Deebs
F**K Donald Trump
- Feb 5, 2014
- 16,853
- 15,566
Good morning EklundTrade Rumors: Roope Hintz to Habs
Good morning EklundTrade Rumors: Roope Hintz to Habs
We don't forget. We just disagree.
He's been tolerable mostly since being paired with Savard. Nothing more.
I want to see the Xhekaj bros on the Habs.I’d like to see Arber playing alongside someone other than Savard before I entertain a trade for him.
The bash brothers from the Mighty Ducks 2.I want to see the Xhekaj bros on the Habs.
Why in gods name would dallas do that,Trade Rumors: Roope Hintz to Habs
You're not totally wrong that going back to last year, his most common linemate has been Savard by a large amount and Harris/Kovacevic. The problem appears that we lack RH D.I’d like to see Arber playing alongside someone other than Savard before I entertain a trade for him.
Or, maybe even Hutson?Lots of talk here about casting Xhekaj aside.
Little talk about how to help him improve or whom he would pair better with.
Savard is probably not going to be here next year. Perhaps Xhekaj would pair better with Matheson or Engstrom.
People tend to not look that great playing with Matheson as well, especially when he wants to be the main character.Lots of talk here about casting Xhekaj aside.
Little talk about how to help him improve or whom he would pair better with.
Savard is probably not going to be here next year. Perhaps Xhekaj would pair better with Matheson or Engstrom.
No to any offer sheet, much less to Cullye , or McLeod that would need to be OSed to a salary they are not remotely worth.What would guys think about OS to Cuylle or Ryan McLeod this summer??
steep ask I betI am starting to think the play should be Beniers for our 2C solution. Young, signed long term but doesn’t come without risk (has underperformed). Considering the C depth in Seattle’s organization I think they might be open to trading him if it solves some of their D depth issues.
Xhekaj is not exhibiting the qualities of an NHLer unfortunatelyWith Lane and Carrier our defense is small enough, don't want Struble there too. Ideally you want somebody like Xhekaj there that's why I would keep him and work with him. I prefer my defense to be big and heavy so they can lean on opposing forwards, like we see successful teams do in playoffs hockey. Struble is a dime a dozen.
Struble is 6'1 210???With Lane and Carrier our defense is small enough, don't want Struble there too. Ideally you want somebody like Xhekaj there that's why I would keep him and work with him. I prefer my defense to be big and heavy so they can lean on opposing forwards, like we see successful teams do in playoffs hockey. Struble is a dime a dozen.
Still a lightweight for defensemen. Guys like him grow on trees in the nhl.Struble is 6'1 210???
But.....small?? lolStruble is 6'1 210???
He’s a giant next to Carrier.Still a lightweight for defensemen. Guys like him grow on trees in the nhl.
Yes but Carrier is a much better defenseman.He’s a giant next to Carrier.
Yup. Ideally you want a guy like that on the third pair.Carrier looks tired to me. Way too many minutes. He’s a 6 guy on d.