Tyson Barrie

xbestboybandever

Registered User
Jun 24, 2015
1,227
433
I never said he wasn’t...

"I’m not saying he’s done developing, but his game isn’t as conducive to offensive production as Makar and Barries is. "

It seems to me as though his offensive production is just different. You say he isn't a play driver, but exiting the zone and being able to make stretch passes seems to be driving the play.
 

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,108
26,295
"I’m not saying he’s done developing, but his game isn’t as conducive to offensive production as Makar and Barries is. "

It seems to me as though his offensive production is just different. You say he isn't a play driver, but exiting the zone and being able to make stretch passes seems to be driving the play.

I mean there’s more to driving offense than transitioning from offense to defense. And again I said his play style is less conducive to offensive production(or points if you rather) than Barrie or Makar. That doesn’t mean he can’t produce it’s just that Makar and Barrie both play in a way that will provide more points than Girard.
 

Foxtail

Registered User
Mar 31, 2018
2,182
585
Nova Scotia
This in particular means absolutely nothing whatsoever. Duncan Keith didn't make the NHL at 19, pretty sure Erik Karlsson didn't either. Cale Makar didn't either. Completely irrelevant where a player starts as opposed to when he hits his prime.

This is as far as I want to venture into what will be this summer's dumbest argument by a country mile.
Erik Karlsson did and Girard put up similar numbers to him.

My point is that saying pigeonholing Girard this early in his career is silly considering at the same age Barrie wasn't looking like he was for certain even going to be an NHL player
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gatorbait19

xbestboybandever

Registered User
Jun 24, 2015
1,227
433
I mean there’s more to driving offense than transitioning from offense to defense. And again I said his play style is less conducive to offensive production(or points if you rather) than Barrie or Makar. That doesn’t mean he can’t produce it’s just that Makar and Barrie both play in a way that will provide more points than Girard.

I just don't agree with any of this.

Half the argument that people make with Barrie is his ability to transition from the d-zone to o-zone using his speed and you are telling me that is more valuable offensively than being able to make creative and effective passes to team mates to spring them? I don't expect Girard to eclipse the 50 point mark next season, but to say that he isn't capable of it is totally off-base.

And the stockiness thing is ridiculous. Barrie is 27 and has physically matured where as Girard is the same height but is ~7 years younger and 28 pounds lighter. Girard will get there, he just needs to do that thing that most kids do... Grow.
 

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,108
26,295
I just don't agree with any of this.

Half the argument that people make with Barrie is his ability to transition from the d-zone to o-zone using his speed and you are telling me that is more valuable offensively than being able to make creative and effective passes to team mates to spring them? I don't expect Girard to eclipse the 50 point mark next season, but to say that he isn't capable of it is totally off-base.

And the stockiness thing is ridiculous. Barrie is 27 and has physically matured where as Girard is the same height but is ~7 years younger and 28 pounds lighter. Girard will get there, he just needs to do that thing that most kids do... Grow.

Yes, Barrie is good at transition and obviously a big strength of his, but Girard is better at it. Barrie is better at joining the rush and creating odd man rush situations. They have some strengths that are similar but Barrie is better in the O-zone than Girard and Girard is better in the D-Zone than Barrie. They’re both both really good puck movers but play a different role and style of hockey. It’s not that complicated.
 

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,108
26,295
It's insulting to Makar and Girard to say they wont be as good

It’s not ridiculous to think that Barrie will be better than Makar next year. Makar will almost certainly end up the better player between him and Barrie I don’t think anyone has said otherwise.

On the Girard part they play completely different roles and styles so I don’t know who will end up the better player. Girard will always be the more well rounded player, but offensively I think Barrie will be better and that’s not that far fetched.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS

xbestboybandever

Registered User
Jun 24, 2015
1,227
433
Yes, Barrie is good at transition and obviously a big strength of his, but Girard is better at it. Barrie is better at joining the rush and creating odd man rush situations. They have some strengths that are similar but Barrie is better in the O-zone than Girard and Girard is better in the D-Zone than Barrie. They’re both both really good puck movers but play a different role and style of hockey. It’s not that complicated.

