Trade value | Page 4 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
Toggle sidebar

Trade value

DEVILSEBO said:
There you go then. I'll stick with my prediction of third. If it's a second even better but it will never be a first.
Click to expand...

I still dont get it. you think Jagr's trade value will be less because the receiving team will have to pay him soft bonuses. but all his bonuses will already be paid out. so he will be traded with a measly 800k-ish hit.
 
DEVILSEBO said:
Just saying that I don't think a team wants to pay him his salary plus some soft incentives that hes going to hit for games played. Well see. I like my track record on these things.
Click to expand...

His incentives only go up to 45 games, unless he gets injured they'll be paid long before the trade deadline.

Regardless, the bonus cushion is your friend. A team with $3M cap space could still accommodate Jagr's $4M cap hit because of bonuses, even before you factor in pro-rated cap hit.
 
AfroThunder396 said:
His incentives only go up to 45 games, unless he gets injured they'll be paid long before the trade deadline.

Regardless, the bonus cushion is your friend. A team with $3M cap space could still accommodate Jagr's $4M cap hit because of bonuses, even before you factor in pro-rated cap hit.
Click to expand...

now that I think about it....

Jagr's bonus (the cap part) can be deferred, and the Devils could retain up to 50% salary. so... (and I may be wrong on this), the receiving team could have him for 200K. right? no?
 
This is so frustrating and embarrassing. This team needs to trade for scoring and make a big pitch in free agency. We need at least two new forwards.
 
Evander Kane

With all of his problems over his tenure with Winnipeg and his most recent publicly calling out of his coach, I have to think he'd be available. What do you think it would take to trade for him and would you be willing to take him on the Devils?
 
E. Kane for Larsson would be fair value in a vacuum, but The Peg already has plenty of defensemen.

I doubt we could make a reasonable offer. Zajac+ may have some interest if we retained salary, but then we'd be opening one hole to create another. Our center depth would be atrocious. Schneider would appeal to them, but again, shooting ourselves in the foot.

We don't really make good trading partners, we have have similar needs and wants. They're overstocked with defensemen and middle six forwards just like us.
 
AfroThunder396 said:
E. Kane for Larsson would be fair value in a vacuum, but The Peg already has plenty of defensemen.

I doubt we could make a reasonable offer. Zajac+ may have some interest if we retained salary, but then we'd be opening one hole to create another. Our center depth would be atrocious. Schneider would appeal to them, but again, shooting ourselves in the foot.

We don't really make good trading partners, we have have similar needs and wants. They're overstocked with defensemen and middle six forwards just like us.
Click to expand...

I wonder if this might be something to revisit at the deadline/offseason. If the Devils are out of it and they successfully sell off spare parts for picks and young forwards, maybe the Jets would have interest in a combo deal of some of what we've acquired.

I just have to think that he's worn out his welcome there and could use a fresh start...and we could really use a young 30-goal scorer.
 
AfroThunder396 said:
E. Kane for Larsson would be fair value in a vacuum, but The Peg already has plenty of defensemen.

I doubt we could make a reasonable offer. Zajac+ may have some interest if we retained salary, but then we'd be opening one hole to create another. Our center depth would be atrocious. Schneider would appeal to them, but again, shooting ourselves in the foot.

We don't really make good trading partners, we have have similar needs and wants. They're overstocked with defensemen and middle six forwards just like us.
Click to expand...

Hmm...if we're assuming we aren't making the playoffs I wouldn't be against dealing Zajac, Boucher, and a D for him. Loktionov could still C the Czech line and Henrique could C the 2ND line. Then the Devils could worry about addressing C depth in the offseason. The Jets get rid of a headache, Zajac gets to go home, and the Devils add a 22 year old goal scorer with contract security.
 
Pass. I hate his self entitled attitude. Little **** hasn't done a thing in this league.

Then again I still despise him for the money/mayweather selfie he took.
 
MichaelJ said:
Hmm...if we're assuming we aren't making the playoffs I wouldn't be against dealing Zajac, Boucher, and a D for him. Loktionov could still C the Czech line and Henrique could C the 2ND line. Then the Devils could worry about addressing C depth in the offseason. The Jets get rid of a headache, Zajac gets to go home, and the Devils add a 22 year old goal scorer with contract security.
Click to expand...

Winnipeg would probably want us to retain at least 20% of his salary.
 
apice3 said:
Depending on the +, I'd probably do that without hesitation. Kane is inconsistent, but when he is on, he is almost unstoppable.
Click to expand...

I tend to agree. id give up a lot to get him, as he would also add some desperately needed speed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom