Management - UPDATE: Steve Staios GM and POHO, Dave Poulin Senior VP of Hockey Operations | Page 79 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Management UPDATE: Steve Staios GM and POHO, Dave Poulin Senior VP of Hockey Operations

We he bad goaltending because there was no accountability to play defender and check. Green improved the goaltending by improving the checking, DJ had no accountability, he was managing a tire fire and didn’t have the support from management to stand up to his players like green does. This exact team with Talbot still makes the playoffs IMO adjust because every player has improved in every square inch of ice with Green and Staoisb
We had bad goaltending because Korpisalo, Sogaard and to a lesser degree Talbot, aren't good goalies. Our Dzone play just highlighted that weakness.

Pretending like Green could have fixed Korpisalo or Sogaard is madness.
 
I am not debating the goaltending but goalies will also look way better in the system the team is currently playing. The sens didnt and do not have the raw talent or the identity to win games the way DJ coached so if he was here even with better goaltending I dont see a scenario where they make it. Every goalies numbers got better when they left that wasnt a coincidence. Staios identified that this teams identity needed to be built around heavy hockey because the teams most unique and debatably best player and captain plays that way. I am sure the sens could have scored more goals this year but I dont think they are in a playoff spot. You will score more goals if you are allowed to make plays at the blue line all the time, but you're going to let in more than you score as well.

Staios isnt done here, he has a clear vision. I also think a team that learns to play this system a safer system more conducive to winning will have these habits more ingrained in them. As they do there will be less icings and more plays being made and the offense will improve while not giving up anything defensively.

I mean, we were 6 pts off with an .895 sv% and Hamonic in the top 4 in 2023. It's hard to argue we wouldn't have done better with the current roster over that one, is it enough to make up the 6 pt gap, idk, but I think acting like it's completely unrealistic defies logic imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bjornar Moxnes
I mean, we were 6 pts off with an .895 sv% and Hamonic in the top 4 in 2023. It's hard to argue we wouldn't have done better with the current roster over that one, is it enough to make up the 6 pt gap, idk, but I think acting like it's completely unrealistic defies logic imo.
Well I think I have made a very detailed argument and everything I know about hockey that I have learned in my lifetime. So no its not hard to argue. They couldnt play the way they used to and be successful unless you have a roster that is one of if not the most talented one on the ice most nights. The results speak for themselves. I think your stance defies the logic I have presented so we are at an impasse.
 
Well I think I have made a very detailed argument and everything I know about hockey that I have learned in my lifetime. So no its not hard to argue. They couldnt play the way they used to and be successful unless you have a roster that is one of if not the most talented one on the ice most nights. The results speak for themselves. I think your stance defies the logic I have presented so we are at an impasse.
The results are they got 6 pts from the playoffs without having a roster remotely close to being the most talented one on the ice most nights, and we've since made incremental improvements to that roster, pretty substantial ones on the blueline and in net in fact, so while I respect your opinion in general, on this, we'll have to agree to disagree.
 
The results are they got 6 pts from the playoffs without having a roster remotely close to being the most talented one on the ice most nights, and we've since made incremental improvements to that roster, pretty substantial ones on the blueline and in net in fact, so while I respect your opinion in general, on this, we'll have to agree to disagree.
So you basically have watched every game this year and dont think the style they play is better? Which draws me to the conclusion you think DJ is a better coach than Green.
 
So you basically have watched every game this year and dont think the style they play is better?
I think you are not comprehending what is being discussed if that's what you got from my posts.

I mean, I pretty much said the exact opposite in a previous reply to you, "I think Green's style is far more conducive to winning tight games that we'll see in the playoffs. The coaching change was the right decision."

What I am saying is that DJ along with his system, while flawed, could have potentially gotten this roster, with the general health we've had, to the playoffs too.

You can certainly disagree with that statement, just don't try and make up a strawman argument and claim that's my position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vandelay and bert
I think you are not comprehending what is being discussed if that's what you got from my posts.

I mean, I pretty much said the exact opposite in a previous reply to you, "I think Green's style is far more conducive to winning tight games that we'll see in the playoffs. The coaching change was the right decision."

What I am saying is that DJ along with his system, while flawed, could have potentially gotten this roster, with the general health we've had, to the playoffs too.

