TRADE PANARIN, BUY OUT PANARIN, ANYTHING TO GET RID OF HIM

TRADE PANARIN, BUY OUT PANARIN, ANYTHING TO GET RID OF HIM

  • TRADE PANARIN

    Votes: 30 62.5%
  • BUY OUT PANARIN

    Votes: 5 10.4%
  • TAKE ANY AWFUL CONTRACT JUST TO TRADE PANARIN

    Votes: 13 27.1%

  • Total voters
    48
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course Panarin does not get interviewed after the game. Go figure. This organization loves to pamper their high priced invisible vets
It’s total BS that he gets to skirt accountability because he supposedly can’t speak, I’d tell his interpreter to get lost and make him stand there answering questions like his teammates have to
 
Buyout cap hit of $10,976,190
then 333k for 3 additional years.

Need to ship him out some other way, or get him to retire
We need to giver permission, for him to let Kane + Tara negotiate where they wanna go for min $$ and then we can ship bread there for like a 2nd and signif cap relief.

That's not a fit for every club but it is a viable concept.

You guys are not gonna like your pal bern giving it to you straight,
but the fact is we need to take our medicine due to f'up by mgmt last coupla seasons.

We have Garand who has potential to be our Shesty replacement
We can unofficially dangle post career perks to both Halak + ufa Talbot
which = stopgaps if needed.

Need to sell high on Shesty.
Part of what we might get for that could enable bread to move.

We should move Shesty for best overall deal, which is not nec this one. ...
But as for one that moves bread now:

Shesty + bread reduced 11.x to 9 per
for
McAvoy full pop + Ulmark + Swayman

Why Boston:
comparable G, but Vez winner Shesty is better, and more immediately critical, cheaper given severe cap constraints.
obv don't want to give up McA but that is the cost of getting Shesty, or we deal him elsewhere. I believe McAvoy - Panarin swap saves a half mil, but since McA is longer term deal = improved structural cap situation

Also, w/Bergeron maybe/maybe not retiring, THIS is the type of scenario where if Kane + Tara go close to min, + Bs cut to the bone elsewhere, this is where Bos can possibly add Tara + Kane w/Panarin

Rangers - we still have to cut + juggle to extend, not bridge KAM; this might mean selling Lindgren, which eventually should be considered anyway b'c selling high and developing more/better assets = profit = upside to improve the roster.
But even at 9.5, adding McAvoy would = RDs of Fox, McA, + Schneid. Trouba can still do a chunk of shifts vs slower teams to provide depth/relief, and add to 4RW, where there is less responsibility for speed skating.

Then, of course, we auction off both Swayman + Ulmark to the highest bidders, offering the best futures.

There really is no feasible buyout. >10M ish for 3 years.

Who is going to trade positive assets for him?
few scenarios given cap space
accept a 2nd + cap relief
do not demand positive assets
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad