Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
What do you think he should get?15m is excessive IMO ... but then again, I'm not liepold and I'm not paying him so what do i care. If they can pay him 15 and ice a competitive team, more power to them
What do you think he should get?15m is excessive IMO ... but then again, I'm not liepold and I'm not paying him so what do i care. If they can pay him 15 and ice a competitive team, more power to them
You got me, I'm not prepared to talk actual money. I will say, as much as I like Kap, I don't want to be the team that makes him the highest paid player in NHL history.What do you think he should get?
I’m not un-nervous about it. Just not sure what choice we really have.You got me, I'm not prepared to talk actual money. I will say, as much as I like Kap, I don't want to be the team that makes him the highest paid player in NHL history.
For some reason I thought his contract was up next year. Good point. However, the last time Bogosian played 70 games in a season he was part of the Atlanta Thrashers. The Wild have a myriad of defensemen that are injury prone (Spurgeon, Brodin, Bogosian). If Bogosian gets injured and Spurgeon re-aggravates something, we might find out quickly how terrible our RD depth is.Bogo, who is signed for one more year at a bargain price.
I think he has been laying just fine as a 3rd pairing guy, providing the size and physicality that no on but he and Middleton provide. Jiricek can't even break into the CBJ D lineup, which, Werenski aside, is not impressive.
Why not? If the cap is going to go up 12-15M in on shot (per Friedman), or even as a chance too, then why would you get the extension done a year early?Not sure the can ask for $20M until the cap is officially $100M.
Max contract AAV is 20% of the cap. So I believe it would need to be $100M officially in order to offer it.Why not? If the cap is going to go up 12-15M in on shot (per Friedman), or even as a chance too, then why would you get the extension done a year early?
I just think it has to officially be set before a signed agreement can be made, considering the 20% max rule.Why not? If the cap is going to go up 12-15M in on shot (per Friedman), or even as a chance too, then why would you get the extension done a year early?
Yeah, I know that the new CBA is supposed to get being targeted to be done before the cup finals, but even then I don’t know if we’ll have official numbers to work off of but I’d imagine the teams would have projections. It just makes it extremely difficult to negotiate with your guy early if the cap is going to go up 15M the next year. They’re going to want to use that number or wait.I just think it has to officially be set before a signed agreement can be made, considering the 20% max rule.
You would bet that Kaprizov's camp starts negotiations with a contract that isn't legal per the CBA?I would bet that contract negotiations start with Kaprizov’s team asking for 20M or north of it.
A new CBA isn't going to reveal cap numbers. That's only going to be known for sure probably sometime late in the 2025-26 season. Even now, for next year, Freidman is just currently speculating, even though it's probably educated speculation.Yeah, I know that the new CBA is supposed to get being targeted to be done before the cup finals, but even then I don’t know if we’ll have official numbers to work off of but I’d imagine the teams would have projections. It just makes it extremely difficult to negotiate with your guy early if the cap is going to go up 15M the next year. They’re going to want to use that number or wait.
Will truly be a nightmare scenario if Kaprizov's camp wants to wait till the cap numbers are released for the 25-26 season.And I guess I should preface this by thinking all of this is going on during the summer of 2025. If this is going on in the spring of 2026, then it's different.
We’ve never had a cap jump like this so I don’t know what the NHL will or won’t reveal, but they’re going to have to give teams some sort of detective in this. From Kaprizov’s perspective, makes no sense to negotiate off a 97M cap when it could realistically be 110 when the deal actually kicks in.A new CBA isn't going to reveal cap numbers. That's only going to be known for sure probably sometime late in the 2025-26 season. Even now, for next year, Freidman is just currently speculating, even though it's probably educated speculation.
I'm just saying that Kaprizov likely can't put pen to paper on a number that isn't yet 100% for sure legal. If he signs for $20M on a projected $102M cap, but then for some reason that the cap only gets to $99.8M, that contract would now be void.
And I guess I should preface this by thinking all of this is going on during the summer of 2025. If this is going on in the spring of 2026, then it's different.
The closest you will get to that is if the CBA would change contracts from a flat number to percentage of cap, which isn’t going to happen.We’ve never had a cap jump like this so I don’t know what the NHL will or won’t reveal, but they’re going to have to give teams some sort of detective in this. From Kaprizov’s perspective, makes no sense to negotiate off a 97M cap when it could realistically be 110 when the deal actually kicks in.