Sorry, but No, and it's not even really debatable. Granlund is nowhere near even average in his own end.
Speculation: Trade Ideas and Free Agency XI
- Thread starter Avder
- Start date
- Status
Sorry, but No, and it's not even really debatable. Granlund is nowhere near even average in his own end.
tomgilbertfan
#WhyBother
Granlund is below avg defensively, yet has equal amount of blocked shots this year as Koivu... and I know it's a subjective stat, but Granlund is a +6 while Koivu is a -1... much due to who they play against, but it certainly shows that Granlund is not even CLOSE to below avg.
Granlund is an Above avg defender.
Granlund is an Above avg defender.
Prosser has as many blocks as Brodin and Scandella, seems like a great stat to measure defensive ability. Granlund gets manhandled and is worthless down low in the d-zone, I would consider those important aspects of the defensive ability of a center?
Yes, Granlund does get muscled at times, but he is absolutely not worthless down low... he's had quite a few passes picked off of defenders down there.
Above avg doesn't mean great... I already pointed out MOST of the difference between Koivu and Granlund defensively is size related. Granlund has good defensive stick work and sense to be in the right spot, he just doesn't have the size Koivu does to be a dominant defender... that doesn't mean he's below avg.
Even with Coyle's size, Granlund is a MUCH better defender than he is!
BTW - as for your blocked shots comment, there was a reason I also included +/-... Prosser may have just as many blocked shots as those two, but he's also a -10! Brodin is +10 and Scandella is +4. That shows the discrepancy. Where as Koivu and Granlund are equal in blocked shots, and Granlund is actually better in +/-... I never said Granlund was BETTER than Koivu defensively, but he isn't far behind... only size separates their defensive games. Koivu is dominant defensively, Granlund is above avg.
Last edited:
Yeah, anyone calling Granlund a below average defender is just wrong. He has great anticipation and shows alot of hustle in the defensive zone.
Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
Jarick
Doing Nothing
Granlund is below average possession over his career but above average this year. Koivu is an elite possession guy. Granlund does edge out Koivu in points per 60 over his career but Koivu is a bit higher this year. Neither are all that stellar offensively (although Granlund has upside). Factor in faceoffs and to this point, Granlund is noticeably behind Koivu on the depth chart.
FVM
This does not please me.
I think Granlund's next contract is 2 years, 3 - 3.3 million per year. It's a prove-it contract to show he can continue to evolve his game, up his production and most of all, to stay healthy for a full season. But Granlund has leverage too; he's playing a really important position on this team already. Parise is raving about playing with him. I think he can get 3 per year already.
Nino Noderreiter
Registered User
But a lot of that can be explained. Koivu loves to slow it down, hold onto the puck, and cycle it along the boards.
Granlund slices and dashes through the middle of the ice and is always looking to head man the puck. A lot of the time he's moving it pretty quickly...he's more about getting scoring chances off the rush and in transition.
DANOZ28
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2011
- 28,568
- 1,518
He might never be a 20 goal type of player. I hope to see him put up lots of assists, though.
FVM
This does not please me.
It's all about if he can stay healthy for a full season. I still think he has in him 20+50 type seasons. His seasons in Finland:
2009-10: 43 gp 13 + 27 = 40
2010-11: 39 gp 8 + 28 = 36
2011-12: 45 gp 20 + 31 = 51
In his final season he was a real goal scoring threat. I think he can get to 20 goals here too as he keeps evolving and improving. He's only 22, after all.
2009-10: 43 gp 13 + 27 = 40
2010-11: 39 gp 8 + 28 = 36
2011-12: 45 gp 20 + 31 = 51
In his final season he was a real goal scoring threat. I think he can get to 20 goals here too as he keeps evolving and improving. He's only 22, after all.
TwiztedHeat
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2010
- 4,786
- 324
So on topic for a bottom pairing, big bodied lefty defenseman why not take a look at at pure rental in Bryce Salvador? Might as well add another captain to this roster and Salvador would bring amazing depth to the blue line. What can we feasibly say might do the trick?
Salvador for two of Draeger, Gilmour, Keranen, and Labbe possibly. Or include a mid round pick instead.
Salvador for two of Draeger, Gilmour, Keranen, and Labbe possibly. Or include a mid round pick instead.
Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
I wonder if Carolina would be interested in trading Andrej Sekera. A relatively good LHD on a cheap(ish) contract who is a UFA this summer.
He's going to be one of the top 2 or 3 most sought after D-men at the deadline.
I'd rather not get involved in a bidding war.
I'd wonder if Buffalo would want to trade Mikhail Grigorenko...though he seems like a Phillips clone in the fact, upside but is a major project.
El Nino22
Registered User
- Nov 19, 2010
- 1,155
- 0
I think even more important than how many goals Granlund will score, is how many more goals will Granny help his wingers score. Granlund is a playmaker that can open up the ice with his vision and passing. Is he a guy that can elevate the players around him? Looking at the roster we have, without being too generous IMO, five guys who are good for 20 goals (Vanek, Parise, Pommer, Zucker, Nino) and then some guys that should be in the 10-20 range (Koivu, Granny, Coyle, and maybe Haula). The big question for Granlund is can he elevate a guy like Nino/Zucker into a 30+ goal scorer? Can he control the game and make the players around him better? 20 goals is nice but if i'm looking for signs that Granlund is really taking that next step to a great player from a good player I don't think his goal totals will tell the story.
Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
My guess is that they wouldn't until they have McEichel secured, and it wouldn't be for cheap. Maybe a similarly touted prospect at a different position.
- Status
