Rumor: Tulsky/Canes made a last ditch effort to trade for Boeser w. 30 minutes left of the deadline.

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
I don't think KK is a negative asset, just a poor asset for Vancouver
Agreed. He scores at about #60 for centers, which is a low end #2C or a high end #3C. For $4.82M and a big body who plays defense, that's not a bad deal. But for sure if you already have good center depth he could be a surplus piece. Not so for the Canes, and I'm not sure why we would include KK in the trade at all.
 
So Kotkaniemi and a 1st for Boeser and a prospect? Even assuming it's a middling prospect, where is the value for Vancouver? We've done the long contract thing already, it rarely works out for us.

KK might not be someone the Carolina considers a negative asset, or someone that they need to pay to move, but Vancouver definitely would have. Especially considering the 1st round picks Carolina has access too are going to be late, that I don't know if I'd accept KK+1st for the prospect, let alone Boeser. 28 points so far this season, described as "inconsistent", needs to shoot more...he would be in the dog house before his first shift here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bourne Endeavor
JR and Allvin have tried to acquire KK now repeatedly (literally this is the fourth separate occasion his name specifically has come up in trade talks between these two teams. His name almost never comes up in reported trade talks not involving Vancouver.) since we extended him. Clearly, he's a positive-value asset to Vancouver's FO at-least a little bit.

Tulsky clearly overplayed his hand though if he asked for a top prospect though in addition to Boeser for a 1st and KK.
This is all speculative made up crap. The furthest any of this should go is that the Canes tried to get Boeser late and it didn’t happen. Blaming the Canes for why it didn’t happen is comical yet people here are doing it.

I’m guessing most are Vancouver fans sour they’re probably losing Boeser for nothing in the off season since it didn’t happen. Yet somehow blaming the Canes for that.

If he makes sense for us we can bid like everyone else in the summer.
 
They only had 500k until the deal was officially done, which felt completely different that day. The deal was announced as cancelled halfway through the morning of the deadline before it became clear that had just hit a snag and they kept going at it - talking about the stars and the contract. Everything we heard that day and since indicates they had their hands tied because they couldn’t officially go after anything until the official word that the contract was done.
doesn’t stop Tulsky from negotiating the framework of the deal in principal and having the paperwork ready for if/when the Rantanen deal went through.

That didn’t happen though, which seems to indicate there wasn’t enough common ground to make a deal, and if that’s the case then there’s really no reason to blame Ratanen or his agent for CAR’s relative inactivity at the TDL.
 
TDL are mostly for picks and prospects. Often times if there is a player going the other way it’s a minor leaguer that is sent to even out the contracts.

When you wish to send someone with term then it’s something teams need time to figure out. Who knows if the Canucks scouted KK much or at all.
 
hahaha I just hope it was as random and desperate as I imagine. Like, no prior communication, just 30 minutes left and.. Tulsky: “Boeser and a prospect for a 1st and KK!”
Van GM: “..I’m sorry, Tulsky I assume? Look man, it’s late, we aren’t gonna negotiate something that big in 30 mi-“
Tulsky: “Oh man I’m so fired. Hey, don’t tell anyone about this. And I didn’t try and trade for Marner either. Hey, you think you guys will be hiring soon? Hello?”
 
Agreed. He scores at about #60 for centers, which is a low end #2C or a high end #3C. For $4.82M and a big body who plays defense, that's not a bad deal. But for sure if you already have good center depth he could be a surplus piece. Not so for the Canes, and I'm not sure why we would include KK in the trade at all.
in what world does he score at about a 60th best center rate? It isnt the real one. Dude isn't really even a 30 point center. What does that make Filip Chytil and Pius Suter? Top 40 Centers?

Dude is an extremely overpaid 3/4C and is 100% a cap dump
 
  • Like
Reactions: Martin Elz
doesn’t stop Tulsky from negotiating the framework of the deal in principal and having the paperwork ready for if/when the Rantanen deal went through.

