I'd go with Václav Eismann (current U17 coach) for next season. He knows the 2006 players very well and they played some great hockey under him in the tournaments I watched. Next U18 the team should be much better in terms of offense.. several talented forwards in that class.We did finish 2nd in a pool with Canada and US last year and we did beat Canada last year here. We also won our quarter 8-0. Then we shit the bed.lol We will be shitting it much earlier this year.
Time for a change but I hope it isn't a former NHLer and his first job! I don't want to see Jagr coaching next year. I would like to see a coach. Do we have any?
After this shitshow i am going to temper my expectation only guys worth anything are Sale who was excellent Jiricek who had struggles as 16yo and Hrabal, then there is decent Dvorak and then nothing absolute black hole consisted of guys who are going to have problems playing in Chance league if they will be playing hockey at all, they are fcking brutal...I'd go with Václav Eismann (current U17 coach) for next season. He knows the 2006 players very well and they played some great hockey under him in the tournaments I watched. Next U18 the team should be much better in terms of offense.. several talented forwards in that class.
And that's enough for you to not mind the coach? Boar summed it up, the guy is a completely incompetent coach. Always, always his team finds a way to lose the game, there always comes a point sooner or later when he breaks. And such random shots like last year when they beat a very weakened Canada, they played good power plays because he had the right players for them.. Just no, the guy is not giving his teams anything, there is no movement in sight, there is no clear tactic in the game. Nothing even remotely close to what 2x Rulík accomplished with his team.
I was excited about this team but I also had badinka, galvas and benak on it.I'd go with Václav Eismann (current U17 coach) for next season. He knows the 2006 players very well and they played some great hockey under him in the tournaments I watched. Next U18 the team should be much better in terms of offense.. several talented forwards in that class.
None of those players would help that team. As I didn't believe that Rulík could compete with other teams (on paper they should have been better) and he did miracles, this coach knows shit and never moved the team anywhere. He sunk the maximum.I was excited about this team but I also had badinka, galvas and benak on it.
Eismann sounds like a great choice.
I'm pretty sure Celebrini could put up 4 points against Norway as well right?So after 4 games Celebrini 7 points and Kiviharju 7 as defender.
yet Celebrini seen as clear first overall and Kiviharju bust,flop,overrated,overhyped future 2nd rounder... i dont understand
Best game of the day... Based on draft rankings, Finn's are a little weaker this year. Slovakia has looked good. Should be a close game! Good luckOkay, so we get the Finns in the QF. Should be a fun game.
Yes lots of talk about "issues" in Kiviharjus game but quiet on how Celebrini cant score at U18I'm pretty sure Celebrini could put up 4 points against Norway as well right?
But at the 24 draft scouts and people are all going to be talking about each guy having 7 points before the knockout stage in the 2023 U18 no doubt.
Celebrini is tracking as the higher pick in the 24 draft, in fact he is in the running for #1 so enjoy the 4 point night against Norway as it doesn't mean much in the big scheme of things.Yes lots of talk about "issues" in Kiviharjus game but quiet on how Celebrini cant score at U18
Going to be weak first overall pick then if can't even perform at U18.Celebrini is tracking as the higher pick in the 24 draft, in fact he is in the running for #1 so enjoy the 4 point night against Norway as it doesn't mean much in the big scheme of thinGoi
Celebrini isn't having a great tournament but neither is Kiviharju and all underagers will have lesser totals than guys in their last year.Going to be weak first overall pick then if can't even perform at U18.
This has aged well IMOWe will be bringing all our offence today! By that I mean Sale passing to guys that can't shoot.
We will leave here with losses to Slovakia, Canada, Sweden and US. Very little argument we were a medal contender. Our crowning contribution will be being tied with Sweden after 50 minutes before losing lolSo it went just as pretty much everyone had predicted for the Czechs. We knew we had a poor team and a poor coach (sorry, Czechboy..!) and even before the first puck was played literally the only question for me that had no 100% obvious answer was if we beat Slovakia and avoid the US in the QF or not. We didn’t, so we won’t. Shame.. though with this team we would not get far anyway.
Cole Hutson 7 points as wellSo after 4 games Celebrini 7 points and Kiviharju 7 as defender.
yet Celebrini seen as clear first overall and Kiviharju bust,flop,overrated,overhyped future 2nd rounder... i dont understand
Uh, how is Kiviharju not having a great tournament? He's tying the all-time points record for u17 defensemen along with Cole Hutson. Leading the team in plus/minus and all, 5 points ahead of the second-highest scoring defenseman on the team, etc.Celebrini isn't having a great tournament but neither is Kiviharju and all underagers will have lesser totals than guys in their last year.
After the 3 dots you summed up your answer... you clearly don't understand lolSo after 4 games Celebrini 7 points and Kiviharju 7 as defender.
yet Celebrini seen as clear first overall and Kiviharju bust,flop,overrated,overhyped future 2nd rounder... i dont understand
Yeah, this. I don't know what games folks have been watching if they think Celebrini isn't having a good tournament. His play away from the puck has stood out more to me, but if we're sticking with points, Celebrini's 1.75 points per game (7 total) is equal to or better than the D-1 U-18 of Bedard (1.75), Stamkos (1.67), Hall (1.29) Lafreniere (1.20), Duchene (1.14), etc.I am not sure if people are actually watching the games, Celebrini has been playing very well, one of our best if not best forward. He's in the tougher group to boot, the other group has more teams to beat up on and look terrific.
You're way off on these takes concerning his game so far folks. Absolutely nothing in his play thus far suggests he shouldn't be on the short list for contenders for first overall next year.
I'll second the play away from the puck part here, I really wasn't expecting that from a young player like him and it's been as impressive as what he is able to create offensively. Good work on the back check all the time stripping guys of the puck, anticipating where the puck is going to be going and jumping on it to break up potential plays, it's been impressive.Yeah, this. I don't know what games folks have been watching if they think Celebrini isn't having a good tournament. His play away from the puck has stood out more to me, but if we're sticking with points, Celebrini's 1.75 points per game (7 total) is equal to or better than the D-1 U-18 of Bedard (1.75), Stamkos (1.67), Hall (1.29) Lafreniere (1.20), Duchene (1.14), etc.
I certainly wasn't expecting Bedard (D-2) or McDavid numbers from Celebrini, but those guys are two of the best players we'll ever see at the junior level.
If we go back to last season, Bedard had 7 points, Fantilli had 6 and Leo Carlsson had 3 (in 2 games), and these guys are pretty much the consensus top 3 this year. Celebrini putting up 1.75 ppg certainly doesn't mean he isn't a #1 caliber prospect or the draft is somehow going to be weak. There's far more to it than that.
He had 4 assists in the final mean nothing 10-2 win over Norway and he was +5 in the game.Uh, how is Kiviharju not having a great tournament? He's tying the all-time points record for u17 defensemen along with Cole Hutson. Leading the team in plus/minus and all, 5 points ahead of the second-highest scoring defenseman on the team, etc.
To me it's crazy just how high the expectations are for him, while certain other prospects get everything spun in their favor.