He's as much a center as Drouin was. He has won 28 faceoffs in 7 years at a rate of 40%.
Yeah, but those were quality F/Os, no?
Just kidding.
Might as well start the saga where Demidov gets moved to C to fill a hole management can?
Picking the best player available at the draft is the choice of many that say, at worst, it is to trade for what you are missing.
Slafkovsky might well still titivate some GM somewhere and help us acquire a true top-6 C that fits with the age group of our young core.
THAT would be a real hockey trade and I wonder if it wouldn't better help the team.
We'd have Caufield, Suzuki, Demidov, young and talented 2nd line C as surer things up front, but we'd still be missing two 2nd line wingers if you don't believe laine can amount to anything constant and serious in Montreal.
Maybe Dach as 2nd line RW?
This upcoming draft would be crucial and Hage, most likely on the wing, panning out into some kind of wonderful would become paramount. Hage would need to become some sort of Pacioretty, maybe.
Or we would need to draft a winger like Bear and hope he can push the pace in our top-6, break down opposing Ds and exploit the talent we do have up front on the top-2 lines.
Is a young, quality C more important to the Habs' rebuild than a winger like Slafkovsky?
I can see a John Leclair error happening all over again.
Slafkovsky + Engstrom
FOR
Center like Recchi at the time.
Center, in Montreal, sees his offensive production drop a little, Slafkovsky becomes a 35-goal power forward and Engstrom a reliable top-4 D...