HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #88: 2024-25 Season

vokiel

#DanzeMolsonMix
Jan 31, 2007
18,391
4,050
Montréal
What is unrealistic is to expect triple redondance on a hockey team. You just don't have that kind of luxury, trading Kova is the willingness to take a steps back to move forward, you need to give Reinbacher NHL rep to move forward.

Guhle is injured, Reinbacher is injured, Savard is playing like shit and Mailloux/Barron are anything but stable... That's quite the toll on the right side at the moment.
Well. there's that. The injury to Reinbacher looks dumb to me, like the guy didn't warm up at all. Maybe with more vets, you get a more serious preseason and less injury issues, but that's a big maybe. And the folks who were going to rely on Reinbacher breaking up are the same who made that horrifying preseason so...

If Barron is out, we need a vet from a waiver wire or from an AHL trade...

Think we can get Kovy back? :naughty:

He's gone...
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,147
105,761
Halifax
Bergevin’s bad off-season led to the team tanking that year so I don’t know why you can’t count it. The horrible start while he was still enployed played a big part in why we finished with the best chance of winning the lottery and set off the chain of events for the rebuild. Gorton was hired 23 games into that season, he hired his own GM and coach shortly after, and sold off the assets we had for what he wanted before getting a lottery pick. He was also able to go into the draft with preparation time with his own staff. I don’t know why that year wouldn’t count as part of the rebuild.

It doesn't count because he didn't make rebuilding moves. He lost a top 3 pick to an offersheet. He extended Armia. He signed Savard. He traded a 1st and a 2nd for Dvorak.

That's not rebuilding behavior therefore it's not part of a rebuild

You can't change the time frame because you want it to look worse than it is.
 

OnTheRun

/dev/null
May 17, 2014
12,629
11,349
Well. there's that. The injury to Reinbacher looks dumb to me, like the guy didn't warm up at all. Maybe with more vets, you get a more serious preseason and less injury issues, but that's a big maybe. And the folks who were going to rely on Reinbacher breaking up are the same who made that horrifying preseason so...

If Barron is out, we need a vet from a waiver wire or from an AHL trade...

Think we can get Kovy back? :naughty:

He's gone...

I don't think their expectation was as high as having Reinbacher breaking out in his D+1. They have displayed Buddhist monk level of patience with rookies since they are in charge, but I don't think expecting Reinbacher to be proficient enough to play with Matheson was unrealistic and the minute you can untie Guhle from Matheson is the minute you start to open options for your defensive pairings.

But anyway the process to get to that point went out of the window very quickly.
 

Habs13

Registered User
Dec 30, 2004
14,519
11,764
Montreal
The problems are the same they've been since the start of the rebuild - unmovable contracts. The you know who's that we can't get rid of.
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
19,941
18,110
It doesn't count because he didn't make rebuilding moves. He lost a top 3 pick to an offersheet. He extended Armia. He signed Savard. He traded a 1st and a 2nd for Dvorak.

That's not rebuilding behavior therefore it's not part of a rebuild

You can't change the time frame because you want it to look worse than it is.
That’s not what I’m doing. Gorton took over 1/4 into that season. And the team was in a tank trajectory when he did where he had almost a full season of time to make moves. Why would that year be removed completely? I feel like people are leaving it out for the opposite reason you mentioned which is to make excuses for how long a rebuild should take.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
90,968
58,071
Citizen of the world
I’d love the habs to make a push for maccelli who is currently in tourigny doghouse in Utah for some obscure reasons. They are looking for help in Defense with Marino and durzi out long term.
Obscure reason? Macc is a good story and I like him as a player but it's quite clear why he's in the dog house. He's a massive risk taker and he's soft. He's not what the team needs.
 

waitin425

Registered User
Jan 10, 2009
8,074
12,139
Canada
I'm intrigued by the thought of adding a top 4 RD. I believe it is our biggest weakness at this point. While Rein or Mailloux could fit that role in the future, it is far from a sure thing.

To get a legit top 4 RD, ideally under the age of 28, I'd offer a pretty big package.

Habs 1st 2025 top 5 protected. Defers to Calgary pick if we land top 5.
2026 2nd round pick
Justin Barron
Josh Roy
 
  • Like
Reactions: LesCactus

LesCactus

Registered User
Oct 19, 2024
54
47
I'm intrigued by the thought of adding a top 4 RD. I believe it is our biggest weakness at this point. While Rein or Mailloux could fit that role in the future, it is far from a sure thing.

To get a legit top 4 RD, ideally under the age of 28, I'd offer a pretty big package.

Habs 1st 2025 top 5 protected. Defers to Calgary pick if we land top 5.
2026 2nd round pick
Justin Barron
Josh Roy
K’Andre Miller came to mind, but then I searched it up and he’s a lefty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: waitin425

Habby4Life

First pick overall goes to the Montreal Canadiens
Nov 12, 2008
4,346
4,083
I'm intrigued by the thought of adding a top 4 RD. I believe it is our biggest weakness at this point. While Rein or Mailloux could fit that role in the future, it is far from a sure thing.

To get a legit top 4 RD, ideally under the age of 28, I'd offer a pretty big package.

Habs 1st 2025 top 5 protected. Defers to Calgary pick if we land top 5.
2026 2nd round pick
Justin Barron
Josh Roy
not MTL pick, no chance
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad