If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picksI knew that this thread was going to appear soon after reading GMMG's comments. I am prepared to be thoroughly underwhelmed by the offers that are proposed on here.
Jeez I like Schaefer but is the difference between him and Martone/Hagens that big?If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
Schaefer is top tier and then drop off to Misa and then big drop off to Martone/Frondell/HagensJeez I like Schaefer but is the difference between him and Martone/Hagens that big?
Unless Chicago is targeting Misa with that pick, in which case I'd imagine you can get him at 2
And this definitely isn't happening. Blackhawks need more good young players more than they need to move up two spots in a draft that doesn't seem particularly strong and doesn't have a #1 that is heads and shoulders above everyone else.If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
I agree its a pipe dream...but their GM brought it up so worth speculatingWho cares, Sharks are not trading the pick and if they do, they would want too much anyway....everyone save your breath.
If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
I 100% disagree..Matthew Schaefer is that dude.They say this to keep the door open just in case but it's probably not happening.
And this definitely isn't happening. Blackhawks need more good young players more than they need to move up two spots in a draft that doesn't seem particularly strong and doesn't have a #1 that is heads and shoulders above everyone else.
Why? Remember the year everyone thought the Avs got screwed, they got Makar at 4. The year the Rangers got Lafreniere, the Sens got Stutzle at 3. Who do you love enough to risk it?If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
Why would our pick this year be of any relevance to our chances of picking #1 next year? Whoever we're drafting isn't going to take this team out of the basement in one season.Is the idea to trade it so they can better position themselves for McKenna?
If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks
There is absolutely no chance they trade 1st OA if they get it.with Grier sounding at least open to trading the pick what would be some offers that would be acceptable? Hypothetical San Jose lands #1 ova what would it take?
They're still in the best position.Is the idea to trade it so they can better position themselves for McKenna?
Nope not even close. Korchinski is pretty bad. Make it 3rd overall + Levshunov for 1st overall otherwise no thanks.If San Jose lands #1 and Blackhawks land #3 would pick swap, Toronto's 1st in 2025, Florida's 1st in 2026 and Korchinski be enough for San Jose to move back 2 spots? They land a top 4 young dman, still have #3 overall plus pick up two more 1st rd picks