I mean Nashville has clearly stated he is not one of the unavailable players so I don't really understand what you meanEkholm shouldn't be on this trade board. He's not really available. Not in the traditional sense.
David is that you?Ekholm shouldn't be on this trade board. He's not really available. Not in the traditional sense.
Ekholm shouldn't be on this trade board. He's not really available. Not in the traditional sense.
Oh, I think Ekholm is absolutely available. I don't think Forsberg actually is, but I actually expect Ekholm to be moved.#1 on the TSN board. #1 on The Athletic board (Link). Custance was even direct about his availability.
It may be time to move on from the not wanting him to be available barring an unrealistic overpayment stance. There's a lot of smoke here.
Oh, I think Ekholm is absolutely available. I don't think Forsberg actually is, but I actually expect Ekholm to be moved.
This times a million!The TSN guys are absolutely hilarious!! They get paid to speculate. Not very well either. Guys like Lebrun, Dreger etc are talking to fill the air....they rarely get any of this stuff right, let alone first, so calling them insiders is a big joke.
It’s odd that there aren’t any Devils on the list.
Palmieri, Gusev, Murray and Kulikov could all be moved.
Ekholm shouldn't be on this trade board. He's not really available. Not in the traditional sense.
I was thinking the same for the Ducks, although if we are trading for picks I'd rather get 2022 picks.It’s odd that there aren’t any Devils on the list.