Useless thread MMII: Juan Soto & Zack Hample appreciation thread

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Tuddy: You know this kid?
Postman: Yeah.
Tuddy: You know where he lives?
Postman: Yeah.
Tuddy: You deliver mail to his house?
Postman: Yeah.
Tuddy: Well, from now on, any letter from that school to that kid's house comes
directly here. You understand? Another letter from that school goes to that
kid's house: in the f***in' oven you're gonna go head first!
 
Goodfellas is on MAX i just checked at home

Gonna spare the UT a running commentary of the film tomorrow morning during "work" hours and instead download the movie for plane watching later :)

For a guy who moved all day long, Paulie didn't talk to six people. If their was a union problem, or say, a beef in the numbers and only the top guys could meet with Paulie to discuss the problem. Everything was one-on-one. Paulie hated conferences.
 
1741085273330.png


In typical NHL fashion, that makes no f***ing sense and they would look less stupid by just saying nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Price
If a player has a history of doing a certain action, it only makes sense to consider his history and stop giving him the benefit of the doubt when he keeps doing it.

If the situation can only be explained by "He didn't do it on purpose, he just really sucks at skating", then he's playing recklessly and not adequately controlling his body, which is exactly why you shouldn't ignore his history.

It's akin to the idiotic circular logic as a repeat offender never receiving a suspension because they don't have a history with the DoPS. Either make the decision to hand out a punishment, or do nothing and watch it inevitably happen again.
 
Last edited:
stupid body wakes up at the slightest speck of light but at least Japanese baseball is playing
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad