Neutrinos
Registered User
- Sep 23, 2016
- 8,621
- 3,614
The main event looked more like an exhibition than a fight
Probably really optimistic, but Dana said Whittaker would be out 4 weeks. I bet we see him back in April or May.
I'm no professional athlete and everyone reacts differently, but I had this exact surgery recently and I am 100% comfortable saying there is zero chance he fights in April. I would be pretty surprised if he fights in May.
June is the earliest I could see it, but I would guess like August.
Just for an update on Whittaker, here's the timeline for a return:
Whittaker discharged after bowel, hernia surgery
Dana White out to lunch on this one, no surprise. Whittaker's manager gives the correct June-August timeline.
Hoping they sneak in that Gastelum/Adesanya fight for at least an interim belt in the meantime.
I think Gastelum/Adesanya for an interim belt makes sense in this case, maybe on that April PPV.
I think Gastelum/Adesanya for an interim belt makes sense in this case, maybe on that April PPV.
I'm not a big fan of interim belts either, but this one makes sense. Especially since Dana said Stylebender-Anderson was for the #1 contender spot. Both Stylebender and Gastelum are going to feel like they deserve a title shot, so they are probably going to sit out until Whittaker is back unless they make the interim belt. I think both would be game.Yeah, agreed. I can't get behind interim belts too often but I think this time it makes sense.
I'd be good with that, too, but with the way Dana stuck up for him already, I doubt he'd then turn around and strip him....and I don't expect the UFC to ever give up the power of just being able to decide on a case by case basis. It would probably take a fighter's union to give that up.I would also be fine with just stripping Whittaker since he cannot defend his belt within 12 months and then start that as the new rule going forward, thus eliminating interim belts.