Fossy21
Nobel Prize Deke
- Mar 14, 2013
- 20,277
- 2,350
As long as you touch the puck its not a highstick penalty.
Patently false
As long as you touch the puck its not a highstick penalty.
Very boring game. Uncharacteristic for wjhc finals
The officials have had nothing to do with this game.You scored on a 6 on 5, don't be disingenuous. As much of a penalty as that was, yours earlier was twice as much of one, and was never reviewed.
It is how the refs have called it all tournament, so you must be wrong.Patently false
Cheeky bugger.Worse he’d freeze the bodies so time of death was harder to determine
If Hutson scores, this crowd will flood the building with their tears.
Not sure where you are getting at??Very boring game. Uncharacteristic for wjhc finals
It's unusual because it's not anglicized. If he went though Ellis Island with that name in 1890, he'd be Zev Benjamin.That’s a very unusual name.
Sounds like a town in the Roman Empire.
It is how the refs have called it all tournament, so you must be wrong.
Major penalties are checked, and that is every one.
These kids move the puck way better than my islanders on the PP
They also don't get pressured as muchThese kids move the puck way better than my islanders on the PP
I was just thinking, they could show the Canucks a thing or 2
Finns might take that as compliment..Says Stockholm below your name. So I went with the Swedish insult. I can change it to one about Alcoholism if you prefer
Again it is how the refs have called it, if you touched the puck it has been no penalty, if you missed the puck it has been a penalty.Taking a wild swing at a bouncing puck is not a follow-through. So you are blatantly wrong.
A shot attempt is a follow-through, that's the point…Again it is how the refs have called it, if you touched the puck it has been no penalty, if you missed the puck it has been a penalty.
Happened with the Canadians and that was on an actual shot attempt where the puck bounced last second.