In fairness... Norway played a better match against the US then Switzerland.Yeah, I was just joking a bit. I also have Switzerland as the favorite against Norway, but I don't think the difference is that huge as you seem to think. I would say 60/40 Switzerland.
I'm a bit worried for the Czechs after losing so many defensemen but if they start Hrabal I think they have a chance. Same goes for the Slovaks who have the best goalie of the tournament. The US are a good team and their offense is relentless but if you don't give them any free goals to start the game I think that, with good goaltending and the ability to win battles, it's possible to not bleed too much defensively. And the US aren't all that solid defensively themselves.Calling it, Norway to have played the closest game with US by the end of the tournament.
On TSN they described him as "Patrick Kane on defense" which I thought was pretty fittingHutson is a disaster in his own zone. He was like the 4th guy back there and then stood and watched while they buried the rebound
Just tuned in - it's tripping me out a bit to see a goalie named Huet with the old Reebok Premier graphic on his pads.
Switzerland were excellent yesterday... I doubt they could have played a softer game today if they tried. Soft on sticks, soft on bodies and no willingness to pay a price with shot blocks etc. Looks like they expected to get smoked and followed through.
Usually the only fans are Canadians (they host like almost every year too) so our team gets booed every game.Nazar almost killed a fan with that high shot.. . oh wait, there are no fans.
Their soft d-zone play could easily be exploited by Slovakia, and then in the knock-out stage. Switzerland and Norway just don't have enough offensive skill to do that with any consistency.Agree w whoever posted it earlier. Definitely the most “skilled” American team I’ve ever seen. They dont seem to care about back checking or defensive position but they’re always ready to attack you if you give up the puck.