DAChampion
Registered User
- May 28, 2011
- 30,526
- 24,056
They're not, you use previous years to establish expectations for future years.Except other years are irrelevant.
With picks 31-40, you have a 10-15% chance of a very good player.
They're not, you use previous years to establish expectations for future years.Except other years are irrelevant.
You happen to overrate the value of 3rd liners. They are not hard to find. And they are usually worth two 2nd round pick maybe less depending on how good or noth that player is.No, it isn't.
You appear to overestimate the value of draft picks. Getting 1 NHLer who can produce & contribute at this rate by 24, out of a late 1st & 2nd, would be considered a positive outcome to anyone grounding their take in actual draft outcomes.
Again, assessments made without grounding in the real context of the NHL make for bad takes imo.
Agreed with everything--particularly the bolded part. We shouldn't have both Dvorak and Evans. We need a tougher centre line for the playoffs. Ideally, that centre would also be good on faceoffs.I don’t know how injured he was or how injury prone he might be going forward. Three years is a long time to have been injured (if that’s what happened) and him coincidentally playing better for a few months during his contract year, raises red flags for me.
Plus, he’s a total vanilla player — I don’t like someone who contributes 12 goals and 21 assists over a regular season schedule. That kind of production is replacement level.
There is also Armia to sign (I know they can afford both). Maybe I’d go with a team friendly short term deal with Armia and take my chances on the market for a better player than Dvorak.
Absolutely! Is there a Corey-Perry type player available?you are so right, add a cory perry type of player to this habs team and they are probably up 3-1..
that will be addressed this off season, i have no worries.
the team showed a lot of heart and talent. now just need those key additions,
You happen to overrate the value of 3rd liners. They are not hard to find. And they are usually worth two 2nd round pick maybe less depending on how good or noth that player is.
Newhook is indeed worth more than the median player drafted 31st overall.
But the value of draft picks comes not from the medians but from the tails. It's a one in three chance of getting a replacement-level player is irrelevant. What matters is the one in ten or fifteen chance of getting a significant positive impact player.
Newhook was traded for a 31st and 37th. Let's look at players drafted between 30 and 40.
2015
Sebastian Aho at 35th
2016
Alex DeBrincat at 39th
2017
Nicholas Hague at 34th
Jason Robertson at 39th
2018
Alex Romanov at 38th
So over four representative years, out of 40 total players, we get at least five significant positive impact players. That's a 12.5% chance. And since the Habs traded two picks, the odds (approximately) double to 25%.
Would you not give up Newhook for a 25% chance at an Aho/DeBrincat/Romanov type player?
Obviously yes, because the tails matter.
Percentages are irrelevant when the draft is imminent. Note I was looking at the 2019 draft when the picks were in the 2023 draft A good GM knows if it s a deep draft or if there is very little at that point in the draft. They could look at it and say the odds of even one player we like as much as Newhook dropping to 31 is very low. And that does apply to the 2023 draft. There were a few players in that range but most were small.They're not, you use previous years to establish expectations for future years.
With picks 31-40, you have a 10-15% chance of a very good player.
Exactly. And right now we have too many dmen who are too easy to play againstI know, but having a big defence always help. Look at the winning teams. Theres not a lot of soft and weak dman. Hutson has to be our only one.
All looks good except Dvorak and maybe another option if Dach gets injured or fails to produceDoes the team need more grit, yes. Does it need more goon? no.
We are missing Dach, who can play hard on the wall, we are missing a 2c and I hope we are not getting Duchene... We need to replace Matheson, Savard will be gone.
Caufeild - Suzuki - Dach/Slaf
Slaf/Dach - 2c [Horvat/Crosby] - Demidov
Anderson - [Dvorak] - Gally
Heineman - Evan - [new 4th line with size and spd]
Guhle - Carrier/ Rienbacher
Hutson - [Poluck]
Xhekaj - Carrier/Reinbacher
Percentages are irrelevant when the draft is imminent. Note I was looking at the 2019 draft when the picks were in the 2023 draft A good GM knows if it s a deep draft or if there is very little at that point in the draft. They could look at it and say the odds of even one player we like as much as Newhook dropping to 31 is very low. And that does apply to the 2023 draft. There were a few players in that range but most were small.
yeah....Corey PerryAbsolutely! Is there a Corey-Perry type player available?