You can certainly disagree with that statement, just don't try and make up a strawman argument and claim that's my position.
The team is playing a completely different style and missed previously and made it now those are the results. Maybe DJ could have brought this roster to the playoffs but Staios didnt build this iteration to play the style DJ had instilled so no I dont think so. DJ wanted the team to play fast loose hockey they had more players that played that way before. I think it would have been a mitigated disaster for this roster to play the way DJ coached.

You got personal here when I continued a conversation in which you said my argument made no logistical sense. Now I come back with a response that was not personal just explaining my position and you are hitting me with 'strawman' and 'not comprehending' what you are saying. I get what you are trying to say I just dont agree. Staios had a plan to build a certain style team and did that by hiring a coach and specific roster pieces to play that way and now they have made the playoffs. When the previous regime flew by the seat of their pants. You think different and thats fine. I dont agree.
 
We had bad goaltending because Korpisalo, Sogaard and to a lesser degree Talbot, aren't good goalies. Our Dzone play just highlighted that weakness.

Pretending like Green could have fixed Korpisalo or Sogaard is madness.

No but I think if Green had same team with a healthy Talbot and Korpisalo he would of made the playoffs - how we keep the puck to the outside, the checking discipline, our blue line play - if Marilinen could of gotten us to the playoffs then Talbot could have too
 
The team is playing a completely different style and missed previously and made it now those are the results.
A different roster playing a different style and system got different results. There's no 1 to 1 comparison, the whole point is that you have to account for the differences too, not just say they missed under DJ therefore Green > DJ.

Maybe DJ could have brought this roster to the playoffs but Staios didnt build this iteration to play the style DJ had instilled so no I dont think so. DJ wanted the team to play fast loose hockey they had more players that played that way before. I think it would have been a mitigated disaster for this roster to play the way DJ coached.
A lot of the players are the same, but improved with experience.
Stutzle, Tkachuk, and Pinto have a couple more years under their belts
Batherson isn't recovering from a high ankle sprain
Sanderson is blossoming into a potential norris candidate instead of a rookie saddled with Hamonic.
Norris was available, instead of injured all but 8 games.

Meanwhile Jensen is a huge upgrade over Hamonic in the top 4, no matter what the system.
Amadio vs Joseph is a wash, I have zero doubt that Amadio would have been fine under DJ, he's a smart and versatile player.
Perron is not as good of a fit as DeBrincat from a style and system perspective, but he gives a crap and isn't waiting to get out so that's likely still an upgrade compared to the version of DBC we had.

The only area where I see a significant step back is Giroux, who has clearly regressed as he aged.

Then there's the goaltending. It's night and day.

You got personal here when I continued a conversation in which you said my argument made no logistical sense. Now I come back with a response that was not personal just explaining my position and you are hitting me with 'strawman' and 'not comprehending' what you are saying. I get what you are trying to say I just dont agree. Staios had a plan to build a certain style team and did that by hiring a coach and specific roster pieces to play that way and now they have made the playoffs. When the previous regime flew by the seat of their pants. You think different and thats fine. I dont agree.

I didn't say your argument made no logical sense, I said the conclusion that it's completely unrealistic to think DJ could have improved on the 2023 results with this years roster made no logical sense. Had you initially claimed it was uncertain whether they would improve enough to make the playoffs , that would be another matter, under no scenario could they have made the playoffs? That's what I challenged.

And you didn't just explain your position, you made claims about what mine was that were not based on anything I posted, so yeah, I called it out for what it was as a strawman.

I agree Staios has a plan and looked for roster pieces that fit into the style he wanted to play. I also agree that he's moving the team in the right direction going with that plan. Where I differ is that I see Staios as correctly identifying that what works in the regular season doesn't in the playoffs, so instead of building for reg season success, he targeted something that would be more sustainable when games got tighter in the playoffs.
 
We had bad goaltending because Korpisalo, Sogaard and to a lesser degree Talbot, aren't good goalies. Our Dzone play just highlighted that weakness.

Pretending like Green could have fixed Korpisalo or Sogaard is madness.
I think Green could've mitigated how bad Korpse was, but at best case, even if his .890 increases, its staying below .900, and without a legit 2nd pairing guy like Jensen helping solidfy our top 4, there's no fixing the make up of our D.

As good as we are playing defensively this year, our goalies are the biggest factors as to why our defense is better
 
A different roster playing a different style and system got different results. There's no 1 to 1 comparison, the whole point is that you have to account for the differences too, not just say they missed under DJ therefore Green > DJ.