That didn’t happen though, which seems to indicate there wasn’t enough common ground to make a deal, and if that’s the case then there’s really no reason to blame Ratanen or his agent for CAR’s relative inactivity at the TDL.
I don’t blame him. I think it sucks the Canes had to wait till the last minute but I don’t hate on Rants for that. I do wonder if there’s some gamesmanship being played by the Stars there as the Canes other moves may have affected something they didn’t like so maybe they did take their time getting the paperwork in. I think you generalize the deadline too much, assuming a team would wait on the Canes. They could have the framework of a deal in place but teams don’t want to wait around. They usually have multiple offers for a player and when the Canes couldn’t make a deal yet the other teams went in other directions. You’ve heard yourself of the Canes having offers from two or three other teams on Rants. The players the Canes wanted likely had similar situations surrounding them.

Without a better 2C, another good D and probably better goaltending I don’t see the Canes winning the cup, adding a winger at the deadline wasn’t pushing them over. As a fan I think we’re lucky it dragged on so they didn’t spend more assets until the summer when they have a ton of cap space.

He hasn't even been there for a full year and you wanna give him credit for building a top 3 team in the east? All he is known for is f***ing up the Rantanen trade.
?!?

Tulsky has been running the show from behind the scenes for years. Waddell was mostly a figurehead. This isn’t secret knowledge. Every move the Canes made since the ownership change has Tulsky all over it. He’s known for a hell of a lot more than this trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
I think you generalize the deadline too much, assuming a team would wait on the Canes.
They could have the framework of a deal in place but teams don’t want to wait around. They usually have multiple offers for a player and when the Canes couldn’t make a deal yet the other teams went in other directions. You’ve heard yourself of the Canes having offers from two or three other teams on Rants. The players the Canes wanted likely had similar situations surrounding them.
was responding to a post specifically about the Boeser offer that apparently never got off the ground — agree with you 100% that the Rantanen sign/trade dragging on until the 11th hour would’ve precluded them from competing for other trade targets who had multiple suitors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
He hasn't even been there for a full year and you wanna give him credit for building a top 3 team in the east? All he is known for is f***ing up the Rantanen trade.

Carolina: “f***ing up the Rantanen trade”

Vancouver: trade miller for scraps, play EP40 through his injury and now he sucks, forgot to trade Boeser before the trade deadline…

I would rather have my GM acquire and try retain a top end talent like Rantanen than whatever it is that Vancouver is doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sigurd and DaveG
Carolina: “f***ing up the Rantanen trade”

Vancouver: trade miller for scraps, play EP40 through his injury and now he sucks, forgot to trade Boeser before the trade deadline…

I would rather have my GM acquire and try retain a top end talent like Rantanen than whatever it is that Vancouver is doing.
Sounds like a gross simplification of Vancouver’s situation. By all accounts Boeser was shopped with no takers. They decided it wasn’t worth moving him for less than a first and I can’t say I blame them.

As for the Miller and Pettersson situations, both guys let the team down in their own way. In each case it’s documented that the team tried to intervene and steer them towards the right path to no avail — for as many differences as the two players have, something they have in common is generational stubbornness and a tendency to go against the grain.

The Miller chapter is over but EP40 still has a chance to write the ending to his story, and I think he’ll bounce back next year in a big way.

That said, for all the people who fell for Petey’s agent’s spin hook, line, and sinker, I have a bridge for sale…
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
Carolina: “f***ing up the Rantanen trade”

Vancouver: trade miller for scraps, play EP40 through his injury and now he sucks, forgot to trade Boeser before the trade deadline…

I would rather have my GM acquire and try retain a top end talent like Rantanen than whatever it is that Vancouver is doing.
End of the day they lost Necas for picks and Stankoven who is .5ppg . Not exactly an amazing move on their behalf. Colorado must be laughing their asses off.

