Guerin seems to love veterans, age 35+. Extended Goligoski, will probably re-sign Fleury, and then maybe pick up Malkin.
I guess this would mean goodbye to Talbot, Fiala and Dumba. If he signs Malkin there's probably no room for Rossi.
Only issue is he doesn’t win faceoffs but can’t argue his production.I’m on board with Malkin, would be the best center we’ve had in years so can’t really complain about the age
Too many connections
Malkin and Rossi would be 2 completely different roster spots. Malkin would be the 1C for Kap/Zucc. There is still room for Rossi on the 3rd line with Boldy and Hartman?
Rossi might be ready at the start of next season, but he may also be better off in the AHL for awhile longer.
Yeah Hartman could go to wing and replace Fiala, that's an option. Then it looks better for Rossi.
Did you read Russo's fresh article about his offseason thoughts? He thinks Jost could be traded, didn't really do much here.
Since bg enjoys pens players, how far out of his prime is Malkin? I know he still had talent and has shown it a bit. Is that gonna be worth signing for a year or so though?
I’ve watched every Pens game in this series and I’m not exaggerating when I say he’s been brutal in all but one game. He’s a TO machine and does not move.
It’s only an idea because of the bg pens connection. Don’t think anyone here really wants him hereMalkin will NEVER come here, unless we pay him a huge amount of $$. Where in the hell are we going to find the cap space?
ridiculous idea.
It’s only an idea because of the bg pens connection. Don’t think anyone here really wants him here
I remember several people last summer wanting to trade for him and extend him.
I recall seeing that as well now that you say it but currently I don’t think anyone is lobbying to go after him.I remember several people last summer wanting to trade for him and extend him.
I’d take him if you trade Dumba and Fiala and can get him for like two years at $5 mil. Would prefer Trocheck.I recall seeing that as well now that you say it but currently I don’t think anyone is lobbying to go after him.
i dont know that NJD would trade #2. that scenario signs nice with those trades i just wont ever expect that to go in our way ever. i suppose i could wrap my head around a malkin signing if its reasonably priced but i still dont want it. since he cant win a faceoff im starting to think of him as a scoring winger who just lines up at center. the few pens games i watched he didnt stand out defensively.I’d take him if you trade Dumba and Fiala and can get him for like two years at $5 mil. Would prefer Trocheck.
Ideally we trade Fiala+27 for NJD #2 and draft Cooley. Then trade Dumba for a late 1st or early 2nd and snag Chesley. Trade Talbot for a 3rd or 4th. Use that money on Trocheck, re-sign Fleury under $4, a 3rd line winger, and depth @ G and F.
I’d take him if you trade Dumba and Fiala and can get him for like two years at $5 mil. Would prefer Trocheck.
Ideally we trade Fiala+27 for NJD #2 and draft Cooley. Then trade Dumba for a late 1st or early 2nd and snag Chesley. Trade Talbot for a 3rd or 4th. Use that money on Trocheck, re-sign Fleury under $4, a 3rd line winger, and depth @ G and F.
Reading the Fleury quotes, I did not get this sentiment. To me it sounded like "This was a good time, more fun than Chicago. Thanks Minnesota!" His quotes didn't say that he wouldn't re-sign in Minnesota, but it also didn't sound like he's overly likely to.It's breakup day, players available to the media, Guerin and Evason tomorrow.
Talbot says he wants to stay, what happened in the playoffs is in the past. Fleury would also like to stay.
I guess Guerin will keep both of them.
It is a weak draft and I wouldn't expect all that much out of #9.What about something around this?
To Min: (Buf) #9oa + John Peterka
To Buf: Fiala+3rd
Peterka was almost ppg in AHL. Could even add Dumba/Goli if Buf has any dmen we want .
(Assuming we can’t get a better pick in draft)
Fleury's agent is Walsh. Stuff made of nightmares.Reading the Fleury quotes, I did not get this sentiment. To me it sounded like "This was a good time, more fun than Chicago. Thanks Minnesota!" His quotes didn't say that he wouldn't re-sign in Minnesota, but it also didn't sound like he's overly likely to.
Also telling was Talbot using "we" and Fleury using "they" when speaking of the Wild's roster. If anything, I would guess that Fleury will go to the best combination of skilled roster and good money. Maybe that's Minnesota, and maybe it's not. Maybe I'm reading too far into things, though. Who knows?
What about something around this?
To Min: (Buf) #9oa + John Peterka
To Buf: Fiala+3rd
Peterka was almost ppg in AHL. Could even add Dumba/Goli if Buf has any dmen we want .
(Assuming we can’t get a better pick in draft)