Euro Twins
Healthy Scratch
- Mar 19, 2016
- 1,306
- 1,334
How do I submit my application for team logo?
Krakens are real unlike birds and AustraliaOne team with a far fetched creature (Kraken) is enough.
Exactly! Only actual animals like a wheel with a giant wing on it!!One team with a far fetched creature (Kraken) is enough.
Not sure which would be worse…Kraken or Yeti?One team with a far fetched creature (Kraken) is enough.
The best option would have been the Utah Coyotes, keeping the colours and all from PHX/ARZ, but I can see why the current ownership choose to keep this in case of expansion.
I don't like the "Yeti", because it feels too cartoonish (we have enough of that with Kraken and Predators). I don't like Blizzard or any other weather phenomena, because of Avalanche, Hurricanes and Lightning already exist.
With the "Utah Coyotes" off the table, a wild west theme would be a nice add to the league. Don't like the "Pioneers" or "Explorers", though. Maybe the "Gunslingers" or "Outlaws". "Outlaws" would also be somewhat humorous considering that SLC is heavily associated with religiousness.
They're billionaires. They've never cared for anything beyond money. Otherwise they wouldn't be billionaires.Agreed. Keeping it the Coyotes seems like the obvious choice.
If the owners expand beyond 32 teams, it will be final confirmation they don't give a shit about hockey and it's all about the money (to go along with the 100 other confirmations of this).
It's been all about money for a very long time now. No final confirmation necessary.If the owners expand beyond 32 teams, it will be final confirmation they don't give a shit about hockey and it's all about the money (to go along with the 100 other confirmations of this).
I hate it. Too Euro for me(sorry fellas!) I just wish like everyone else they got to keep the name, colors, etc of Arizona.I'm sure I am the only one who actually likes The Utah Hockey Club.
Stomping foot, creating an avalanche is how I always saw it anyway.Don't the Avalanche incorporate yeti elements on their shoulder patch?
It's a little more than that.My understanding is that they can't be the Coyotes anymore because they gave the rights to that name to the former owner of the Coyotes who is now trying to bring hockey back to Arizona. They should have just let them keep using Coyotes until the Coyotes came back to Arizona, or until they decided on a Utah name they wanted to keep indefinitely.
Oh god. The Arizona saga will never be over. Gary will never allow it.It's a little more than that.
The "franchise" didn't relocate to Utah, only the players and some staff, etc. This includes minor league assets, prospects, etc. The "Coyotes", as a franchise, has been made dormant by the league, and Alex Meruelo has a five year window to acquire land and get the arena completed.
If current reporting is correct, he has until next April to actually acquire the land he needs, and the arena needs to be at least half finished by 31 December 2027. If it's at that point on or before that date, he can pay back the $1bn to the NHL and start the expansion draft process. If all this happens, the team should resume play in time for the 2029-2030 season, with the actual expansion draft occurring in the summer of 2029.
There's no word yet on what happens to the remains of the Coyotes franchise should Meruelo fail, but if I had to guess, it would go to the league until someone steps up, builds a barn, and pays the $1bn (or more?) to resurrect the Coyotes in Phoenix.
It's a lot less about Gary, and a lot more about the owners. The league wants teams in every large market, and now three of the top ten media markets are without teams. Rest assured, Meruelo doesn't have an endless timeline out there.Oh god. The Arizona saga will never be over. Gary will never allow it.
If he doesn't hit these 5 target dates he can just restart the process....