Miller literally had 1 team on his NTC . They ended up getting a half decent return when you take for account that they flipped the 1st for Pettersson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: a mangy Meowth
End of the day they lost Necas for picks and Stankoven who is .5ppg . Not exactly an amazing move on their behalf. Colorado must be laughing their asses off.

Miller literally had 1 team on his NTC . They ended up getting a half decent return when you take for account that they flipped the 1st for Pettersson.
Moving Necas, who takes a lot of risks and showed no desire to stay beyond next year, was addition by subtraction. He was not very compatible with Rod’s system, a system that seems to be quite successful. RBA achieved 300 wins faster than any other coach in NHL history.
 
in what world does he score at about a 60th best center rate? It isnt the real one. Dude isn't really even a 30 point center. What does that make Filip Chytil and Pius Suter? Top 40 Centers?

Dude is an extremely overpaid 3/4C and is 100% a cap dump
I meant even strength points. He is currently 72nd among centers, but the NHL.com list includes Guentzel, Roslovic, Jarvis, and a whole bunch of players who are actually wingers.

He produces ok at 5 on 5. Pius Suter is 84th and Chytil is 99th in 5v5 points. I'm not saying it's elite (Jordan Staal is out producing KK), but it's easily middle 6 C production.

He's not a move-the-needle player, but I think his contract is fair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
Have to point out that any of the Canucks top 3 prospects - d Pete, Willander and Lekk are individually worth mid round 1st rounders at worst. If one of those was indeed the ask along with Boeser, then Allvin was extremely correct to be irritated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regal and Fatass
Have to point out that any of the Canucks top 3 prospects - d Pete, Willander and Lekk are individually worth mid round 1st rounders at worst. If one of those was indeed the ask along with Boeser, then Allvin was extremely correct to be irritated.
Yup. The offer as described by Daliwal was actually saying Boeser had negative value, even though he’s a rental.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jd22
I meant even strength points. He is currently 72nd among centers, but the NHL.com list includes Guentzel, Roslovic, Jarvis, and a whole bunch of players who are actually wingers.

He produces ok at 5 on 5. Pius Suter is 84th and Chytil is 99th in 5v5 points. I'm not saying it's elite (Jordan Staal is out producing KK), but it's easily middle 6 C production.

He's not a move-the-needle player, but I think his contract is fair.
Nobody and I mean nobody except maybe you evaluates a player with only even strength points. That means kotkaniemi is one of the worst pp players as he’s not even in the top 150 for centers. Sure that includes a lot of wingers. So you could say he’s probably not even top 120. That means teams are better off calling up their best AHL center and likely be better off on the powerplay.

If players were evaluated for only even strength offense, hoglander was a top3 winger last season. Hell by points per 60, he was a top 3 player overall! Why not buy low and give us just Sebastian aho for this franchise player? No how about a single late 1st? Still no? Hmmm I wonder why.

Garland is probably a top 5-10 winger this season and every season by this method.
 
Nobody and I mean nobody except maybe you evaluates a player with only even strength points. That means kotkaniemi is one of the worst pp players as he’s not even in the top 150 for centers. Sure that includes a lot of wingers. So you could say he’s probably not even top 120. That means teams are better off calling up their best AHL center and likely be better off on the powerplay.

If players were evaluated for only even strength offense, hoglander was a top3 winger last season. Hell by points per 60, he was a top 3 player overall! Why not buy low and give us just Sebastian aho for this franchise player? No how about a single late 1st? Still no? Hmmm I wonder why.

Garland is probably a top 5-10 winger this season and every season by this method.

ES points aren’t the only measure of a player but a 40-50 point guy who scores entirely at ES is a lot more valuable than one who scores 40-50 points but 15 are on the PP. Those PP points are a lot more replaceable, and there’s only so many PP points to go around. I think calling him a 60ish best offensive center on ES points alone is weak, but he seems to be a reasonably productive 3C who can play some 2C if needed (sort of like Chytil).
 

Ad

Ad