McTonyBrar
Registered User
- Apr 2, 2018
- 19,536
- 21,284
3 year deals and nonsense.My head is spinning. How has Gleason been waived but not Josh Brown?
This is a strong information based decision making executive leadership group that extends to their coaching staff. Brown was a day 1 signing so very clear he was a pro-active target for end of roster depth as a 7th D. Depth chart changed on August 12 so now he's auditioning for 3RD while the organization is trying to mitigate some loss of three bigger body right d penalty kill options.Or, much more likely, Edmonton's management looked at Desharnais moving on and simply got caught in the age old trap of thinking it's better for your #6 to be huge instead of skilled.
Josh Brown and his agent must think they struck gold. Probably would have been lucky to even get a one way NHL offer from anyone else.
My head is spinning. How has Gleason been waived but not Josh Brown?
My head is spinning. How has Gleason been waived but not Josh Brown?
Behind right handed isn't a skill, and despite being tall, he's not strong and don't win physical battles.Because big and right shot
Yes you are if you demote players afterwards.
All this triggers is setting the ACSL at exactly the cap the moment you assign him to LTIR. If the team gets the cap number below $88M at any point in the season (including Kane's hit) they accrue that amount. This essentially would give them the flexibility to deal with any injury in the season as just a regular IR assignment until they either activate Kane or make a trade essentially banishing him until the playoffs.
If they put Kane onto LTIR at any other point when their cap number is different (say 87.6M). Then they'd only accrue space when below $87.6. That's why it’s almost most advantageous to get as close to the real cap number before moving a player from IR to LTIR.
This is a strong information based decision making executive leadership group that extends to their coaching staff. Brown was a day 1 signing so very clear he was a pro-active target for end of roster depth as a 7th D. Depth chart changed on August 12 so now he's auditioning for 3RD while the organization is trying to mitigate some loss of three bigger body right d penalty kill options.
The donut hole is at 2RD which is harder to fill than many anticipate. If/when the Oilers fill that big role all the depth move down one slot where they were likely envisioned to be. Brown gets job security at very good NHL money with quite likely a very clear outline of his utility to move freely between Edmonton and Bakersfield. He's possibly a PTO guy if sold the financial security vision and plan in Edmonton.
Behind right handed isn't a skill, and despite being tall, he's not strong and don't win physical battles.
Josh Brown is, sincerely, bad at all facets of hockey.
I think they wanted a big, crease clearing Dman to make up for the loss of VD and he was the cheapest option available.This board doesn't want to hear it but the Oilers didn't give him a 3 year contract because they saw him as a Bakersfield option.
He's going to get a real run in Edmonton whether he deserves that or not.
I actually think it's pretty clear. And a really good organizational strategy to bulk up their blueline depth in the off-season through 'free' burialable contracts. No assets expended and money is below the threshold where Brown and Stetcher can be moved up and down. Keep your limited draft collateral for a big move and buying retention/potentially double retention.Look man I hope you're right, but rather than all of these mental gymnastics I think the guy was signed to a term contract and given an extended run in the #6 role above multiple camp hopefuls who have considerably outplayed him is simply because the Oilers, for whatever reason, just really like him.
And that's not the end of the world. Not every move has to be a homerun and it's definitely not an accident that the cap hit is buryable.
I mean he reminds me of some of those guys, but yeah, I get toughness, but he doesn't even display that.He's actually so bad that I don't even think he would be able to play on the DOD Oilers defense. No way in hell should he even be a regular on a team that's contending for a cup.
Yup. I’d rather be a “not tough team” that can keep the puck out of the net.Like I get they might be "worried" about toughness, but Josh Brown is just awful, all around.
You have to hope this new management team can be open to recognize when a decision made is in error and be able to quickly pivot towards improvement.This board doesn't want to hear it but the Oilers didn't give him a 3 year contract because they saw him as a Bakersfield option.
He's going to get a real run in Edmonton whether he deserves that or not.
Like at least a guy like Gazdic was legit tough and Steve McIntyre was terrifying, but Josh isn't that and is bad. This contract makes absolutely no sense in any context.Yup. I’d rather be a “not tough team” that can keep the puck out of the net.
Isn't Kane the 13th forward, given his situation?Not what I would ice but the opening night roster is going to be:
RNH - McDavid - Hyman
Skinner - Draisaitl - Arvidsson
Janmark - Henrique - Brown
Podkolzin - Ryan - Perry
Lavoie
Ekholm - Bouchard
Nurse - Emberson
Kulak - Brown
Stetcher
Skinner
Pickard
Honestly not sure if any of the guys trying to make the team out of camp were even given a real serious look other than Lavoie and even that is mostly just because they don't want to waive him.
Delia, Pedersen, Hamblin and Akey make perfect sense. Tough for Kemp, but I think we might see him this year. Gleason is rough, I don't really understand this after last night's game.
Isn't Kane the 13th forward, given his situation?
I mean he reminds me of some of those guys, but yeah, I get toughness, but he doesn't even display that.
They had to move on from Vinny, but Vinny is MORE than twice the player he is.
His passing, was like the old school 90s style grenades from meat that could barely play.Vinny had his weaknesses and it showed in during the playoffs, but I'd take him over Brown any single day. There was this one specific shift in the 3rd period last night about Brown where I was like are you actually that dumb? He got the puck in the oilers own end after the nucks turned it over, and just slapped the puck away without looking to anybody, and the nucks player happily grabbed it. Kulak's expression looked like WTF too.
Guy looks like a beer leaguer out there, and I've seen better beer league players lmao. Get this plug off the damn team.
His passing, was like the old school 90s style grenades from meat that could barely play.
I think what you are suggesting is like what happens (though the players coming and going and the required Dermott hit might be different)
I have two questions though, if they put Kane on ltir, they have to leave him there for 24 days (I believe) meaning they can’t accrue cap for that first month basically. Is that correct?
Second, I know they can retroactively put a player on ltir but can they put him on ltir, take him off without him being ready to play and then put him on again later on down the road if need be even though it’s the same injury that he had not come back from yet?
i doubt that he will be for long. Either they fill the hole at 2nd paring RD via trade, and/or Brown struggles enough to get demoted. If his play in the preseason is a preview of what to expect from him in the regular season, he won't last long.He's actually so bad that I don't even think he would be able to play on the DOD Oilers defence. No way in hell should he even be a regular on a team that's contending for a cup.
I hope he does, I think he could be a really nice fit on a 3rd line with Henrik and Connor Brown. In tight games, when trying to hold a lead, Janmark could move up and take his place, if need be. Lavoie is big and can shoot, he would add a nice element to that 3rd line.I think Lavoie is making the team