A lot of the players are the same, but improved with experience.
Stutzle, Tkachuk, and Pinto have a couple more years under their belts
Batherson isn't recovering from a high ankle sprain
Sanderson is blossoming into a potential norris candidate instead of a rookie saddled with Hamonic.
Norris was available, instead of injured all but 8 games.

Meanwhile Jensen is a huge upgrade over Hamonic in the top 4, no matter what the system.
Amadio vs Joseph is a wash, I have zero doubt that Amadio would have been fine under DJ, he's a smart and versatile player.
Perron is not as good of a fit as DeBrincat from a style and system perspective, but he gives a crap and isn't waiting to get out so that's likely still an upgrade compared to the version of DBC we had.

The only area where I see a significant step back is Giroux, who has clearly regressed as he aged.

Then there's the goaltending. It's night and day.
I think you are ignoring huge parts of all of what has transpired. Different coachs help different players thrive and develop. Players like Stutzle, Tkachuk, Batherson are all way more responsible because of the new coach. Player development isnt just linear. How you are doing this is looking at it 1 for 1 and thats just not how it works.

Perron is a GREAT FIT for this teams new style. How do you not see that?... Debrincat would have been awful in this system.

Lastly Amadio and Joseph is a wash.... Seems to me with these evaluations of Perron and Amadio you really dont see what Staios was trying to do. He wanted consistent players that were good in danger zones, at hanging onto pucks. Getting them out controlled. Which actually explains this conversation. This was a culture change and identity switch that he has instilled with personnel, playing style. Basically everything.

I just dont think you are taking all the variables into the new coaching and differences in the new coaching and how that has impacted the results on the ice. Maybe you are just digging in but not looking at these variables seems like an excuse to try and prove your argument.

You say you dont think DJ is a better coach or on par with Green but you are arguing every point. Whats the point of that?
 
Last edited:
I thought the pouting about DJ getting fired was done. There were a lot of flaws and that needed to be fixed and Jacques and then Green and his staff as well as Staios with some personnel changes were all needed to fix them. Dorion did not help DJ with his roster decisions. DJ could not teach play without the puck, tight game hockey and his coaching strategy for success was unsustainable. The mindset of the players is completely different wrt playing winning hockey. Without looking back exactly it seems to me much of the success the team had under DJ was when they were long out of it and had zero pressure the numbers don't tell the whole story.. The attention to detail the players have now is night and day compared to DJ's teams. It was overdue time for him to go and he is gone.

Still pining for Joseph too smh lol
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bert and Loach
A point that's being missed in this is that with DJ behind the bench, the team would fold any time they had a chance to get back in the playoff race.

I remember one time they were looking like they'd get back in the race after a horrible December? November? and got absolutely BTFO in Chicago of all places.

Once they were eliminated from the playoffs for all intents and purposes, they'd go on a bit of a run to ruin the draft spot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64
I think you are ignoring huge parts of all of what has transpired. Different coachs help different players thrive and develop. Players like Stutzle, Tkachuk, Batherson are all way more responsible because of the new coach. Player development isnt just linear. How you are doing this is looking at it 1 for 1 and thats just not how it works.

Perron is a GREAT FIT for this teams new style. How do you not see that?... Debrincat would have been awful in this system.

Lastly Amadio and Joseph is a wash.... Seems to me with these evaluations of Perron and Amadio you really dont see what Staios was trying to do. He wanted consistent players that were good in danger zones, at hanging onto pucks. Getting them out controlled. Which actually explains this conversation. This was a culture change and identity switch that he has instilled with personnel, playing style. Basically everything.

I just dont think you are taking all the variables into the new coaching and differences in the new coaching and how that has impacted the results on the ice. Maybe you are just digging in but not looking at these variables seems like an excuse to try and prove your argument.

You say you dont think DJ is a better coach or on par with Green but you are arguing every point. Whats the point of that?

Perron is a great fit under Green. I agree. Never said anything to the contrary. What I said was he could play under DJ and still be relatively successful, and more specifically, imo help us more than DeBrincat did.

Debrincat would be awful here under Green, no disagreement, I never said a word to the contrary, not that it's in any way relevant. He was awful under DJ too since he had zero desire to be here, but that doesn't really matter since the whole discussion is about what DJ could/would have done with the current roster. Who cares how DBC fits in under Green.

I never said guys like Tkachuk, Batherson or Stu would be exactly the same players they are today, I do think they would have continued to develop and grow as players though. Green's defenive style should have long benefits for these guys, so I'm more than glad we made the coaching change, but again, not really the point I was discussing, since the topic was could DJ get have gotten guys into the playoffs.

