Trades & Free Agency Thread: 2024-2025 - Deadline-ageddon

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Dreger says the Leafs are focused on the top guys (Schenn, Nelson and Rantanen)...until they know they are 100% out.

Scott Laughton is a backup option to all 3
 
Reading the Freidman article and specifically this line

There are teams willing to step up in exchange for long-term security.

I wonder if the leafs would put Knies on the table for an extended Rantanen. I wouldn't love it, but yeah.
 
Or you just replace JT and Domi with Rantanen and re-sign Marner with the cap going up. You basically extend your contention window by like 5 years. I know we need a D-man but I would throw Cowan, Minten, Danford and our 1st in 2026 for Rantanen. We could load up 3 lines.

Only issue is would Rantanen re-sign here

No way. We would commit to the same issue all over we also have Knies who needs a deal. Way too much money at wing
 
Reading the Freidman article and specifically this line

There are teams willing to step up in exchange for long-term security.

I wonder if the leafs would put Knies on the table for an extended Rantanen. I wouldn't love it, but yeah.
Not a chance in hell.

I think they're putting Robertson + Minten + 1st on the table (potentially some other lesser assets also) to see if that gets it done.

If you're acquiring MR, Knies won't be in your lineup anymore.
Dont think you realize the Canes dont have much leverage if Rantanen really doesnt want to sign there

Knies isn't going anywhere
 
We do have the cap and we do have the assets. Rantanen is a 4.6M player right now after retention. It would be very much close to the all-in move though, while not bolstering any position of need.

I don't understand the thought process of Carolina at all in this.
My only guess is they have a crazy owner who could decide if the player won't re-sign they should explore the market

Otherwise they absolutely should be self-renting
 
No way. We would commit to the same issue all over we also have Knies who needs a deal. Way too much money at wing
Ok so you sign Knies in the summer go over the cap a bit, and then trade him for futures. You basically load up 3 lines, all signed long term, all around the same age, you re-coup some assets by trading Knies and you basically re-tooled your team and your cap. Or you sign Knies and let Marner walk
 
Then they keep him right?

I could see Clarke and like Moore from la
Hypothetically maybe? They operate differently from other teams.

You know how Lou would be a deadline buyer even with a shit team, like a buyer to a fault? Carolina sometimes cockblocks themselves by obsessing over asset management maybe a little too much?

If you genuinely think you have a shot at the Cup, I mean a real shot not a "derp my way into a loss against the f***ing bluejackets" type of shot, you should take it. But I'm not sure I like their chances getting out of the East and I don't know if they do either. Tough decision.
 
Ok so you sign Knies in the summer go over the cap a bit, and then trade him for futures. You basically load up 3 lines, all signed long term, all around the same age, you re-coup some assets by trading Knies and you basically re-tooled your team and your cap
you maybe better off signing Rant to play 2c, extending Knies and seeing if Marner is interested in a S&T to get the 8th year
 
Knies - Matthews - Marner
Rantanen - Tavares - Nylander

That is nut worthy top 6 if we can make it happen
If this is your top 6 and you have top 3 goaltending in the league like we do, there is 0 reason we shouldn't be going on a deep run

How do teams decide who to put their best defensemen on.....Matthews/Marner or Rantanen/Nylander lmfao
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad