He just turned 28 so seems like a great term that won’t age out badly.
Thrilled for Blackwood to get some long-term stability and get paid, but man that could be an ugly contract. Glad not to be the one giving it to him.
He'd probably wanted more anyway from a bottom dweller.Good for Mack, for Colorado and for us. Everyone wins. If that was what he was asking from the Sharks, it would have too much since we have Askarov.
Almost good for us. We unfortunately have 4/5/6/7/8giev manning the pipes. I am just ready to bury him in the minors because I feel like not even Speer can fix this dud of a goalieGood for Mack, for Colorado and for us. Everyone wins. If that was what he was asking from the Sharks, it would have too much since we have Askarov.
Almost good for us. We unfortunately have 4/5/6/7/8giev manning the pipes. I am just ready to bury him in the minors because I feel like not even Speer can fix this dud of a goalie
Happy for Blackwood. He played well for us. I'm even more happy for us because that contract will probably turn out terribly.
While I understand this point on market value for goalies, the amount of goalies I would want to give more than 3 years to I can count on one hand and Blackwood isn't one of them.It might not be great by the end but it shouldn't be terrible. I think Blackwood is 29, so a 5 year deal at a fairly mid-tier starting goalie price should be expected to get 3 or 4 decent starter years out of it and then maybe in his 33 or 34 season you see him break down. It's not like they gave him 8 years or $7.5m per or anything stupid like that.
It's more than the Sharks could've or should've offered given that this is Askarov's team as soon as next season, but it's not a deal that I would be too upset about handing out under different circumstances.
Totally understand Colorado giving it to him, I just personally wouldn't.Depending on how it’s structured, I’d imagine a buyout costs 1.5-2M a year. 2% of the cap for an error. That likely only happens if injuries impact Mak. He’s young and incredibly fit and playing behind a great team. All the Avs need is near league average and to not be a huge dick. The upside for the Avs is significant. They were going to spend this on the best UFA goalie they could find. That’s Blackwood.
Carriere is on an AHL deal, so he can't play for the Sharks without signing an NHL contract, and he's the #5-6 in the system right now.No way sharks sign that kind of contract. Made no sense and I’m sure they balckwoods camp discussed accordingly with Grier. All good decisions for everyone.
Now, should the sharks give carriere a look in the nhl after burying Georgiev? Just to get more experience in the system?
P.S.: I am very excited for next year already. We’re quickly coming to assure a top 4 selection. We’re in every game, so obviously not far from winning these close games. If they get Schaefer than we have a killer 1-2 on D and a strong 1-2-3 forwards with Celebrini, eklund, smith and a strong 1G in Askarov. The next generation will be here and it will be time to go for it…
He'd probably wanted more anyway from a bottom dweller.