BruinDust
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 25,664
- 25,090
This is a false equivalency argument.
A couple short cross-checks off the faceoff (which the ref watched and deemed not worth a penalty) is nothing like truly instigating a fight (hence, why there was no instigator penalty). Gustaffson could have skated away but came back with a cross-check of his own and continued to engage until they both dropped the gloves.
Post Hoc Ergo Proptor Hoc actually describes the argument here being made.
So, you now claim to know what Frederic was thinking?
You think 99.9% of players in the NHL have fought before --or that the rabbit crosschecks were so horrific that it was a "must fight" situation?
Look at the situation, Winnipeg had just made it 6-1. And when I say 99.9% I mean they would of gotten back up and in the face of the player who crossed checked them. Not that every time it results in a fight.
And they weren't rabbit cross-checks (first one knocked Gustafsson to his knees) even if the ref didn't call it (as if that matters what the ref did or didn't do, especially in a 6-1 game).
Frederic was just being a sook. A player lashing out late in a game where him and his team were getting pummeled. Let's not act like that never happens in a competitive game of hockey.
I've always respected and valued your opinion on here this board but your giving Frederic a free pass here.
Last edited: