EXPOS123
Registered User
- Jun 29, 2010
- 1,563
- 1,980
What are you talking about? He’s missed on average 25 games per year for the past five yearsHe doesn't do much but he is not brittle.
If that’s not brittle I don’t know what is .
What are you talking about? He’s missed on average 25 games per year for the past five yearsHe doesn't do much but he is not brittle.
I think Calgary is heading for bottom 10 finish.. it is what it is.WORST CASE:
We don't sell.
Miss the Playoffs.
Calgary slips into top 10.
FLA wins the Cup.
I cry....
On the value of second round draft picks to the Habs.
2003: Corey Urquhart, C, 51st overall
2005: Guillaume Latendresse, RW, 45th overall
2006:
Ben Maxwell, C, 49th overall
Mathieu Carle, D, 53rd overall
2007: P.K. Subban, D, 43rd overall
2008: Danny Kristo, RW, 56th overall
2012:
Sebastian Collberg, RW, 33rd overall
Dalton Thrower, D, 51st overall
2013: Artturi Lehkonen, LW, 55th overall
2017:
Josh Brook, D, 56th kverall
Joni Ikonen, C, 58th overall
2018:
Jesse Ylönen, RW, 35th overall
Alexander Romanov , D, 38th overall
2019: Jayden Struble, D, 46th overall
2020:
Luke Tuch, LW, 47th overall
Jan Mysak, LW, 48th overall
2021:
Riley Kidney, C, 63rd overall
Oliver Kapanen, C, 64th overall
2022:
Owen Beck, C, 33rd overall
Lane Hutson, D, 62nd overall
Looks like the probability of getting an impact player is around 25%.
So if the Habs trade all of Armia, Evans, Savard, and Dvorak, they should expect to get one impact player out of it.
I wouldn’t take Dvorak back if he paid the Habs league minimumAssuming Dvo takes league minimum, or close to it that would work, too.
No 38 year old player is worth two firsts and Hage. I don’t care if his name is Mario Lemieux.It’s not gonna be enough (IMO). They gonna want at least a blueship prospect.Even more considering we are not shipping them a top first rounder. It’s tough to find a comparable for a trade involving Crosby, but muost superstar lands blueships, not medium prospects/picks.
Time will tell but any contenders can match mid first + b lvl prospect. Maybe if Sid says it’s Mtl and only Mtl, but hes the definition of a true pro and he wont place Pittsburgh in that position. I’m willing to bet he will retire has a Pen, it’s not like he never won a cup and want that before his carreer is over like Ray Bourque did.No 38 year old player is worth two firsts and Hage. I don’t care if his name is Mario Lemieux.
We can do a lot. We have tons to trade with. We could even move some players at the deadline for another first and give them three. But two firsts and a top prospect is overboard.
Every Time! I’m still sour to the late clinch of Florida and their Stanley cup push in 2022…WORST CASE:
We don't sell.
Miss the Playoffs.
Calgary slips into top 10.
FLA wins the Cup.
I cry....
On the value of second round draft picks to the Habs.
2003: Corey Urquhart, C, 51st overall
2005: Guillaume Latendresse, RW, 45th overall
2006:
Ben Maxwell, C, 49th overall
Mathieu Carle, D, 53rd overall
2007: P.K. Subban, D, 43rd overall
2008: Danny Kristo, RW, 56th overall
2012:
Sebastian Collberg, RW, 33rd overall
Dalton Thrower, D, 51st overall
2013: Artturi Lehkonen, LW, 55th overall
2017:
Josh Brook, D, 56th kverall
Joni Ikonen, C, 58th overall
2018:
Jesse Ylönen, RW, 35th overall
Alexander Romanov , D, 38th overall
2019: Jayden Struble, D, 46th overall
2020:
Luke Tuch, LW, 47th overall
Jan Mysak, LW, 48th overall
2021:
Riley Kidney, C, 63rd overall
Oliver Kapanen, C, 64th overall
2022:
Owen Beck, C, 33rd overall
Lane Hutson, D, 62nd overall
Looks like the probability of getting an impact player is around 25%.
So if the Habs trade all of Armia, Evans, Savard, and Dvorak, they should expect to get one impact player out of it.
And very good when you only consider Hughes selections.But on the other side, the success rate since 2018 looks to be pretty good.
Hutson is a big homerun.
Romanov is great and Beck looks like it too.
Kapanen might be good.
Struble is a decent depth D and Tuch might be a decent 4th liner.
Kidney was looking rough but has been on the upswing and might still do something.
Ylonen and Mysak busted.
Hage Won’t be the one I am trading for anyone .No 38 year old player is worth two firsts and Hage. I don’t care if his name is Mario Lemieux.
We can do a lot. We have tons to trade with. We could even move some players at the deadline for another first and give them three. But two firsts and a top prospect is overboard. Two firsts and Roy or Mailloux should be enough. We could include Struble as well.
I agree Cozens shouldn’t be the target. Unless we give Dach in return and not much more.Now RDS shooting articles that Cozens should be a high target.
Another floater like Dach that cant play center.
Truly remarkable how journalists are so terrible at their jobs.
He got paid 7m for 1 good season , I can't be the only one seeing another Drouism or Dach in action for this player. He's also terrible on faceoffs. couldnt be a worse matchI agree Cozens shouldn’t be the target. Unless we give Dach in return and not much more.
No I prefer no cozens at all.I agree Cozens shouldn’t be the target. Unless we give Dach in return and not much more.
Plan 4 , project demidov as a center ?If I were GM, and fortunately I'm not
I would think Hughes' plan is 3 fold.
1- try to trade for that young C, which seems virtually impossible based on the price tag and the fact that if some are actually available it's probably because they possess 'Dach' like flaws.
2- scour the market for an older 2C - not someone with crazy amount of term but a kind of placeholder with more offence than say Evans. This seems realistic and could probably be procured with picks and maybe a prospect that doesn't set back the rebuild. They could even resign Evans and have a Beck / Evans combo at 3/4.
3- figure out a way with the ample picks and prospects like Mailloux, Roy, etc to get into the top 10 and pick Misa, Hagens, Desnoyers...who along with Hage will be ready once the vet placeholder's contract is close to being up
then...Suzuki and Caufield are still around 26 and 28...Slaf only like 23...Demidov 21...and hage 21...etc...things still align up front
What could go wrong asking a blueship prospect to play a position he never did? (Drouin)No I prefer no cozens at all.
I am still very high on dach as a winger and he will be very affordable after the injuries
Plan 4 , project demidov as a center ?
I think Calgary is heading for bottom 10 finish.. it is what it is.
100% they should try that tooNo I prefer no cozens at all.
I am still very high on dach as a winger and he will be very affordable after the injuries
Plan 4 , project demidov as a center ?
So true. If we are at a Jake Evans short to be screwed...we are screwed.Plus if you’re relying on Jake Evans to maybe make a run at the final wild card spot, you’re not ready for the playoffs.
And very good when you only consider Hughes selections.
I disagree If Hage is the one we need to add to trade to get us a 2nd line center I would do it. Hage is not a sure thing and being a Hab fan growing up doesnt do jack for us. We don't need "stories" we need actual on ice talent so we aren't wasting away our young players on 8 year deals only to get a 2nd line center halfway through or even worse before those contracts end. We need to fill the 2nd line center and RD holes ASAP and not wait on prospects.Hage Won’t be the one I am trading for anyone .
Elite talent , a story that makes him Habs at heart . This guy is a keeper
I wouldn’t take Dvorak back if he paid the Habs league minimum
Well, Dvorak is playing very good hockey for quite some time now. He's pretty good now. Not 4M good, but 2M x 2 years good. 7th C with the most PK time in the NHL, yet he's 28th for goals allowed (that's f***in great). Meanwhile, his expected goal for % is third C material, and on the upper hand. He benefits from playing with Gally and Anderson, but it's a two-way truth, they benefits from playing with him.I wouldn’t take Dvorak back if he paid the Habs league minimum