habdynasty
Registered User
- May 26, 2008
- 7,601
- 3,198
Trade Savard, he’s old and won’t get any faster. Free up a spot for a young D
I’m not an expert by any means - I’m an American CPA (accountant) so that qualifies me for nothing lol.Just the pick and and Harris or added with Ghule?
lol. Yeah probably not - a Toronto kid/lifelong leafs fan and we’re not currently a contender.Marner not waiving for the Habs. Think about it.
Trade Savard, he’s old and won’t get any faster. Free up a spot for a young D
No, we need his leadership, experience and his stability defensively.Trade Savard, he’s old and won’t get any faster. Free up a spot for a young D
No, we need his leadership, experience and his stability defensively.
His more valuable to the Habs then the value we will get for him
Many top end players across several pro sports have shown this not to be true.That’s right - $84M to be exact w $64M in bonus payouts. Playing hockey is their livelihood, it’s all about maximizing take home earnings especially for top end players where we’re talking generational wealth
No player has ever left million$ on the table…ever.Many top end players across several pro sports have shown this not to be true.
No player has ever left million$ on the table…ever.
Couple of hundred K sure.
Leaving "millions on the table" & "it's all about maximizing earnings" are two completely different statementsNo player has ever left million$ on the table…ever.
Couple of hundred K sure.
SJS offer wasn’t eligible for bonus structure payout Leafs offered - SJS would’ve needed to offer $10M more over duration of contract to match the take home Leafs contract providedTavares might have. Rumors are the Sharks offered him $13M AAV.
SJS offer wasn’t eligible for bonus structure payout Leafs offered - SJS would’ve needed to offer $10M more over duration of contract to match the take home Leafs contract provided
Trade Savard, he’s old and won’t get any faster. Free up a spot for a young D
Because there’s a special clause created in the Canada / US tax treaty as an exemption for athletes to allow bonus payments from Canadian teams to be taxed at a ridiculously low rate (via tax credits) as long as they maintain US residency status (6-months + 1-day on US soil).Why wasn't the Sharks offer not eligible for bonus structure? How do you knows this? All I remember is they were offering $13M and there is no way you can tell me what the bonus structure was. I doubt that type of information is available.... like the exact contract details.
Because there’s a special clause created in the Canada / US tax treaty as an exemption for athletes to allow bonus payments from Canadian teams to be taxed at a ridiculously low rate (via tax credits) as long as they maintain US residency status (6-months + 1-day on US soil).
Canadian teams along w Bettman lobbied US & Cdn govts hard as a means to even the playing field for attracting players to Canada.
Auston Matthews was the first player to take full advantage of it w the 2nd contract which was almost entirely paid in bonuses with approx $800K as taxable salary
FYITaxes only apply if you spend the money bud. Most of the players salaries are invested. Who's actually spending $5M+ a year to live? E Kane? lol.
FYI.No player has ever left million$ on the table…ever.
Couple of hundred K sure.
Thank you for posting, almost every one of them declined the offers betting on themselves w a short-term deal in order to hit the jackpot with strong performance over the course of the short deal and almost all of them failed miserably.
And Lindstrom...I'd do this in a second but unfortunately don't think Carolina bites. Slaf Dach Svech would be so fun
Like Bergevin did......................Don’t fall in love with vets. Big mistake.
Depends on the vet. Mine works long hours and comes home smelling like shit more often than not, but I wouldn’t trade her for the world.Don’t fall in love with vets. Big mistake.
Thank you for posting, almost every one of them declined the offers betting on themselves w a short-term deal in order to hit the jackpot with strong performance over the course of the short deal and almost all of them failed miserably.
Nope - no top end end player leaves Million$ on the table, the ones that did were banking on making more & majority miscalculated & blew their opportunity.The word "almost" is important.
"All" is a word that has a different meaning.
Almost everyone and all are not the same.
Sooooo.... I guess you are acknowledging that the initial comment you made was inaccurate?
Why you then doubled down on an even more false statement is odd... Especially when a 2-second google search quickly could highlight that.
Speaking in absolutes is often, as in this case, a great way to be completely wrong.
Brady, TomNope - no top end end player leaves Million$ on the table, the ones that did were banking on making more & majority miscalculated & blew their opportunity.
Factually incorrect and easily disproved.Talking generational wealth here - and with each passing year the $ figures for top end players grows exponentially and they’ve become even more sensitive to hoarding as much as they can given the short lifespan of their careers which can end at any moment for no fault of their own.
Your boss was a professional athlete?As a former boss once advised me “I want to make so much money, not because I want or need it but so that my grandchildren’s grandchildren never have to worry about security one day of their life”.