Obviously no, because roster & cap context matter.
Beyond that, I'd obviously take Newhook over a 75% chance of insignificant NHLers (or AHLers), almost in any roster/cap context.
He played like Newhook did. So don’t expect me to get all excited.
The fact remains he has one move, outside-in snapshot. He needs to show more versatility.
Horvat for #16, Beck, Mailloux
Nic Roy for 3rd and 4th (Vegas in cap trouble) and you can’t have enough centres
Laine and J.Roy and 4th to San Jose for 3rd (SJ needs to get to cap floor)
Cernak or some similar to him for Struble and 2/3/4/5 picks. Tampa does need draft picks.
Heard 5 teams are planning to offer sheet Knies this summer. Columbus has all kinds of cap space but need their 2nd back from us in 2026. Trade both seconds in 2026 for the Minnesota 1st rounder that Clb has in 2025. We then still have #17 and likely #20 in 2025.
Sign Dvorak 2x$3
That’s all I want
Slaf Suz Caufield
Dach Horvat Demidov
Gally Dvo Andy
Roy Evans Newhook
Heineman
Matheson Cernak
Hutson Guhle
Xhekaj Carrier
Reinbacher
Roy and Newhook can be good options to replace any injured top 9. Could always upgrade on Dach at TDL if he poops the bed.
If you think wasting a first round to a guy that can't even get 30 points on the top 6 an entire season is better than than a potential player which can easily make his production is good assets is perhaps that your takes are ridiculous.
Weren't you on the Dach train this season also? He was even worse than Newhook before getting injured once again
I assume that Hughes expected Newhook to become better than he has. As he is right now he's kind of like Dvorak, approximately replacement level.
The cost for a replacement level player should be around a 3rd or 4th round pick. Hughes gave up more because they were hoping for more from Newhook, so far it hasn't happened.
If Newhook doesn't improve he'll be off the roster in a few years.
N. Roy is fourth line in Vegas.You don’t acquired Nicolas Roy to put him on the wing of the 4th line, you don’t resign Dvo and put him on the 3rd C. And he’s gonna cost more then that
He’s the 7th more used forward by VegasN. Roy is fourth line in Vegas.
Argh! Why still Matheson?Horvat for #16, Beck, Mailloux
Nic Roy for 3rd and 4th (Vegas in cap trouble) and you can’t have enough centres
Laine and J.Roy and 4th to San Jose for 3rd (SJ needs to get to cap floor)
Cernak or some similar to him for Struble and 2/3/4/5 picks. Tampa does need draft picks.
Heard 5 teams are planning to offer sheet Knies this summer. Columbus has all kinds of cap space but need their 2nd back from us in 2026. Trade both seconds in 2026 for the Minnesota 1st rounder that Clb has in 2025. We then still have #17 and likely #20 in 2025.
Sign Dvorak 2x$3
That’s all I want
Slaf Suz Caufield
Dach Horvat Demidov
Gally Dvo Andy
Roy Evans Newhook
Heineman
Matheson Cernak
Hutson Guhle
Xhekaj Carrier
Reinbacher
Roy and Newhook can be good options to replace any injured top 9. Could always upgrade on Dach at TDL if he poops the bed.
On top of my head can’t think of that , but luckily I am not payed to find such playersAbsolutely! Is there a Corey-Perry type player available?
People overrate a lot draft pick. Of course you could probably find better players at the draft (with hindsight) than what Newhook is/will be for the Habs but apparently the rumor was that if the Habs would have retained the picks they would have selected Gavin Brindley (with their first) and Jacob Fowler (with their 2nd round pick) and we still got him in the 3rd. IMO getting Newhook is so far better than BrindleyI'd gladly take Newhook over:
Mesar
Poehling
McCarron
Scherbak
LeBlanc
Juulsen
Beaulieu
Tinordi
.....
From his own draft year, Newhook (16OA) is currently 9th in scoring, and I bet his next 4 seasons he'll average better production than his career best output in his first 4.
Either way, Let's revisit at the end of his current contract, sha'll we. Happy to eat crow if I'm wrong.