BKarchitect
Registered User
Powder blue and black is a smart choice. It’ll be a unique look for the NHL.
The logos are purposefully generic but the font is sharp both for “Utah” and “Hockey Club” - the slanted H bar is a fun touch. I imagine the fonts could be an element that carries forward into the full branding.
I also think that Utah silhouette logo is an obvious “start of concept” for the real secondary/shoulder logo.
The emphasis early on in the branding process has likely been the colors and overall feel - applied to some basic graphics. I think you’ll see that carry forward into the full brand which will want to be an evolution of this generic work instead of a severely disassociated and entirely different look a year from now. It just needs the name and associated graphics.
The logos are purposefully generic but the font is sharp both for “Utah” and “Hockey Club” - the slanted H bar is a fun touch. I imagine the fonts could be an element that carries forward into the full branding.
I also think that Utah silhouette logo is an obvious “start of concept” for the real secondary/shoulder logo.
The emphasis early on in the branding process has likely been the colors and overall feel - applied to some basic graphics. I think you’ll see that carry forward into the full brand which will want to be an evolution of this generic work instead of a severely disassociated and entirely different look a year from now. It just needs the name and associated graphics.