And yet I am asking how it is that Girard's game isn't as conducive as Barrie's offensively. Because Barrie is more aggressive when it comes to joining the rush, yet Girard's passes and transition game that start those odd man rushes aren't as effective? I am not knocking either player, I just think that you stating that Girard can't reach Barrie's offensive production is ludicrous, especially at this point of their careers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMack29

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,108
26,295
And yet I am asking how it is that Girard's game isn't as conducive as Barrie's offensively. Because Barrie is more aggressive when it comes to joining the rush, yet Girard's passes and transition game that start those odd man rushes aren't as effective? I am not knocking either player, I just think that you stating that Girard can't reach Barrie's offensive production is ludicrous, especially at this point of their careers.

That goes back to the first part of what I said which is the difference between their shots. If Girard can get it to Barries level than that will go a long way to him becoming a 50 pt guy. That’s the biggest difference to me. I mean I just don’t think he can be a 50 pt guy scoring 4-5 times a year. I just think it’s unlikely he’s a 40-50 pt guy. Like I said I see him as a Spurgeon type defenseman, and that’s not a bad thing at all. He’s just a different type of dman than Makar and Barrie.

Done with this thread. Peace out all.
 

xbestboybandever

Registered User
Jun 24, 2015
1,227
433
That goes back to the first part of what I said which is the difference between their shots. If Girard can get it to Barries level than that will go a long way to him becoming a 50 pt guy. That’s the biggest difference to me. I mean I just don’t think he can be a 50 pt guy scoring 4-5 times a year. I just think it’s unlikely he’s a 40-50 pt guy. Like I said I see him as a Spurgeon type defenseman, and that’s not a bad thing at all. He’s just a different type of dman than Makar and Barrie.

Done with this thread. Peace out all.

And I responded to that by saying the goal numbers you provided for Barrie were 3 years after his draft. As Girard continues to work on his shot, his shot can improve. If he was handed the same PP time as Barrie with the same level of players, his point totals would go up. It's talking in circles and no matter what is said, you refuse to acknowledge that there is the possibility that Girard's game will continue to grow and he can be just as effective in the offense by being a different player. And then you decide to run away after providing no evidence to support your claim.
 

The Abusement Park

Registered User
Jan 18, 2016
35,108
26,295
And I responded to that by saying the goal numbers you provided for Barrie were 3 years after his draft. As Girard continues to work on his shot, his shot can improve. If he was handed the same PP time as Barrie with the same level of players, his point totals would go up. It's talking in circles and no matter what is said, you refuse to acknowledge that there is the possibility that Girard's game will continue to grow and he can be just as effective in the offense by being a different player. And then you decide to run away after providing no evidence to support your claim.

If you read what I said earlier I said in a vacuum he’d get more points if he was on PP1 for that reason alone. I also said his points depend on how much his shot improves. I also pointed out that he will basically never be on the top PP unit during his time here so that point is irrelevant. I don’t know what else to tell you. We’re gonna have to agree to disagree.
 

xbestboybandever

Registered User
Jun 24, 2015
1,227
433
If you read what I said earlier I said in a vacuum he’d get more points if he was on PP1 for that reason alone. I also said his points depend on how much his shot improves. I also pointed out that he will basically never be on the top PP unit during his time here so that point is irrelevant. I don’t know what else to tell you. We’re gonna have to agree to disagree.

I'll see you next season with a plate of crow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMack29

Gatorbait19

Registered User
Apr 2, 2019
3,940
3,503
What about the following trade scenarios:

Avs get: 8oa + RNH
Avs give: Barrie, 16oa + Kerfoot + Kaut/2020 1st

Oilers get: Barrie + 16oa + Kerfoot + Kaut/2020 1st
Oilers give: 8oa + RNH

OR

Avs get: Trouba + 2019 2nd/decent prospect
Avs give: 16oa + Barrie + kerfoot

Oilers get: Barrie + 16oa + kerfoot
Oilers give: 8oa

Jets get: 8oa
Jets give: Trouba + 2019 2nd/decent prospect

Thoughts? I feel like with the first one we make out like bandits, but the second one is maybe a little bit of an overpayment, although I’d still take it.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad