DAChampion
Registered User
- May 28, 2011
- 30,590
- 22,225
Cool ! You can guess what happened in the past
Dylan Holloway was obvious at the time though.
Cool ! You can guess what happened in the past
Mentioned it more than a few times. Living in Edmonton, I saw a lot of him, and knew he had all the tools, just needed to take that next step. Wish we would have picked him up, this team needs big fast players that can forecheck.Dylan Holloway was obvious at the time though.
Why is Utah shopping for a rental?Sitting here, wide awake, playing pretend GM, I came up with a couple of different names I haven’t heard mentioned with the Habs and thought I’d share some late night thoughts.
One name I keep circling back on is Lawson Crouse. He seems like a prime “buy low” and profit type candidate. He’s only 27 years old and is a big, power forward at 6’4, 215 lbs, on a down year, recently being made a healthy scratch by Utah.
He can hit (has consistently had more than our most physical forward Josh Anderson), he can fight and he can score. I think he’d be a solid pickup for the Habs, and fits well with their budget (he’s making 4 million per for another 2 years after this) and what Gorton and Hughes are looking for in a player. He’s worn an “A” for years as a Coyote, and is known as a solid leader. I’d take a chance on him, and bring him in as a complementary winger.
Assuming the Habs are comfortable in giving Owen Beck the fourth line center role, I’d offer:
To Utah: Jake Evans
To Montreal: Lawson Crouse and 2025 2nd round pick.
Habs give up the cheaper player at the more difficult position while getting a second for the added years on Crouse’s deal. Utah gets the center depth they badly need. Both teams walk away happy.
UFA signing:
Morgan Geekie. Yes he’s a hated Bruin, and yes he’s a right handed shot, but as a guy who has broken out in the last couple of years, he seems like an excellent pickup for relatively cheap money. He has great size, good speed, slick hands and isn’t afraid to go to the dirty areas. Solid defensively and a decent penalty killer. He could easily center our second line next year.
Potential lineup in 2025-2026:
Crouse - Suzuki - Caufield
Demidov - Geekie - Slafkovsky
Heineman - Dach - Laine
Newhook - Beck - Anderson
Hutson - Matheson
Guhle - Carrier
Xhekaj - Reinbacher/Mailloux
Montembeault
Dobes
I'm tired of trying to develop another team's problem child. It rarely works out. We tried that with Dach, Barron, Laine, Newhook.What is your reaction if we trade Newhook and Reinbacher for Cozens?
Or Reinbacher for Cozens straight up? Can’t imagine we don’t send a contract the other way
Just wondering what we would think about that kind of move?
75% of 1st rounders don’t even play a single NHL gameI'm tired of trying to develop another team's problem child. It rarely works out. We tried that with Dach, Barron, Laine, Newhook.
Better off keeping your own draft picks and develop them.
Are you prepared to give up Slafkovsky+ and beg them to take your call and not hang up?Just for shits and giggles, what would it take to get Shane Wright for our 2C spot?
It makes sense to go for the “proven” NHL talent over magic beans but when they cost first round picks in the first place, are older, are busted or castoffs, and unproven as reliable players… what’s the point?75% of 1st rounders don’t even play a single NHL game
Those types of moves are made in hopes of achieving higher success probability
Stastics show you are better off trading your first round pick each year. Generally on draft floor for maximum value. Not always though. But trading them for somebody else's head aches are a no-no.75% of 1st rounders don’t even play a single NHL game
Those types of moves are made in hopes of achieving higher success probability
Zegras another team's headaches. Be another mistake.The FourthPeriod. Not exactly a good source but there is no reason that Zegras isn't available.
I'm tired of trying to develop another team's problem child. It rarely works out. We tried that with Dach, Barron, Laine, Newhook.
Better off keeping your own draft picks and develop them.
It makes sense to go for the “proven” NHL talent over magic beans but when they cost first round picks in the first place, are older, are busted or castoffs, and unproven as reliable players… what’s the point?
Would anyone do the Newhook trade knowing he produces as another Drouin at best? No. Would anyone trade the 13OA for Dach knowing he can’t really play C and has dubious upside given his injury troubles? I hope not.
Are you prepared to give up Slafkovsky+ and beg them to take your call and not hang up?
And then beg Wright to forgive the hideous and cruel things Habs fans and Habs media said and implied about him over the past three years?
I don’t think there’s a fit there.
75% of 1st rounders don’t even play a single NHL game
They almost all play. The amount that don't is usually below 10%
Check any year;
2011 NHL Entry Draft Picks at hockeydb.com
A sortable list of players drafted in the 2011 NHL Entry draft, including their career scoring after being draftedwww.hockeydb.com
Yeah and we should have drafted Q.Hughes or Tkachuk instead of Kotkaniemi and Sebastian Aho instead of Noah Juulsen. But here we are.The Habs should have invested in center Dylan Holoway (54 g, 16 g, 23 a 39 pts) that the Blues got for next to nothing. Center Philip Tomasino (26 g, 11 pts) that Pittsburgh got on waivers or center Morgan Frost (52 g, 26 pts) that Calgary got for next to nothing. All three of these centers are producing at the same rate or better than Dach (#13 + #66 draft pick) and Newhook (#31 + #37 draft pick).
I mentioned yesterday the possibility of having Evans and Armia being moved together. A contending team could drastically improve their 4th line and PK with such a move. I can't remember who mentioned it but sending both those guys to Jersey, Armia 50% retained, for Tatar and Nemec sure seemed like a decent trade. Maybe a minor tweak if necessary but the money works
That's where the "tweak" could come in. We're loaded with picks and they have a player that doesn't have a position and probably won't. They also have a chance to win a cup, doing something like this could improve their chances. Always a possibility to make something happen if one gets creative.NJ won’t trade Nemec for 2 rentals
That weak likely being a first.That's where the "tweak" could come in. We're loaded with picks and they have a player that doesn't have a position and probably won't. They also have a chance to win a cup, doing something like this could improve their chances. Always a possibility to make something happen if one gets creative.
He doesn’t have a position this year, but they won’t trade a player they pick 2oa 3 years ago for 2 rentals that gonna play in their bottom 6. Even player of Guzental caliber didn’t return that type of prospect.That's where the "tweak" could come in. We're loaded with picks and they have a player that doesn't have a position and probably won't. They also have a chance to win a cup, doing something like this could improve their chances. Always a possibility to make something happen if one gets creative.
That's where the "tweak" could come in. We're loaded with picks and they have a player that doesn't have a position and probably won't. They also have a chance to win a cup, doing something like this could improve their chances. Always a possibility to make something happen if one gets creative.
Very possibleHe doesn’t have a position this year, but they won’t trade a player they pick 2oa 3 years ago for 2 rentals that gonna play in their bottom 6. Even player of Guzental caliber didn’t return that type of prospect.
I would expect more if where lucky something like:
2026 1st round pick
One of their 2nd round pick this year
A player/prospect like Nathan Bastien