Proposal: Two Leaf trades Leafs- Islanders Leafs-Ducks
- Thread starter Hockey 4 Life
- Start date
Not gonna comment on the 1st trade. But the 2nd trade is terrible for the Ducks. Just to dump Mrazek will cost you a 2nd round pick +. That leaves you with a mid 1st for Gibson and Comtois. Not happening. You are missing a couple 2nd round picks just to even out the Mrazek dump.
13th overall for Gibson and comtois is a fair trade. The extra 2nd is for Mrazek. Ducks have a ton of cap and the leafs take on the majority of risk if Gibson doesn't rebound and they are stuck with a 6.4 cap hit for 5 more years.
I gotta agree with Juno that 13th overall isn't enough for two players. I imagine Toronto has to add.
I added kerfoot who the ducks can use this season and trade him for a 2nd at the trade deadline.
WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,700
Anaheim gets a 1st and a 2nd to give up Gibson and take on cap dumps... Wat?
13th overall + kerfoot who they can trade at the deadline for a 2nd and a 2024 2nd for taking Mrazek. Gibson numbers have been poor, if he doesn't rebound with the Leafs they are on the hook for 6.4 million for 5 years. Obviously I think Gibson will rebound but there's a chance he won't.
Not your fault it was an edit.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,546
- 39,384
13th overall would be really disappointing for gibson + comtois tbh…
Make the 2nd a 23 or 24 1st. And then add an alright prospect and I’d be down
WingsMJN2965
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2017
- 18,106
- 17,700
Kerfoot doesn't have the same value to Anaheim's mediocre lineup as he does to Toronto's. Not hard to score on a line with Tavares and either Nylander or Marner.
There's a reason he was discussed as a cap dump last year. A decent season with stud linemates doesn't change much.
CupHolders
Really Fries My Bananas!
- Aug 8, 2006
- 7,566
- 5,905
I am Canadian
AM34|WN88|MM16
Islanders trade is horrible for the Leafs.
Anaheim trade isn't good for Anaheim imo.
Anaheim trade isn't good for Anaheim imo.
leeroggy
Registered User
- Jan 3, 2010
- 9,909
- 6,197
Horrible? Are you taking into consideration the $6 million plus in cap space you gain?
Pure Slaughter Value
Registered User
As an Islanders fan I'd definitely do the first trade but it seems an underwhelming return for Toronto. If Wahlstrom had progressed and become a 20 goal scorer it might be different but we're still not sure what he'll turn into.
Martin Skoula
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 12,205
- 17,168
Wahlstrom and Mayfield are guys who's contributions you can replace with 2-3 mil total spent in the FA market lol.
I don't think the Ducks get enough value to take on Mrazek and give up Gibson/Comtois. Maybe remove Comtois...
Djp
Registered User
on the first trade…. The difference in pick value between 13 and Toronto pick (25-28) is HUGE.
a player at 13 is a solid career player who coukd be a superstar.a pick at 38 is lucky to even see50 nhl games. Wahlstrom was a top 12 pick.
Mayfield>Sandin
13>25-28+ Nylander.
Isles throw in Wahlstom
WTF
the second deal…Kerfoot diesnt return a 2nd given his cap hit. He has a NTC next season.
a late 1st and late 2nd do what forAnaheim?
If Wahlstrom scored 20 goals this season, NYI would not do that deal lol
thusk
Registered User
Sandin >>> of one season of mayfield
Stepan at 6.5M and rantta( with his 29 game high in NY) gave a 8th overall and deangelo... i think a 1 pts/game player can easily get more value than a 13th
Player drafted 13 th
Jarvis, knight, Dellandrea, suzuki, zboril, bean, vrana, morrissey, faksa, baertshi, gormley, kassian, teubert, eller..
Last edited:
Crazy8oooo
Puck Off!
That is not enough going to Anaheim. The 2nd, at minimum, is likely for taking on Mrazek. That leaves the 1st and Kerfoot for Gibson and Comtois. I don’t see any way the Ducks accept that. Need to add another 1st and decent prospect/2nd.
For those saying the Leafs are taking the risk on Gibson, then don’t trade for him. The Ducks aren’t looking to give him away and his contract doesn’t hurt them if they keep him. If they can become a good team in a couple of years, he would still fit in with the timeline. (Assuming he doesn’t demand a trade before then)
For those saying the Leafs are taking the risk on Gibson, then don’t trade for him. The Ducks aren’t looking to give him away and his contract doesn’t hurt them if they keep him. If they can become a good team in a couple of years, he would still fit in with the timeline. (Assuming he doesn’t demand a trade before then)
Jared Dunn
Registered User
He played all over the lineup, I thought he was a lot better overall this year than the two prior in Toronto where he was often just a warm body. If the Ducks retained 50% at the deadline there would be several suitors no doubt, probably Toronto again lol
thusk
Registered User
Switch 1st pick tor from NYI trade and put it in ducks trade look closer of reality in my mind...
CatchyTune
JOHN TAVARES IS A MAPLE LEAF
You’re really trying to spin that as bad for New York? Wouldnt trade Nylander alone for that package
