Upcoming Spencer Knight decision

Florida should do ____________ with their 2025-2026 goaltending

  • Buy-out Knight, sign a journeyman to backup Bob, use extra money on UFAs

    Votes: 5 21.7%
  • Attempt to trade Bob and roll with Knight as starter

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Keep the Bob-Knight tandem

    Votes: 15 65.2%
  • Other-specify in thread

    Votes: 3 13.0%

  • Total voters
    23

barkovcanfinnish

Stanley Cup Champs 2024
Sep 22, 2014
5,323
4,163
Chicago, IL
I’m telling ya, Buffalo is about to do something drastic.

If you’re going to move on from Knight this season, they have to be at the top of the list to try to get a good deal in.

But like others have said, if the deal isn’t worth it then you might as well hold onto him, at least until next offseason.

I will say this, if Knight goes, so goes our future plans in net. You have to address that in the next draft, as well as our defensive pipeline. And we don’t have a lot of picks.
 

Dread Clawz

LAWSonic Boom
Nov 25, 2006
28,145
10,178
Pennsylvania
I’m telling ya, Buffalo is about to do something drastic.

If you’re going to move on from Knight this season, they have to be at the top of the list to try to get a good deal in.

But like others have said, if the deal isn’t worth it then you might as well hold onto him, at least until next offseason.

I will say this, if Knight goes, so goes our future plans in net. You have to address that in the next draft, as well as our defensive pipeline. And we don’t have a lot of picks.

Lukkonnen has played well for them, I doubt they want Knight .
 

Panthers Propaganda

We're a team
Oct 28, 2015
4,852
4,672
Canada
>23 year old goalie
>36 year old guy aging in net
>Very few other viable options on the market.
>Other goalies in the pipeline/rights to playing in the VHL or MHL or sucking ass at the NCAA level.

I am in the camp of giving up on the guy comes back to bite us in the ass. Then *WE* end up being the ones with an Oilers problem of a total turd in net.

Only way I consider moving him is if another promising young RD comes back this way.

Edit: One thing that sucks is with his mental health issues he did essentially miss a year of development time.
 
Last edited:

Laus723

Graceful brutality
Sponsor
Jan 27, 2006
32,244
7,229
Wellington, FL
Keep the Bob-Knight tandem, as Knight's value isn't gonna get you what you want. Bob will need a successor soon, see how Knight does next season, he will still be a RFA , so if you want to trade him you can still trade him then and then the acquiring team still has a young goalie under control, and he might increase his value by then so that might be an asset with some reasonable value then. Buying out and throwing away a 1st round pick is dumb, when we don't have many assets anyway.
This is the only answer. Anything else is nonsensical emotions not understanding that the guys have played deep two seasons in a row and they turned it on late both times. The D has weak points as well. I trust Zito, but I don’t see him moving a guy who’s been in our system and who he sees value enough in to give him that contract.
 

KW

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 21, 2006
13,627
12,380
>23 year old goalie
>36 year old guy aging in net
>Very few other viable options on the market.
>Other goalies in the pipeline/rights to playing in the VHL or MHL or sucking ass at the NCAA level.

I am in the camp of giving up on the guy comes back to bite us in the ass. Then *WE* end up being the ones with an Oilers problem of a total turd in net.

Only way I consider moving him is if another promising young RD comes back this way.

Edit: One thing that sucks is with his mental health issues he did essentially miss a year of development time.
We’re not gonna end up like the Oilers because we’re not spending $50M on 4 guys like they will (McD, Drai, Bouch, Nurse). They’re have no money for a G. We’re balanced and can find an Oettinger or Saros equivalent.
 

Last Rat Standing

Registered User
May 26, 2016
419
573
South Florida
>23 year old goalie
>36 year old guy aging in net
>Very few other viable options on the market.
>Other goalies in the pipeline/rights to playing in the VHL or MHL or sucking ass at the NCAA level.

I am in the camp of giving up on the guy comes back to bite us in the ass. Then *WE* end up being the ones with an Oilers problem of a total turd in net.

Only way I consider moving him is if another promising young RD comes back this way.

Edit: One thing that sucks is with his mental health issues he did essentially miss a year of development time.

I agree. I'm not ready to give up on him. Watch him go to another team and he becomes a stud and it ends up being like the 2017 expansion draft
 

ucanthanzalthetruth

#CatsAreChamps
Jul 13, 2013
28,751
34,754
Mildly surprised with the poll results. I think people are discounting:

A. How much 3.75 million could help this off-season
B. Ok you trust Zito and want to run it back. But what if he sucks again in2025-2026? He obviously won't be qualified at 4.5 million and then he can sign elsewhere anyways. No one would trade for the signing rights of a sub .900Sv% goalie making 4.5 million lol.
 

Gentle Man

09/12
Nov 15, 2011
43,667
42,127
Ontario, CA
The current Rags remind me of when we traded Gudbranson and the team went on a free fall. Down to the shitter defenseman player and big booming hits and handedness.

it's time to trade knight and Bob for Igor.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad