BondraTime
Registered User
He’s listed for the Rookie tournament as well, released todayWasn't Donovan at the dev camp?
He’s listed for the Rookie tournament as well, released todayWasn't Donovan at the dev camp?
At least as far as I'm concerned that is not what I'm talking about. Oroboros talked about how in another organization the GM replaced all his scouting within 2 weeks of taking over. Changing the scouts doesn't affect the players on the ice. Why didn't the new regime make wholesale changes to our scouting? It's been a year now already.
For the record I didn't mind rolling with DJ Smith till at least the end of the season. But I also saw that bringing in Jacques did seem to have a beneficial effect no matter how much players may have been unsettled by the change.
Yes, both father & son.Wasn't Donovan at the dev camp?
I think he was talking about the father, but both Shean & Jorian (father & son) were at devlopment camp.He’s listed for the Rookie tournament as well, released today
Yes, I was refering to Shean, he was listed on the rookie camp lst as a Skills CoachYes, both father & son.
I think he was talking about the father, but both Shean & Jorian (father & son) were at devlopment camp.
It doesn't take a year to identify that our scouting staff is 20-30 years behind the times as far as how they evaluate prospects and what they value in draft eligibles. It's quite concerning there's been zero movement on the amateur side and it's starting to make me think Staios isn't opposed to continuing to focus primarily on tools and toughness on draft day, passing up skill and IQ to do so.
There seem to be two possibilities, one Staois is fine with the Scouting department. He has had plenty of time to implement what exactly he wanted from the scouting staff in terms of the kind of player he wanted given the draft & ranking of avalable prospects & he seemed fine with the pick since he was the one who walked up to the mike & announced it. The second possibility was to let the scouting department do their job & let them argue who they think they should pick with their first pick & go with their recommendation. There is rarely overall consensus with most scouting departments & that is healthy to have different opinions & allow them to argue on behalf of who they want & make the best arguement for a particular player.Most of the arguments either fall flat or regress into outright strawmanning.
As you have mentioned, there wouldn't have been an impact on the players had Staios actually hired a new head of scouting instead of letting 72 year old Don Boyd take over as a caretaker. Doubt they would have even noticed or cared.
You don't need a year to find a new head scout. There are many many long-time scouts around the league that would love a promotion and get to run their own scouting staff. It wouldn't be hard to convince one to leave for a promotion. We did that offering Ryan Bowness the assistant GM job when he was running the Pens pro-scouting.
It doesn't take a year to identify that our scouting staff is 20-30 years behind the times as far as how they evaluate prospects and what they value in draft eligibles. It's quite concerning there's been zero movement on the amateur side and it's starting to make me think Staios isn't opposed to continuing to focus primarily on tools and toughness on draft day, passing up skill and IQ to do so.
Most of the arguments either fall flat or regress into outright strawmanning.
As you have mentioned, there wouldn't have been an impact on the players had Staios actually hired a new head of scouting instead of letting 72 year old Don Boyd take over as a caretaker. Doubt they would have even noticed or cared.
You don't need a year to find a new head scout. There are many many long-time scouts around the league that would love a promotion and get to run their own scouting staff. It wouldn't be hard to convince one to leave for a promotion. We did that offering Ryan Bowness the assistant GM job when he was running the Pens pro-scouting.
It doesn't take a year to identify that our scouting staff is 20-30 years behind the times as far as how they evaluate prospects and what they value in draft eligibles. It's quite concerning there's been zero movement on the amateur side and it's starting to make me think Staios isn't opposed to continuing to focus primarily on tools and toughness on draft day, passing up skill and IQ to do so.
However, in fairness, that old scouting draft was following the direction of the Dorion; now they are following the direction of Staios. That "direction" means the type of skills that the GM desires most highly over other skills.Staios has access to resources we don't, and if he couldn't identify that our scouting is too narrow-minded, that doesn't inspire the most confidence.
To be fair there was nowhere to go but up.The credibility chart is taking some significant upticks since the ownership/management change.
The vision of what it takes to win and the makeup of the team has taken a big shift upwards. Now we just have to translate it to wins, staying in the hunt and playing some real meaningful games.
Marshall Johnson says hello.Best GM Ottawa has ever had. GM. Of the year easily.
Love me some Steve Staois. Incredible what 1 man can do to change a team.
Unlike Dorion he addressed areas of need rather than getting the shiny new toy.People need to calm down on the Staios love.
So far he's only made a bunch of moves.
We have no idea if the team got better.
And doesn’t sound like a complete moron when discussing it. It’s night and day.Unlike Dorion he addressed areas of need rather than getting the shiny new toy.
Calm down. LolUnlike Dorion he addressed areas of need rather than getting the shiny new toy.
There's a lot of GMs who suck at their jobs but don't sound like morons when talking to the media...what does that matter?And doesn’t sound like a complete moron when discussing it. It’s night and day.
I say the same thing about Dorion.Best GM Ottawa has ever had. GM. Of the year easily.
Love me some Steve Staois. Incredible what 1 man can do to change a team.
Yep, many changes have been made in management, GM, coaches, and players. We’ve addressed our biggest weakness in the roster with Ullmark.The credibility chart is taking some significant upticks since the ownership/management change.
The vision of what it takes to win and the makeup of the team has taken a big shift upwards. Now we just have to translate it to wins, staying in the hunt and playing some real meaningful games.
Well would you rather suck at your job quietly or suck at your job and sound like a complete moron as well?There's a lot of GMs who suck at their jobs but don't sound like morons when talking to the media...what does that matter?
And we were lucky to be stuck with the one GM that could do both.There's a lot of GMs who suck at their jobs but don't sound like morons when talking to the media...what does that matter?