Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
You can flip Yurov and Ek for year 1 if you'd like.So you're going all offense no defense with the top-6?
The PP should be good on paper, the PK is going to be terrible again.
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerYou can flip Yurov and Ek for year 1 if you'd like.So you're going all offense no defense with the top-6?
The PP should be good on paper, the PK is going to be terrible again.
Honestly? I'd wonder if we improved or not.Open question: if this was our opening 2025-26 lineup, how would you feel?
Kaprizov - Pettersson - Zuccarello
Boldy - Yurov - Boeser
Ohgren - Eriksson Ek - Hartman
Foligno - Gaudreau - Trenin
Middleton - Faber
Brodin - Jiricek
Buium - Bogosian
No picks or prospects lost or gained.
Open question: if this was our opening 2025-26 lineup, how would you feel?
Kaprizov - Pettersson - Zuccarello
Boldy - Yurov - Boeser
Ohgren - Eriksson Ek - Hartman
Foligno - Gaudreau - Trenin
Middleton - Faber
Brodin - Jiricek
Buium - Bogosian
No picks or prospects lost or gained.
Open question: if this was our opening 2025-26 lineup, how would you feel?
Kaprizov - Pettersson - Zuccarello
Boldy - Yurov - Boeser
Ohgren - Eriksson Ek - Hartman
Foligno - Gaudreau - Trenin
Middleton - Faber
Brodin - Jiricek
Buium - Bogosian
No picks or prospects lost or gained.
Very much the same for me.I would wonder which version of Pettersson we're getting for 11.6M.
I would be the most excited to watch that team since we got Parise / Suter. Buium, Jiricek, Yurov, and Wallstedt themselves are enough to get me excited. Pettersson would potentially be the best center in franchise history if he gets back to full strength.Open question: if this was our opening 2025-26 lineup, how would you feel?
Kaprizov - Pettersson - Zuccarello
Boldy - Yurov - Boeser
Ohgren - Eriksson Ek - Hartman
Foligno - Gaudreau - Trenin
Middleton - Faber
Brodin - Jiricek
Buium - Bogosian
No picks or prospects lost or gained.
Would prefer more of a look at Jiricek first (which they should’ve been doing all season).Open question: if this was our opening 2025-26 lineup, how would you feel?
Kaprizov - Pettersson - Zuccarello
Boldy - Yurov - Boeser
Ohgren - Eriksson Ek - Hartman
Foligno - Gaudreau - Trenin
Middleton - Faber
Brodin - Jiricek
Buium - Bogosian
No picks or prospects lost or gained.
Pretty sure math works in an either/or situation.Should the Wild go after Marner this summer?
Why?
Why Not?
- This is what all the good teams are doing these days. You go after the biggest fish and make the rest of the money work later. Superstars win Stanley Cups
- Kaprizov Insurance
I go back and forth on it. I think the cap will increase even more than is projected and will continue to increase rapidly, so I have more appetite to take risks than when the cap was flat and we had the buyouts. I think it’s unrealistic given how this regime has operated, but it’s at least an interesting thought excercise.
- The Math can work, but not likely with Spurgeon and Rossi.
- Is it really a winning stradegy to invest close to 30M of your cap in two wingers?
It can based on what you set the threshold to fill the rest of the lineup out as. What are you projecting Marner and what are you projecting Rossi?Pretty sure math works in an either/or situation.
Marner = $13MIt can based on what you set the threshold to fill the rest of the lineup out as. What are you projecting Marner and what are you projecting Rossi?
I would have Marner at 14 and yeah, if Rossi is going to be here it’s going to be 7 or under and I think the term is up for debate on that. 5 for me sounds good. Can certainly work.Marner = $13M
Rossi, my opinion is high $7M's is fair long-term, but I'm not against bridging in the $5.5-$6M range.
Rossi out + keep Spurgeon = ~$2M for 1 forward.
Spurgeon out + keep Rossi = ~$9.5M for Rossi + Spurgeon replacement (if that's Jiricek, then just need a 7th defenseman).
I think we have a shot if Buium, Yurov, Faber and Jiricek come close to what we all hope they are.I would have Marner at 14 and yeah, if Rossi is going to be here it’s going to be 7 or under and I think the term is up for debate on that. 5 for me sounds good. Can certainly work.
Kaprizov-Rossi-XX
Boldy-Ek-Marner
Do you think you can win with that top 6?
I agree… That’s better than what the blues had and I’m not sure it’s even close.I think we have a shot if Buium, Yurov, Faber and Jiricek come close to what we all hope they are.
One thing we have to watch for is Gustavsson. If Wallstedt isn't the answer, his leverage goes up and it's kind of hard to separate him from guys like Oettinger and Swayman who got $8M+.I agree… That’s better than what the blues had and I’m not sure it’s even close.
I’m not a fan of paying goaliesOne thing we have to watch for is Gustavsson. If Wallstedt isn't the answer, his leverage goes up and it's kind of hard to separate him from guys like Oettinger and Swayman who got $8M+.
$14M turns my stomach a bit, especially since I kind of have a $15M limit for Kaprizov. He's assist-heavy and plays with Matthews a ton.@Dr Jan Itor so tell me, if you could sign Marner for 14 and figure out the rest later would you?
Yeah I like Ehlers I just worry about how he ages if the skating falls off a little. He would be to Fiala replacement for Boldy though. Same age too.I would go for Ehlers instead. That'll give us a little more money to use elsewhere too while still giving a major boost to scoring.
I think my order of preferences would go like this:I’m not a fan of paying goalies
Guess I'm not sure why you'd think he'd be willing to come here. I think they'd have to significantly overpay him to come play in Minnesota. I don't believe this state or the team are what big name free agents are considering otherwise. Is he a very good player? yeah I'd say so, but I can't imagine having to commit the kind of money it would take to get the guy to sign in this market. Of the 32 teams in the league, I'd be willing to hazard a guess that the Wild are not in the top 20 for player preference. Not because the market itself sucks, but the Wild are a constantly middling team. The state taxes are high. He'd be coming from Toronto. So, the cold probably isn't that big a deal, but if he had the chance, I just have very little doubt he'd take slightly less to play in Florida, Vegas, Dallas, etc. or even one of the other cooler weather states that has more of a winning culture. They'd likely have to make him one of the top 10 highest paid to get him to sign in Minnesota. Do I think he's worth that? Nah. But, that's what I think it could take to get him here.Should the Wild go after Marner this summer?
Why?
Why Not?
- This is what all the good teams are doing these days. You go after the biggest fish and make the rest of the money work later. Superstars win Stanley Cups
- Kaprizov Insurance
I go back and forth on it. I think the cap will increase even more than is projected and will continue to increase rapidly, so I have more appetite to take risks than when the cap was flat and we had the buyouts. I think it’s unrealistic given how this regime has operated, but it’s at least an interesting thought excercise.
- The Math can work, but not likely with Spurgeon and Rossi.
- Is it really a winning stradegy to invest close to 30M of your cap in two wingers?
I don’t think Minnesota is nearly as far down the list of places people want to play as you make it seem, and this is coming from someone who openly moved away. If they give him the market rate, they’re in as good a position to make the jump to contender status as the other teams that will be in the hunt for Marner.Guess I'm not sure why you'd think he'd be willing to come here. I think they'd have to significantly overpay him to come play in Minnesota. I don't believe this state or the team are what big name free agents are considering otherwise. Is he a very good player? yeah I'd say so, but I can't imagine having to commit the kind of money it would take to get the guy to sign in this market. Of the 32 teams in the league, I'd be willing to hazard a guess that the Wild are not in the top 20 for player preference. Not because the market itself sucks, but the Wild are a constantly middling team. The state taxes are high. He'd be coming from Toronto. So, the cold probably isn't that big a deal, but if he had the chance, I just have very little doubt he'd take slightly less to play in Florida, Vegas, Dallas, etc. or even one of the other cooler weather states that has more of a winning culture. They'd likely have to make him one of the top 10 highest paid to get him to sign in Minnesota. Do I think he's worth that? Nah. But, that's what I think it could take to get him here.
Guess I'm not sure why you'd think he'd be willing to come here. I think they'd have to significantly overpay him to come play in Minnesota. I don't believe this state or the team are what big name free agents are considering otherwise. Is he a very good player? yeah I'd say so, but I can't imagine having to commit the kind of money it would take to get the guy to sign in this market. Of the 32 teams in the league, I'd be willing to hazard a guess that the Wild are not in the top 20 for player preference. Not because the market itself sucks, but the Wild are a constantly middling team. The state taxes are high. He'd be coming from Toronto. So, the cold probably isn't that big a deal, but if he had the chance, I just have very little doubt he'd take slightly less to play in Florida, Vegas, Dallas, etc. or even one of the other cooler weather states that has more of a winning culture. They'd likely have to make him one of the top 10 highest paid to get him to sign in Minnesota. Do I think he's worth that? Nah. But, that's what I think it could take to get him here.
Maybe. Dunno. I think the pull to the other places that are going to be bidding for his (or other FA's) services, are going to draw would outweigh coming to Minnesota.I don’t think Minnesota is nearly as far down the list of places people want to play as you make it seem, and this is coming from someone who openly moved away. If they give him the market rate, they’re in as good a position to make the jump to contender status as the other teams that will be in the hunt for Marner.
I hate the 'one of us' thing. I don't care if the person is from Uganda. Just get the best available. Unfortunately, I think that's somewhat how the Wild have to play it. I mean sure, if they can build a winning culture here where they're making deep runs or even win a cup, then it's probably not as much something they need to do in the future. As of right now, IMO, might be what they have to do.This is why I'm thinking the FA signings will be Boeser + Nelson this summer. The #oneofus draw for them to play at home.