Proposal: Value of San Jose 2025 1st

BHFAN92

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
247
374
Mid-West
with Grier sounding at least open to trading the pick what would be some offers that would be acceptable? Hypothetical San Jose lands #1 ova what would it take?
 
I knew that this thread was going to appear soon after reading GMMG's comments. I am prepared to be thoroughly underwhelmed by the offers that are proposed on here.
If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
 
You just want the Hawks to find a way to get it without winning the lotto and getting eliminated from moving up in the lotto next year. I'm on to what you're doing...


But 0 chance here.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BHFAN92
If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
Jeez I like Schaefer but is the difference between him and Martone/Hagens that big?

Unless Chicago is targeting Misa with that pick, in which case I'd imagine you can get him at 2
 
They say this to keep the door open just in case but it's probably not happening.

If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
And this definitely isn't happening. Blackhawks need more good young players more than they need to move up two spots in a draft that doesn't seem particularly strong and doesn't have a #1 that is heads and shoulders above everyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrfenn92
By the comparisons he used, it sounds like he would trade the pick for a massive haul.

The Predators and Flyers both have two late 1sts and multiple 2nds, on top of their top 5 picks. What I assume he meant by the Ricky Williams+Herschel Walker example is that he would trade down for a massive quantity of picks.

In 2013, the Flames offers Colorado 6th, 22nd, and 28th for 1st. Maybe something like that.
 
If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks

I’m a big believer there’s no substitute for elite talent. When that elite talent perfectly slots into our team needs (#1 D or LW/C to pair with Smith), both of whom are elite skaters, give me Schaefer or Misa. Include Rinzel (or Lev) instead of Korchinski and that changes things dramatically. I know the Hawks wouldn’t do that.

There’s been a bit of discussion on the sharks board about whether we’d trade Schaefer for McKenna. It’s close, neither one is the type of player you can acquire. I think Schaefer and a top forward in 26 gives us a core that could win cups. McKenna, Celebrini, Smith, Eklund, and Cherny would be ridiculous, but we’d still be hunting for a 1D.

Note: edited autocorrect from Lev to Alec. No we don’t want Martinez!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sendhelp2Anaheim
They say this to keep the door open just in case but it's probably not happening.


And this definitely isn't happening. Blackhawks need more good young players more than they need to move up two spots in a draft that doesn't seem particularly strong and doesn't have a #1 that is heads and shoulders above everyone else.
I 100% disagree..Matthew Schaefer is that dude.
 
If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
Why? Remember the year everyone thought the Avs got screwed, they got Makar at 4. The year the Rangers got Lafreniere, the Sens got Stutzle at 3. Who do you love enough to risk it?
 
If they get 1ov, they take Schaeffer. Schaeffer is who they need.

If they get 2nd OV and they know 100% whoever gets 1ov is taking Schaeffer, then there could be a discussion if a team has a premium young dman and wants Misa. Buffalo and Owen Power?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Patty Ice
Is the idea to trade it so they can better position themselves for McKenna?
Why would our pick this year be of any relevance to our chances of picking #1 next year? Whoever we're drafting isn't going to take this team out of the basement in one season.
 
If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks

That's more than enough, but I think it would be a mistake since in my opinion. Matt Schaefer is one of the final pieces that San Jose is going to need if they want to be a contender.
 
if you actually read the quote he uses the Herschel Walker trade as an example. In that trade, Dallas got 3 firsts, 3 2nds, a third and a 6th. So basically Grier said “it’s available but it’s going to cost your entire future”
 
If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
Nope not even close. Korchinski is pretty bad. Make it 3rd overall + Levshunov for 1st overall otherwise no thanks.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad