Post-Game Talk: Two points to Gryffinbore

[chosen]

It basically measures and weighs several categories for every player to give an overall of their performance for that game. If you show up on the scoreboard you're going to be higher than if you blocked more shots.

The colors tries to show the areas the player had a good showing and a negative impact.

Berard scored a goal. Had that goal not gone in, Berard would drop a little because he finished the game with an xgoal .1, and a xgoal against .3

Yellow should be adjusted game score unless they changed it.

Thanks.

What is adjusted game score?

 

[hackeyman]

This chart confuses me. Could I get a non-wiseguy explanation?

1. I assume higher is better?
2. What are the yellow dots?
3. Does this mean Chytil was best on offense?
4. Does this mean Borgen was best on defense?
5. Does this mean Miller was best on Team defense, whatever that means?
6. Does this mean Miller was worst on Team Offense, whatever that means?
7. Miller worst on Team defense?
8. Berard was only player who was positive on offense?

Thanks

It confuses me too but I think I can answer some of your questions. 1. yes and 2. yellow dots represent adjusted game score which are in the pattern of higher is better. 3. chart shows berard best on offense. His dark green individual offense is slightly more than Chytil's and he has light green team offense where Chytil has none. 4-7. too confusing to answer exactly 8. Berard is only player positive on team offense The most confusing aspect to me is the big difference between individual offense with some being positive , none being negative but team offense is mostly negative. The only thing I can make of it all is the chart relies on goals / goals against per icetime compared to team or league averages and does not consider more indepth analytics like possession etc.

 

[will1066]

 

[ArPanet]

Is it possible for Quick to be Rangers goalie coach when he retires? Pay him tons.

 

[Loff]

Heave ho, 10 in a row. Make it happen. Don't let us down.

 

[80shockeywasbuns]

It confuses me too but I think I can answer some of your questions. 1. yes and 2. yellow dots represent adjusted game score which are in the pattern of higher is better. 3. chart shows berard best on offense. His dark green individual offense is slightly more than Chytil's and he has light green team offense where Chytil has none. 4-7. too confusing to answer exactly 8. Berard is only player positive on team offense The most confusing aspect to me is the big difference between individual offense with some being positive , none being negative but team offense is mostly negative. The only thing I can make of it all is the chart relies on goals / goals against per icetime compared to team or league averages and does not consider more indepth analytics like possession etc.

I don’t understand these charts at all this season, it consistently makes no sense. Berard was last in xGF%. He added the QoC/QoT adjustment this year and it just spits out completely random shit

 

[noncents]

Is it possible for Quick to be Rangers goalie coach when he retires? Pay him tons.

great players do not always great coaches make

 

[Good Intentions]

great players do not always great coaches make

No shit.

I think the point is Quick is a leader and the type of guy that you would want behind the bench.

 

[SnowblindNYR]

I'm looking forward to 8 years of praying the backup is playing from now on. All for 11.5M.

 

[Cmox]

How dare you show emotion!!

 

[Leonardo87]

Once again, Quick > Igor

 

[Levitate]

Rangers should hire Quick to their coaching staff or something when he retires

 

[Megustaelhockey]

Rangers should hire Quick to their coaching staff or something when he retires

How soon can he be available?

 

[Machinehead]

This chart confuses me. Could I get a non-wiseguy explanation?

1. I assume higher is better?
2. What are the yellow dots?
3. Does this mean Chytil was best on offense?
4. Does this mean Borgen was best on defense?
5. Does this mean Miller was best on Team defense, whatever that means?
6. Does this mean Miller was worst on Team Offense, whatever that means?
7. Miller worst on Team defense?
8. Berard was only player who was positive on offense?

Thanks

1. Anything to the right of zero is good and anything to the left is bad. Yes, they're ranked by how good they are overall, going up.

2. The yellow dot is where they landed accounting for both positives and negatives, so that's the most important part. You'll see that the yellow dot goes more positive as you go up.

3. Offense is in the green family and it appears to me that Berard has the most green on the positive side of the chart. That makes sense considering he scored the winning goal.

4. It's hard to say. The lighter people indicates that the Rangers did the best with Miller on the ice, but the darker purple indicates he directly caused chances against. It's either Miller or Borgen.

5. "Team" is a measure of how the team did when that player was on the ice in teams of xG. "Individual" defense would be like, if you had a turnover that led directly to a 0.3 xG shot or whatever. This chart indicates that the Rangers were good when Miller was on the ice but he has one or two obvious errors that led to chances.

6. Yes. It is, after all, Miller, who handles the puck like my grandmother, and she's dead. "Team" is the same as the above, except it's generating xG instead of suppressing it. "Individual" is goals and assists which is why only a handful of guys have dark green.

7. Didn't you ask that already?

8. The top 5 all have more offense in the positive than in the negative, and Cuylle is about even. Granted, they all scored points. Yes, Berard is the only one who "drove" offense. The Rangers had 27 shots on goal and 10 high-danger scoring chances in a 2-1 game. And got outplayed. There was also like what, one powerplay in the game? You're not gonna see a ton of offense on the chart.

 

[Captain Lindy]

Trade Miller now while he still has value.Hes a walking disaster all over the ice

He can't get out of here soon enough for me.