemates and 20 with 3rd liners.That's the Lindholm the Canucks were hoping to see and need to see on a game to game basis. Full marks. He was great last night. He's a beast when he's fully engaged - he just needs to find that consistently now and if he does, the Canucks are in a great spot.
He had his pouty pants on in Calgary since the start of last season. It cost him 30M+. He's still a guy who can do everything you need him to though. I don't think he ever scores 40 again, but he can get 30 with the right linemates and 20 with 3rd liners.
This really aged well.........Really bad trade for the Nucks.
Lindholm has been good since returning from some missed games, and was a good target to upgrade the 3C position, but that's not the price they paid nor the intended position he'd fill.
Nucks were weak at the wing before the trade, and now that hole is massive. It also doesn't help the C depth, cause now Pettersson is completely useless without his play driver.
This team was bottom 10 in scoring before Kuz, and went right back to that the day he was traded.
Zadorov, Suter, Blueger, Lafferty, Cole, Hronek etc. The list goes on for moves made to address the overall D and PK. Why the FFFF would you trade away one of your top offensive catalysts and leading goal scorer from the previous year!?
We now have half a dozen wingers, that are combined for ZERO goals in the last 20-30 games.
They traded away the exact skillset they are now missing, in the name of '2 way play'.
Toch should have been strong armed into giving Kuz more rope, or at least a move needed to be made to address the winger void after.
Uh, yes? The PP still is awful, and EP line has zero goals through the playoffs. It's nice that they have won in spite of that though, hopefully can keep going.This really aged well.........
Uh, yes? The PP still is awful, and EP line has zero goals through the playoffs. It's nice that they have won in spite of that though, hopefully can keep going.
Not complaining about targeting Lindholm, who has been real good, All of the Canucks board is up in arms over EP's lack of wingers, and yet somehow praises trading away his best winger...
Don't believe for a second this move couldn't have been done without using Mikeyev+ instead. The team would have 3 legit scoring lines.
This wasn't a 1 for 1 deal, and needs to be judged on team performance, over 1 player.
Lol 'winning system'.So the guy who played like shit this year and had 8 goals, repeat 8 goals in 43 games would somehow change that?
Kuz doesn't play well in a winning system, he doesn't. I'll sacrifice that small portion of scoring for the piece of mind that my top 6 winger isn't gonna disappear in his own zone.
Yes, in a structured system built for winning he sucks.Lol 'winning system'.
Kuz has more goals than any Canuck winger since joining the league, and finished 2nd only to Boeser this year. Hardly a small sacrifice.
Hard to mock a sophomore half season slump, when we have several wingers COMBINING for less goals over more time. That's disappearing.
Even if you believe Kuz had to go, he needed to be replaced. Team has a huge hole on the W since this trade.
Crazy how many had to eat crow on saying the same things about Boeser + Hoglander, just moving onto the next scape goat.
Do you want to win or watch goals? You win with Lindholm, you get to watch goals with Kuzmenko. Since the Lindholm trade the Flames are a much worse team despite scoring the same amount of goals.Lol 'winning system'.
Kuz has more goals than any Canuck winger since joining the league, and finished 2nd only to Boeser this year. Hardly a small sacrifice.
Hard to mock a sophomore half season slump, when we have several wingers COMBINING for less goals over more time. That's disappearing.
Even if you believe Kuz had to go, he needed to be replaced. Team has a huge hole on the W since this trade.
Crazy how many had to eat crow on saying the same things about Boeser + Hoglander, just moving onto the next scape goat.
It is also looks like he finally remembered he has to sign a new contract lolHe had his pouty pants on in Calgary since the start of last season. It cost him 30M+. He's still a guy who can do everything you need him to though. I don't think he ever scores 40 again, but he can get 30 with the right linemates and 20 with 3rd liners.
Uh, yes? The PP still is awful, and EP line has zero goals through the playoffs. It's nice that they have won in spite of that though, hopefully can keep going.
Not complaining about targeting Lindholm, who has been real good, All of the Canucks board is up in arms over EP's lack of wingers, and yet somehow praises trading away his best winger...
Don't believe for a second this move couldn't have been done without using Mikeyev+ instead. The team would have 3 legit scoring lines.
This wasn't a 1 for 1 deal, and needs to be judged on team performance, over 1 player.
He got plenty of time with EP this year and he was awful, contributed negatively by being a detriment defensively, only reason he was moved.I don't think it's absurd or wrong at all to believe the Canucks would be an even better team today if Kuzmenko was playing alongside Pettersson and not Mikheyev.. Those two had an established chemistry and very productive run over a large sample size.. Tocchet elected to go away from that pairing and that's when Kuzmenko struggled in a role he's not suited for. Pettersson needs more talent to play with. That much is obvious.
Hows the humble pie?Should be able to close the book on this fleecing pretty soon here.
Not that I needed to wait, I knew Lindholm was extremely overrated before the trade.
You're responding to maybe the worst poster on the forum. Unless the Oilers get more than 3 PPs per game, this will be a short series for the Canucks.Hows the humble pie?
I don't doubt Flames valued Kuz, but I think a deal gets done with Mikeyev+, at least gotta try. This is the year to go all in, and they half assed. Now gonna have 2 holes in the offseason as EL is a rental contract.I don't think it's absurd or wrong at all to believe the Canucks would be an even better team today if Kuzmenko was playing alongside Pettersson and not Mikheyev.. Those two had an established chemistry and very productive run over a large sample size.. Tocchet elected to go away from that pairing and that's when Kuzmenko struggled in a role he's not suited for. Pettersson needs more talent to play with. That much is obvious.
In saying that, I actually don't believe Calgary would have made that trade if it was Mikheyev instead of Kuzmenko. I truly do believe Conroy placed a value on acquiring Kuzmenko.
He got plenty of time with EP this year and he was awful, contributed negatively by being a detriment defensively, only reason he was moved.
We are not a better team with him in the lineup. Especially in the playoffs, where Kuz would be even more of a detriment.
Kuz can score and brings some tools for sure, but in his current form, he isn’t a player you can win with or trust.Lol 'winning system'.
Kuz has more goals than any Canuck winger since joining the league, and finished 2nd only to Boeser this year. Hardly a small sacrifice.
Hard to mock a sophomore half season slump, when we have several wingers COMBINING for less goals over more time. That's disappearing.
Even if you believe Kuz had to go, he needed to be replaced. Team has a huge hole on the W since this trade.
Crazy how many had to eat crow on saying the same things about Boeser + Hoglander, just moving onto the next scape goat.
Correlation doesn’t mean causation. Petey also signed a new contract and may be struggling with the expectations.Personally, I don't think you can definitively say that. Tocc may not have liked the player but the data suggests that Kuzmenko/Pettersson were a high end pair together (even to begin the year). Dating back to the start of February - Pettersson has just 7 goals, 21 assists, 28 points, +2 in 41 games which is far, far worse than the production he had at any point with Kuzmenko.
Lindholm is soooo good! He honestly reminds me of Patrice Bergeron. Always on the right spot, elite defensively and very high IQ. Nothing flashy.
I dont know if the Canucks can afford him, but id love to re-sign him long term.
His game is built for a 7 game series.
Im not buying this 'can't win with' stuff. The entire core underachieved for years and were given that label.Kuz can score and brings some tools for sure, but in his current form, he isn’t a player you can win with or trust.
Correlation doesn’t mean causation. Petey also signed a new contract and may be struggling with the expectations.
Im not buying this 'can't win with' stuff. The entire core underachieved for years and were given that label.
Pretty much the whole Nucks board is in agreement, the PP sucks, and EP needs a winger. We had that guy, who wanted to be here, and had cost certainty for next season. We are even firing up the trade Mikeyev thread. No hindsight needed for the problems we have now.
Tocc just had a beef with Kuz, pretty much every coach in the league has some weird issue with a good player, and love affair for a plug or two.
Im enjoying the ride, but we are damn lucky to be able to discuss Lindholm vs the Oilers, when the EP line and PP almost cost the Nashville series.
Personally, I don't think you can definitively say that. Tocc may not have liked the player but the data suggests that Kuzmenko/Pettersson were a high end pair together (even to begin the year). Dating back to the start of February - Pettersson has just 7 goals, 21 assists, 28 points, +2 in 41 games which is far, far worse than the production he had at any point with Kuzmenko.
i agree with this and the highlighted is most certainly the biggest reason why Kuzmenko was moved. Tocc wanted buy in and you can bet your ass that Kuzmenko and the Bali shenanigans while others were busting their asses to get better last off season didn't sit well.Im not buying this 'can't win with' stuff. The entire core underachieved for years and were given that label.
Pretty much the whole Nucks board is in agreement, the PP sucks, and EP needs a winger. We had that guy, who wanted to be here, and had cost certainty for next season. We are even firing up the trade Mikeyev thread. No hindsight needed for the problems we have now.
Tocc just had a beef with Kuz, pretty much every coach in the league has some weird issue with a good player, and love affair for a plug or two.
Im enjoying the ride, but we are damn lucky to be able to discuss Lindholm vs the Oilers, when the EP line and PP almost cost the Nashville series.