Halakitlikethat
Registered User
Hockey Club shouldn’t even be an option. Am I taking crazy pills? It’s stupid to even have it this season.
Of those 3 I am rooting for another conflicting trademark claim.
Does anybody call them the "Montreal HC"? No! It's the Montreal Canadiens. Does anybody call Toronto the "Toronto HC" ("Toronto Maple Leaf Hockey Club" is their official name by the way)? No! It's the Toronto Maple Leafs.Bruh aren’t you a habs fan? What do you think the letters on their jersey stand for
Hockey Club shouldn’t even be an option. Am I taking crazy pills? It’s stupid to even have it this season.
Hockey Club shouldn’t even be an option. Am I taking crazy pills? It’s stupid to even have it this season.
point being that its not something they stole from soccer, it’s a name that goes back to the origins of pro hockey.Does anybody call them the "Montreal HC"? No! It's the Montreal Canadiens. Does anybody call Toronto the "Toronto HC" ("Toronto Maple Leaf Hockey Club" is their official name by the way)? No! It's the Toronto Maple Leafs.
What a dumb reply.
To be fair to real salt lake, the territory was spanish before it was american. At leaat southern Utah was. Not sure if you'd say they really controlled it but they did consider it part do their territory and they did trade thereThose are better than Jazz and Real Salt Lake (wtf there's no royalty in Utah and why Spanish, is it just because they thought Real Madrid was cool?)... but they aren't better by much.
Setting aside the issue of good taste, consider this:
Given the epidemic of school shootings in this country, there are plenty of middle/high schools where students are barred from wearing clothing on campus with depictions of guns.
With that in mind, do you think it would be a good idea for your business to prominently feature a handgun in its logo if your goal is to maximize revenue by selling merchandise and apparel to young people?
I kind of agree. "Hockey Club" obviously doesn't align at all with the NA sports teams naming traditions so it looks a bit out of place but I actually really like the simple elegance of the name. It's both vanilla and very bold at the same time. Heck, maybe it can even set a precedent for other new teams.Utah HC would be the best name in the league, no kidding. North American sport team names are so juvenile and sad, aside from a few classics that actually have historical or environmental ties to the team location. The league would look a lot more serious with Vancouver HC, New York HC, Edmonton HC, Colorado HC.
Seriously. The 'Ducks'. The 'Flames'. The 'Coyotes'. The 'Penguins'. At least the Pittsburgh Steelers have historic reasons to be named Steelers. Same with the Red Wings. Most of these dumb names are just forced.
L
point being that its not something they stole from soccer, it’s a name that goes back to the origins of pro hockey.
Honestly its the “Utah” part that sucks.
way too bland and generic, should be something like Salt Lake HC/hockey club
They were trying to have it both ways and appeal to pretentious soccer jags for the year.I'll never understand how someone has a billion dollars ready to buy a hockey team, but doesn't have a name ready for that very hockey team. I thought getting the billion dollars would have been the hard part...
I live here. In Canada we have an 8 team football league (CFL) that had two teams
Saskatchewan Rough Riders and The
Ottawa Rough Riders.
Considering at one point a full 25% of a professional league was named the rough riders im sure we could work something out
I really like the outlaws, but I agree. I'm sure the league will be super involved to ensure the logos wouldn't be too menacing. And it's an unfortunate guarantee no logo will include a gun, despite the usual outlaw being portrayed as a wild west era gunslinger. God forbid we have a cartoon image of a gun, it will be directly responsible for the next act of gun violence of course.
I'll never understand how someone has a billion dollars ready to buy a hockey team, but doesn't have a name ready for that very hockey team. I thought getting the billion dollars would have been the hard part...
I also don't get the "uniqueness" people are saying for Utah Hockey Club. People are aware that soccer teams still have nicknames, right? Liverpool FC are the Reds, Man United are the Red Devils, Arsenal FC are the Gunners. Seems like Utah should still have some sort of nickname even if they go with UHC.So why not just skip the Hockey Club part and go right to the nickname?
My vote would have been Outlaws, but I guess I go with Mammoth, which I'll just always pronounce as Mammoths, for the same reason others have pointed out we don't call them the Anaheim Duck.
Edit: Nice to see Outlaws back in the mix! Now just have to hope it wasn't a typo and they're going with Utah Outlaw!
Who cares if they stole it from soccer or not? It's a stupid, generic name and at least they had enough sense not to call themselves "HC".L
point being that its not something they stole from soccer, it’s a name that goes back to the origins of pro hockey.
Honestly its the “Utah” part that sucks.
way too bland and generic, should be something like Salt Lake HC/hockey club
Wait, what should The Flames be then? The Calgary Martin Luther King Jr.'s? The burning of Atlanta was a pretty big historical deal.Utah HC would be the best name in the league, no kidding. North American sport team names are so juvenile and sad, aside from a few classics that actually have historical or environmental ties to the team location. The league would look a lot more serious with Vancouver HC, New York HC, Edmonton HC, Colorado HC.
Seriously. The 'Ducks'. The 'Flames'. The 'Coyotes'. The 'Penguins'. At least the Pittsburgh Steelers have historic reasons to be named Steelers. Same with the Red Wings. Most of these dumb names are just forced.
does that really matter? like New York Jets didn't get in the way of Winnipeg using Jets, multiple times.Las Vegas Knights wouldn't gotten approved by the trademark board cause there's a hockey team in canada that uses knights.