Stringer Bell
Registered User
- Dec 16, 2009
- 2,556
- 1,063
If we don't sign Saad we'll most likely end up trading an asset for an equivalent a month later.
If we don't sign Saad we'll most likely end up trading an asset for an equivalent a month later.
Isnt Saad just a declined and finished version of Knies?The actual difference between a $1mil contract, and a $2 mil contract is $389k for the balance of the season... relatively small amount. I think it's more important for him to find a spot where he can excel, and earn another decent contract next year. It's about opportunity, not salary maximization. I mean, we can offer him the spot beside Nylander and Tavares..... how much better can he do?
I think he has been so bad for the Blues he is a reclamation case rather than a solution. If he wants more than a buryable amount he is a risk and he won't want to be buried twice so he will want some kind of commitment. He doesn't seem like he has a lot to offer if he isn't at the top of his game.Honestly fair. But I think Marner, Nylander, Knies, McMann, Pacioretty, Robertson, Domi and Lorentz have all been more or less good to capable for the most part. Saad would boost the goal scoring depth a lot for sure, but it certainly doesn't make our physicality or intangibles that much better. Saad is also having a rough season shooting wise, and it's possible he continues his struggles on a new team at which point he becomes another retread that can't produce consistently.
All I know is, Saad has 7 goals, that would put him 8th on our team in goals, and 1 goal to tie him with 7th..Isnt Saad just a declined and finished version of Knies?
Less physical now since hes old and slow vs his prime but similar build, shooting/tight hand skills
He could be a good add but I dont recall if his skating sucks
Playing 2 slow skaters with nylander not sure if that will work well
Domi is my major problem right now. He has 0 game at all, cant even make a simple area pass right now and isn't even willing to jump somebody anymore, which is how he fights.
He fought last game I went to, and tried to go Chucky, a bit crazy. Chucky is actually bigger than Reavo, a bit surprising.Domi is my major problem right now. He has 0 game at all, cant even make a simple area pass right now and isn't even willing to jump somebody anymore, which is how he fights.
Yep, that's the plan, finally.Domi, Reaves, Kampf, Holmberg and Dewar are major problems, and they are almost half the forwards. Treliving truly put on a masterclass of building a powerful physical playoff team I sure tell you. All that matters is the playoffs, surely this is when it all comes together.
Matthews isn't the same type of players as the Kuch/McDavids/MacKs of the world. They take over games in a different way then Matthews. They make everyone around them better by play making / controlling the play and ability to finish.This is going to come off as harsh and over reactionary but it's not just last night...
I thought 1/4 of the way through the team had dug in, learned to play proper structure, defense, PK etc. They were playing in a way that inspired confidence. I thought Berube had gotten
The last while, it was similar to the last few years, coast for 2 periods and turn it on in the 3rd period. Last night is fresh in our minds and I am just thinking, you play hard for 3/3 or even 2/3 periods, the game is there for the taking.
On that ice surface last night, Matthews should have been the best in the world...it's so different from a guy like MacKinnon that I notice all over the ice or McDavid.
I am going to steal an analogy from someone else but we've changed the fluids, the brakes, the tires and the starter but here we are so many years later, haven't even thought about changing the engine and management / half the fan base is wondering why we don't have success? The engine is the core in this case, no other way to look at it.
Matthews isn't the same type of players as the Kuch/McDavids/MacKs of the world. They take over games in a different way then Matthews. They make everyone around them better by play making / controlling the play and ability to finish.
While Matthews really only changes the game with his shot, he might be quiet most of the night, but all he needs is the puck in a scoring chance and it's in.
This is going to come off as harsh and over reactionary but it's not just last night...
I thought 1/4 of the way through the team had dug in, learned to play proper structure, defense, PK etc. They were playing in a way that inspired confidence. I thought Berube had gotten
The last while, it was similar to the last few years, coast for 2 periods and turn it on in the 3rd period. Last night is fresh in our minds and I am just thinking, you play hard for 3/3 or even 2/3 periods, the game is there for the taking.
On that ice surface last night, Matthews should have been the best in the world...it's so different from a guy like MacKinnon that I notice all over the ice or McDavid.
I am going to steal an analogy from someone else but we've changed the fluids, the brakes, the tires and the starter but here we are so many years later, haven't even thought about changing the engine and management / half the fan base is wondering why we don't have success? The engine is the core in this case, no other way to look at it.
Matthews deserves some heat in producing when we need him the most but he's still a premier world class player. I'd rather keep him forever than knowing what the team would be without him. Plus I don't have a single ounce of trust in Treliving doing something good there anyway. But it's not always that simple and we can blame a lot of different parts of the team that failed in previous seasons and post-season.
Right now though we have about 8.5M of cap space tied up in forwards that have produced 6 goals in more than half the season. 6 freaking goals man. Matthews has quadruple that by himself and he missed a whole month. If you add the defense, it's really bad. All of them brought in and signed by our current GM except for Rielly, so don't blame the other guy.
Matthews deserves some heat in producing when we need him the most but he's still a premier world class player. I'd rather keep him forever than knowing what the team would be without him. Plus I don't have a single ounce of trust in Treliving doing something good there anyway. But it's not always that simple and we can blame a lot of different parts of the team that failed in previous seasons and post-season.
Right now though we have about 8.5M of cap space tied up in forwards that have produced 6 goals in more than half the season. 6 freaking goals man. Matthews has quadruple that by himself and he missed a whole month. If you add the defense, it's really bad. All of them brought in and signed by our current GM except for Rielly, so don't blame the other guy.
Again. What is the harm of testing what AM can do without Marner. Are they not curious? Is the fact Marner could leave not real? Why are they stapled right now when you can be experimenting a bit.Something to be said for having Matthews and JT healthy for like 5 games because centres do drive the bus but I look at the decisions facing down the team and yes Marner puts up points but I don't know if re-upping him for 12-14M is the wisest thing.
Yea, lack of D scoring and help from the bottom of the roster is an issue but in spite of the new problems we face, I also see a lot of the same problems that have plagued this team for nearly a decade now.
No one knows but we're all starting to ask/wonder, what the hell do you even do if the team gets bounced again round 1 again? For 3-4 years we've said they gotta trade a core guy after the playoffs and they didn't do it. If they just re-up Marner and JT...everyone is a bit older, potential has been reached, they are who they are.
Franky, they should have had a deep run at this point.
Matthews deserves some heat in producing when we need him the most but he's still a premier world class player. I'd rather keep him forever than knowing what the team would be without him. Plus I don't have a single ounce of trust in Treliving doing something good there anyway. But it's not always that simple and we can blame a lot of different parts of the team that failed in previous seasons and post-season.
Right now though we have about 8.5M of cap space tied up in forwards that have produced 6 goals in more than half the season. 6 freaking goals man. Matthews has quadruple that by himself and he missed a whole month. If you add the defense, it's really bad. All of them brought in and signed by our current GM except for Rielly, so don't blame the other guy.
View attachment 969541
McMann is earning his paycheque+.
McMann is an example that you can add to the Core 4, without breaking the bank.
You can double his salary and he'd still be earning it.
At this point, it does seem like a player decision.Again. What is the harm of testing what AM can do without Marner. Are they not curious? Is the fact Marner could leave not real? Why are they stapled right now when you can be experimenting a bit.
Stupid Leafs never learn
Again. What is the harm of testing what AM can do without Marner. Are they not curious? Is the fact Marner could leave not real? Why are they stapled right now when you can be experimenting a bit.
Stupid Leafs never learn
I can be convinced that keeping marner is a better option than keeping Matthews.
I know big man, big scorer.
Over the past 5 seasons he's almost scored (scored goals not earned assists) as well as Nylander in the post-season.
But I think marner can make other players better, even if he is a winger, I think he drives his line.
Remember GIlmour - Andreychuk?
Who is taking the goal scorer here?
Certainly, Matthews has a wider game than Andreychuk, but I'd take Gilmour over Matthews, even when you consider the Rockets.
I've been of this opinion for a while, but when Matthews and Marner are together, their roles become far too designated as shooter and passer to the point where it limits their overall effectiveness and is far too predictable.
Particularly with Matthews because he hardly touches the puck; a lot of times, he's just waiting around in space, which is a waste of his overall ability. The Bertuzzi- Matthews- Domi line post-all-star game last year was probably the best and most engaging version of him that I've seen, which was also backed by scoring at a 140 point pace, albeit in about 15 games or so.
So, more or that, please; it may also light a fire up Domi's backside as well.