Wrt Batherson, what I specifically identified was his health as the major reason for a likely superior performance we could expect in the alternate reality where DJ was coaching this roster. That doesn't mean I expect him to have the same improvement on the defensive side, just that I recognize the impact his ankle had in 2023. Batherson broke out the year before under DJ, putting up 44 pts in 46 games, with a +4 rating before getting hurt by Dell. We know what he could do under DJ when healthy.

Amadio and Joseph, again, it's not about their fit under Green that I'm speaking to, it's about their fit under DJ. I agree Joseph wouldn't likely work as well as Amadio under Green's system, I really like how Amadio has fit in and he's a big part of our current shut down line, but that's not really relevant. What I'm talking about is how Amadio would fit into DJ's system, and I think he's a smart enough player that he would make it work.

Same goes with Perron, he's a very intelligent player, so him adapting to DJ's system isn't something I'm worried about, he did fine in a more offensive minded Det system, he isn't uniquely only capable under Green. On the other hand, I'm less confident Joseph would have been able to adapt to Green, since he relies on his physical attributes (speed) and less on his brain and almost positive DBC wouldn't have done well playing Green's system since he's extremely one dimensional,

I think I made my position clear, the reg season and the post season are different beasts, I think Green is far better suited to the later, while DJ's style can work when things are a bit looser but struggles down the stretch and into the playoffs.

I also think that since Green had to implement a new system, there were growing pains that wouldn't be there to the same extent had DJ continued and coached this roster. I think we would have a better record right now if Green was hired last year and this was year two, We basically had 21 guys including all our core players adapting to a new system instead of 5 or 6 guys. That makes a big difference in how quickly the team gels. This of course assumes that DJ didn't/hadn't lost the room as a result of last year's performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert
So why didn't Staois keep DJ then? If all DJ needed, a goalie and a few players that fit a specific roll, to get the same results as Greene.
 
Come on guys, he specifically said the two coaches would get different results come playoff time. I agree. DJ might have got us to the post season, but he would have done it on skill and not structure, and that doesn't work in the playoffs.
 
We had bad goaltending because Korpisalo, Sogaard and to a lesser degree Talbot, aren't good goalies. Our Dzone play just highlighted that weakness.

Pretending like Green could have fixed Korpisalo or Sogaard is madness.

that defense would have broken any goalie including ullmark
 
So why didn't Staois keep DJ then? If all DJ needed, a goalie and a few players that fit a specific roll, to get the same results as Greene.
I mean, I think I was pretty clear in why I think we changed and why I think it's the right decision, though it may have been lost in why I think DJ might also have been able to get this roster into the playoffs with the same relative health we've had.

DJ's style was probably good enough to get this roster to the playoffs, but I think it falls apart in the playoffs when the competition is better, and the games are tighter.

I also think Green's style is more resilient when injuries happen, so it's more sustainable. You aren't always going to be as healthy as we were this season, in fact, this is the healthiest we've been in years.

We chose some short term pain (the team adapting to a new system and enduring the ups and downs that go along with that) for long term gains (a higher potential in both the reg season and playoffs that is more resilient to injuries). This year, we've worked out the kinks, so moving forward, the hope is that we'll hit the ground running instead of needing to ramp up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert
that defense would have broken any goalie including ullmark
We were not uniquely bad defensively, the underlying numbers back that up.

I'd argue our goaltending would have broken any roster's confidence and I think that's probably a stronger argument than what you're suggesting.


Just to expand on that, Forberg's numbers with Ottawa

2022: .917, 0.198 goals saved above expected/60. league average was .907 sv%
2023: .902, 0.330 gsax/60. league average was .904
2024: .890, -.279 gsax/60. (coming off double MCL injury), league average was .903
2025: .912, 0.193 gsax/60. league average is .900

Is he better under Green, maybe? gsax is actually worse two out of three years. Was he awful and broken under Smith, outside of a year coming off that double MCL injury, doesn't look like it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy
Staios reminds me of me in fantasy leagues: he makes trades where he's ok with giving up value, as long as the return still improves his team. 2 years of Jensen for 1 year of Chychrun is in that mold. Maybe he could have tried to extract more value, but ultimately it's still better that he made the trade rather than staying pat.
 
Come on guys, he specifically said the two coaches would get different results come playoff time. I agree. DJ might have got us to the post season, but he would have done it on skill and not structure, and that doesn't work in the playoffs.
TBF, making the playoffs is almost entirely based off of structure. Look at Carolina. They severely under produce their expected goals for, and they always make the playoffs even if suffering massive injuries. They don't even have good goaltending. Buffalo severely overproduces their expected goals for and have one of the best Dman in the league, Reimer playing like a Vezina winner, and look where they are.

In the playoffs, though, you need individual skill to surpass opponents since almost every team will have at bare minimum a good if not excellent structural system. That's why Carolina always falls short.

Outside of the 2019 Blues, every cup winner had at least 1 if not multiple elite players, along with great goaltending (Outside of the 2022 Avs).

2018: Ovechkin
2020: Kucherov, Vasi, Point
2021: Same as 2020.
2022: MacKinnon and Makar
2023: Eichel and Stone
2024: Tkachuk and Barkov

Now runner ups may fall flat in the star department, but even though, most runner ups still have star players.

2020: Heiskanen
2021: Price?
2022: Kucherov, Vasi, Point
2023: Tkachuk and Barkov
2024: McDavid and Draisaitl
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy
Korpisalo is putting up essentially the same save % in Boston this year. He has done similarly his whole career. Coaches weren't "fixing" anything with him and he'd be right here giving that same type of performance. He was just a backup that had an outlier that led to a massive contract. Another cautionary tale.
 
I thought the pouting about DJ getting fired was done. There were a lot of flaws and that needed to be fixed and Jacques and then Green and his staff as well as Staios with some personnel changes were all needed to fix them. Dorion did not help DJ with his roster decisions. DJ could not teach play without the puck, tight game hockey and his coaching strategy for success was unsustainable. The mindset of the players is completely different wrt playing winning hockey. Without looking back exactly it seems to me much of the success the team had under DJ was when they were long out of it and had zero pressure the numbers don't tell the whole story.. The attention to detail the players have now is night and day compared to DJ's teams. It was overdue time for him to go and he is gone.

Still pining for Joseph too smh lol
Nobody is pouting about DJ getting fired, I'm just pushing back on the claim that he'd be bottom 10 with this roster when he finished with 86pts with a much worse roster.

Pining for Joseph? where did you read that? Do you think me saying Amadio could fit in under DJs system as well as Joseph is pining for him?
 
I mean, I think I was pretty clear in why I think we changed and why I think it's the right decision, though it may have been lost in why I think DJ might also have been able to get this roster into the playoffs with the same relative health we've had.

DJ's style was probably good enough to get this roster to the playoffs, but I think it falls apart in the playoffs when the competition is better, and the games are tighter.

I also think Green's style is more resilient when injuries happen, so it's more sustainable. You aren't always going to be as healthy as we were this season, in fact, this is the healthiest we've been in years.

We chose some short term pain (the team adapting to a new system and enduring the ups and downs that go along with that) for long term gains (a higher potential in both the reg season and playoffs that is more resilient to injuries). This year, we've worked out the kinks, so moving forward, the hope is that we'll hit the ground running instead of needing to ramp up.
DJ wouldn't have used this roster right and the younger players wouldn't have learned to play a better kind of hockey under him. The new additions would have flamed out. I know you like to keep the conversation going, but DJ wouldn't have got the same results.
 
TBF, making the playoffs is almost entirely based off of structure. Look at Carolina. They severely under produce their expected goals for, and they always make the playoffs even if suffering massive injuries. They don't even have good goaltending. Buffalo severely overproduces their expected goals for and have one of the best Dman in the league, Reimer playing like a Vezina winner, and look where they are.

In the playoffs, though, you need individual skill to surpass opponents since almost every team will have at bare minimum a good if not excellent structural system. That's why Carolina always falls short.

Outside of the 2019 Blues, every cup winner had at least 1 if not multiple elite players, along with great goaltending (Outside of the 2022 Avs).

2018: Ovechkin
2020: Kucherov, Vasi, Point
2021: Same as 2020.
2022: MacKinnon and Makar
2023: Eichel and Stone
2024: Tkachuk and Barkov

Now runner ups may fall flat in the star department, but even though, most runner ups still have star players.

2020: Heiskanen
2021: Price?
2022: Kucherov, Vasi, Point
2023: Tkachuk and Barkov
2024: McDavid and Draisaitl
Buffalo is where they are because of special teams, they have the 7th worst combined special teams in the league. They have the 13th best GF% in the league 5v5. Fix the PP and PK and they'd likely make the playoffs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad