Jimmy legsI have a strange feeling in my legs. Does that mean anything? Gangrene, paralysis, Parkinson's, a blockbuster trade?
Jimmy legsI have a strange feeling in my legs. Does that mean anything? Gangrene, paralysis, Parkinson's, a blockbuster trade?
It's not David he needs to squeeze. It's the negotiating GM.I'm sure Kent could squeeze a 2nd out of him.
Yeah but Bergevin isn't managing any team at the moment.Savard is minimum a cond 2nd round pick. RHD with experience who won the cup. He looks bad because he is used too much against too strong competition but on a stacked team's 3rd pairing he would be fine. Teams value this kind of player a lot for a cup run. We paid a cond 3rd round pick for Dwight King who was a struggling 4th line winger.
watch Seinfeld...I have a strange feeling in my legs. Does that mean anything? Gangrene, paralysis, Parkinson's, a blockbuster trade?
There's always a fish you just need to lure it.It's not David he needs to squeeze. It's the negotiating GM.
Yeah but Bergevin isn't managing any team at the moment.
I'd investigate high blood pressure.I have a strange feeling in my legs. Does that mean anything? Gangrene, paralysis, Parkinson's, a blockbuster trade?
You can still do it July 1st, the question isn't if we're re-signing Savard & Evans, it's more if they're worth enough to trade.I would've re-signed Savard but he's been so bad this year it's not worth it
Evans should be re-signed no question, 2nd best center in the organization right nowI'd investigate high blood pressure.
You can still do it July 1st, the question isn't if we're re-signing Savard & Evans, it's more if they're worth enough to trade.
We'll see if we can still afford him July 1st.Evans should be re-signed no question, 2nd best center in the organization right now
They should sign him now 3x3, getting a 2nd back for him does nothing, and he isn't worth a 1stWe'll see if we can still afford him July 1st.
If Jake has a good agent, he will decline the offer.They should sign him now 3x3, getting a 2nd back for him does nothing, and he isn't worth a 1st
what's a fair deal for him?If Jake has a good agent, he will decline the offer.
It's about the term length more than the money or AAV. If I look at contracts given last July 1st there were several spent on support guys for 5-7 years. Matt Roy for instance got a 6 years deal and he's basically playing #5-4 minutes. I don't know if it's because of the rumors the owner will want to limit contract length to 5 years in the next CBA, but it's very possible. Engvall in NY is another example, at a 7 years length for basic plumbing.what's a fair deal for him?
A defensive stay at home D-man that could eat up 20 mins a night? I think it does.That doesn't get you any 1st pairing dman, let alone a right handed one.
If a 2nd is the best you can get on the market for him, you keep him and try to sign him until he hits the market. Odds are that Dvorak is gone too and with no 2C, you cant go into the end of the season with only Suzuki at C.They should sign him now 3x3, getting a 2nd back for him does nothing, and he isn't worth a 1st
I'd get that 2nd no issues. Evans is replaceable worst case scenario.If a 2nd is the best you can get on the market for him, you keep him and try to sign him until he hits the market. Odds are that Dvorak is gone too and with no 2C, you cant go into the end of the season with only Suzuki at C.
I dont move him unless I get offer a guy with 2C potential.
If we let Evans walk we have to replace our 2, 3, and 4Cs next yearI'd get that 2nd no issues. Evans is replaceable worst case scenario.
Savard is as good as gone. Slowing down, older and expiring contract. Really no future for him on the Habs now that Carrier is here.I have a strange feeling that we won’t trade Savard and trade Matheson instead
And we have Beck & Kapanen who didn't necessarily look out of place on NHL ice. We can also sign or trade for a 3,4C with ease, Evans will still be available, so we can make an offer. Also we can downgrade Kirby to 3C, look for a 2C instead. We have enough draft capital for it.If we let Evans walk we have to replace our 2, 3, and 4Cs next year
Unless the plan is to be worse than this year
He is, there are lots of Evans across the league, like there were several Carriers available as well.Evans is not replaceable. He's a solid bottom 6 C that gives his all, adds some secondary scoring, is effective on the PK and brings it up a gear during the playoffs. Anyone who says he is replaceable needs to respect the value of quality bottom 6 players.
Not a chance. Teams hold on to players like Evans or trade them to contenders when they are tearing it down for a rebuild for a premium. You trade away Evans, and you create a huge hole in this lineup. You don't appreciate what you have in Evans.And we have Beck & Kapanen who didn't necessarily look out of place on NHL ice. We can also sign or trade for a 3,4C with ease, Evans will still be available, so we can make an offer. Also we can downgrade Kirby to 3C, look for a 2C instead. We have enough draft capital for it.
Does Davidson play center in Laval? Sometimes?
He is, there are lots of Evans across the league, like there were several Carriers available as well.
Edit: I'd try signing Sturm from SJ, very good on face-offs.
Evans is 5th on our team in scoring and over .5 PPG, career year for him and not as easily replaced as you are making it seemAnd we have Beck & Kapanen who didn't necessarily look out of place on NHL ice. We can also sign or trade for a 3,4C with ease, Evans will still be available, so we can make an offer. Also we can downgrade Kirby to 3C, look for a 2C instead. We have enough draft capital for it.
Does Davidson play center in Laval? Sometimes?
He is, there are lots of Evans across the league, like there were several Carriers available as well.
Edit: I'd try signing Sturm from SJ, very good on face-offs.
He is very replaceable, there are lots of .5 PPG guys out there, Eller and Desharnais were examples.Evans is 5th on our team in scoring and over .5 PPG, career year for him and not as easily replaced as you are making it seem
Evans is awesome, and I would gladly give him a 5 year deal. Dude is getting better. He is very much a 3C now.Evans is 5th on our team in scoring and over .5 PPG, career year for him and not as easily replaced as you are making it seem
Lars Eller won a cup playing a key role on his team. Yeah, those guys grow on trees.He is very replaceable, there are lots of .5 PPG guys out there, Eller and Desharnais were examples.
In any case you shall see at the TDL. I don't think Evans' contract is anywhere critical for this management.
Edit: It's even possible they acquire a vet C before the TDL eh...