Unpopular opinions | Page 24 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Unpopular opinions

hellebuyck obvs

seriously though, ehlers had a few good moments but kyle connor was a straight up stud tonight. best player on the ice after binnington.
You mean apart from losing his man on the 1st Blues goal and the horrendous giveaway that led to the second?
 
  • Like
Reactions: decma
When Mike Richter was on fire (like 1994 Playoffs, World Cup 1996 final against Canada), he was on Hasek's level, he just didn't have the career consistency...
Mike Richter is a major catalyst for the Rangers dark ages from 1998 to 2004. That shot he flubbed on vs Pittsburgh caused a chain reaction that won a cup later on destroyed evreything else.
 
Mike Richter is a major catalyst for the Rangers dark ages from 1998 to 2004. That shot he flubbed on vs Pittsburgh caused a chain reaction that won a cup later on destroyed evreything else.

Years of trading good young players for aging vets for 6 years had finally caught up to the rangers in 98.

Then they tried to buy their way out of the basement instead of developing youth.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mrhockey193195
I'd be interested to hear more about this if you're so willing...

Lindstrom was a better defender, but Zubov was a better offensive player with better vision and better puck handling ability. Unfortunately the Dallas market doesn't have the same mystique of Detroit "Hockey Town" and that's why Lindstrom today is a bigger legend.

And for most of his career, Lindstrom was surrounded by much better talent...
 
Last edited:
Lidstrom vs Zubov is a original debate.

1998 to 2006 for an era were both in "charge", Zubov became the Stars number 1 guy on the PP that year, Coffey was long gone, etc...

Lidstrom Wings is the best powerplay of the league with a good clear little gap over everyone, Stars are fifth closer to #10 than the Wings are to the second place Avalanche.

Lidstrom RedWings are by far the best offense in the league, with Lidstrom scoring points at a 17% higher pace than Zubov.

How much Lidstrom scored more because he was on a more stacked powerplay vs he helped make is power play better, how much of an offensive gap was there really (if we include getting the puck cleanly out of your own zone as the start of the offense) ? And if there is one, does it make up for one of the lowest error rate defensive player in league history ?
 
Last edited:
Even as a Lidstrom guy I think I'd agree Zubov was better offensively, at least in a vacuum (Lidstrom perhaps better at using his teammates, but Zubov was better at skating and handling the puck and smart enough to leverage these talents). Considering the era, in Dallas' system, on that mushy ice, Zubov's numbers don't do him justice. He was fantastic.


However, Nick was a defense first player who happened to also excel offensively, so this kind of comparison doesn't remotely capture his real impact.
 
I'd be interested to hear more about this if you're so willing...
There was an analytics guy that made the argument for Zubov winning the Norris for the 05-06 season over Nik but still it would only be for one season.

Sam Gagner for one game was better than anyone in the league but how must stock are we going to put in one game, some stretch one season ect....?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Years of reading good young players for aging vets for 6 years had finally caught up to the rangers in 98.

Then they tried to buy their way out of the basement instead of developing youth.

Rangers convinced us that manny malholtra, pavel brendl, al montoya, hugh jessiman all were gonna be stars and save the franchise. =/
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadLuke
There is no doubt, WAY MORE levels to generational stats and........another generational player that has a higher offensive ceiling than all of Gretzky/Orr/Howe/Lemieux combined, something like a 600pt level player out there that was probably never discovered.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad